| Literature DB >> 34944164 |
Shi-Chen Xie1,2,3,4, Yang Zou2, Zhao Li5, Jian-Fa Yang1, Xing-Quan Zhu1,3,4, Feng-Cai Zou1.
Abstract
Enterocytozoon bieneusi is a fungus-like protist that can parasitize in the intestines of humans and various animals causing a threat to public health. However, there has been no data for E. bieneusi prevalence and genotypes in black goats in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. In this study, 907 fecal samples were collected from black goats in 5 counties from Yunnan Province. The prevalence and genotypes of E. bieneusi were examined by nested PCR amplification targeting the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS). Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was used to further examine the potential occurrence of genetic segregation. The overall prevalence of E. bieneusi in black goats in Yunnan Province was 10.3% (93/907). Statistical analysis revealed that E. bieneusi prevalence was significantly associated with the region, age and gender of black goats (p < 0.001). Four new genotypes (CYG-1, CYG-2, CYG-3, CYG-4) and 11 known genotypes (CHG1, CHG2, CHG3, CHG5, CHG28, J, D, BEB6, Wildboar3, CD6, SDD1) of E. bieneusi were identified. At the microsatellite and minisatellite loci, 15, 2, 17, and 33 sequences were obtained, respectively, forming one new multi-locus genotype (MLG27). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all 15 genotypes were clustered into group 1 and group 2, with zoonotic potential. This is the first report of E. bieneusi prevalence and genotypes in black goats in Yunnan Province, China. Effective control strategies and measures should be taken to reduce the risk of E. bieneusi transmission between black goats, other animals, and humans.Entities:
Keywords: Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Yunnan Province; black goat; multi-locus genotype; prevalence; zoonotic potential
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944164 PMCID: PMC8698114 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Prevalence and risk factors of Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection in Yunnan black goats.
| Factor | Categories | No. Tested | No. Positive | Prevalence% (95% CI) | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Wuding | 444 | 65 | 14.6 (11.4–17.9) | 8.6 (1.2–63.2) | |
| Mouding | 145 | 13 | 9.0 (4.3–13.6) | 4.9 (0.6–38.6) | ||
| Yongreng | 139 | 14 | 10.1 (5.1–15.1) | 5.6 (0.7–43.7) | ||
| Ninglang | 51 | 1 | 2.0 (−1.8–5.8) | Ref. | ||
| Mengla | 128 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
| Gender | Female | 274 | 61 | 22.3 (17.3–27.1) | 5.4 (3.4–8.5) | |
| Male | 633 | 32 | 5.1 (3.3–6.8) | Ref. | ||
| Age | M < 12 | 212 | 41 | 19.3 (14.0–24.7) | 3.6 (2.6–6.0) | |
| 12 ≤ M < 24 | 232 | 23 | 9.9 (6.1–13.8) | 1.6 (0.9–2.9) | ||
| M ≥ 24 | 463 | 29 | 6.3 (4.1–8.5) | Ref. | ||
| Total | 907 | 93 |
Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi identified in Yunnan black goats in different farms.
| Region | Farm ID | No. Positive/Total | Prevalence (%) | Genotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuding | Farm 1 | 0/8 | 0 | - |
| Farm 2 | 2/99 | 2.0 | CYG-3 (1), CHG3 (1) | |
| Farm 3 | 18/127 | 14.2 | Wildboar3 (8), CHG5 (7), CHG1 (2), D (1) | |
| Farm 4 | 27/50 | 54.0 | CHG1 (23), D (1), Wildboar3 (1), CD6 (1), SDD1 (1) | |
| Farm 5 | 2/30 | 6.7 | BEB6 (1), CHG3 (1) | |
| Farm 6 | 4/23 | 17.4 | CHG3 (2), BEB6 (1), CHG2 (1) | |
| Farm 7 | 7/42 | 16.7 | BEB6 (2), CHG1 (2), CHG28 (2), Wildboar3 (1) | |
| Farm 8 | 5/35 | 14.3 | CHG3 (5) | |
| Farm 9 | 0/30 | 0 | - | |
| Mouding | Farm 10 | 8/81 | 11.1 | BEB6 (4), CYG -3 (1), CYG -4 (1), D (1), Wildboar3 (1) |
| Farm 11 | 6/64 | 7.8 | BEB6 (2), Wildboar3 (2), CYG-1 (1), CHG3 (1) | |
| Yongreng | Farm 12 | 6/89 | 6.7 | BEB6 (3), Wildboar3 (2), CHG3 (1) |
| Farm 13 | 7/50 | 14.0 | CYG -2 (2), BEB6 (2), J (2), Wildboar3 (1) | |
| Ninglang | Farm 14 | 1/51 | 2.0 | CD6 (1) |
| Mengla | Farm 15 | 0/128 | 0 | - |
| Total | 93/907 | 10.3 | CHG1 (27), Wildboar3 (16), BEB6 (15), CHG3 (11), CHG5 (7), D (3), J (2), CD6 (2), CHG28 (2), CYG-2 (2), CYG-3 (2), CHG2 (1), SDD1 (1), CYG-1 (1), CYG-4 (1) |
Genetic polymorphisms in the ITS region of novel genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from black goats in this study.
| Genotype | Nucleotide Position | GenBank ID | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | ||||||||
| BEB6 | T | MH794170 | ||||||
| CYG-2 | C | MZ479293 | ||||||
| 32 | 34 | 82 | 94 | 114 | 118 | 132 | ||
| D | G | C | C | C | C | T | G | AF101200 |
| CYG-1 | A | C | T | T | C | G | G | MZ479291 |
| CYG-3 | G | T | C | T | T | T | A | MZ479298 |
| CYG-4 | A | C | C | T | C | G | A | MZ479290 |
Multi-locus characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in black goats in Yunnan Province.
| ITS Genotype | Multi-Locus Genotypes | MLGs (No.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | MS3 | MS4 | MS7 | ||
| CHG1 | Type19 | Type1 | Type14 | Type12 | MLG27 (2) |
| CHG1 | Type19 | - | Type14 | Type12 | - |
| CHG1 | Type18 | - | Type14 | Type12 | - |
| CHG1 | Type20 | - | Type15 | Type13 | - |
| CHG1 | Type20 | - | Type14 | Type14 | - |
| CHG3 | Type18 | - | Type14 | Type13 | - |
| CHG3 | Type21 | - | Type16 | Type13 | - |
| CHG1 | Type22 | - | - | Type12 | - |
| CHG1 | Type19 | - | - | Type12 | - |
| CHG1 | Type24 | - | - | Type12 | - |
| CD6 | Type18 | - | - | Type12 | |
| CHG1 | Type23 | - | - | - | |
| CYG-3 | Type23 | - | - | - | - |
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes based on ITS sequences. All the known genotypes and new genotypes identified in this study were marked by black triangles and unfilled circles, respectively. Bootstrap value is shown when value over than 50%.
Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in goats in the world.
| Country | County | No. of Positive/Tested | Prevalence% | Gene Locus | ITS Genotypes | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 14/73 | 19.2 | ITS | Unknown | [ | |
| China | Ningxia | 89/300 | 29.7 | ITS | Unknown | [ |
| Anhui | 30/574 | 5.2 | ITS | CHG3 (14), CHG1 (12), AHG2 (2). AHG1 (1), COS-Ⅱ (1) | [ | |
| Jiangsu | 2/74 | 2.7 | ITS | CHG3 (1), BEB6 (1) | ||
| Shandong | 0/24 | 0 | ITS | - | ||
| Henan | 0/109 | 0 | ITS | - | ||
| Henan | 113/343 | 32.9 | ITS | BEB6 (22), CHG1 (13), CHG3 (10), CHG2 (6), CD6 (4), E (3), CHG5 (3), F (2), KIN-1 (2), D (2), J (1), COS-I (1), CHG6 (1), CHG7 (1), CHG8 (1), CHG9 (1), CHG10 (1), CHG11 (1), CHG13 (1), CHG18 (1), CHG20 (1), CHG21 (1), CHG22 (1), CHG23 (1), CHG25 (1) | [ | |
| Yunnan | 30/134 | 22.4 | ITS | BEB6 (14), E (4), F (1), CHG3 (2), D (1), COS-I (1), CD6 (1), CHG1 (1), CHG5 (1), CHG16 (1), CHG17 (1), CHG19 (1) | ||
| Anhui | 6/80 | 7.5 | ITS | BEB6 (1), CHG5 (1), CHG3 (1) | ||
| Chongqing | 5/8 | 62.5 | ITS | CHG1 (2), CHG3 (1), CD6 (1), CHG12 (1) | ||
| Shaanxi | 22/46 | 47.8 | ITS | BEB6 (4), CHG1 (3), CHG3 (3), CD6 (3), CHG5 (2), E (1), F (1), CHG14 (1), CHG16 (1), CHG24 (1) | ||
| Hainai | 82/341 | 24.0 | ITS | CHG5 (47), CHG3 (23), CHG2 (4), CM21 (3), D (2), AHG1 (1), HNG-I (1), HNG-II (1) | [ | |
| Tibet | 25/260 | 9.6 | ITS | EbpA (15), EbpC (16) | [ | |
| Yunnan | 30/336 | 8.93 | ITS | BEB6 (10), COS-Ⅰ (4), SX1 (3), CM21 (2), CHG3 (2), PigEb4 (1), CHS5 (1), EbpC (1), YNS1 (1) | [ | |
| Heilongjiang | 12/55 | 21.8 | ITS | Peru6 (3); BeB6 (3); D (2); EbpC (2); EbpA (1); COG-I (1) | [ | |
| Shaanxi | 179/629 | 28.5 | ITS | SX1 (56), CHG1 (42), BEB6 (6), CHG2 (2) | [ | |
| Henan | 106/144 | 73.6 | ITS | BEB6 (45), COS-I (14), CHS7 (14) | ||
| Qinghai | 11/59 | 18.6 | ITS | CHG (9), CHG3 (2) | [ | |
| Egypt | Giza | 11/83 | 13.3 | SSU rRNA | Unknown | [ |
| Spain | 1/7 | 14.2 | SSU rRNA | Unknown | [ | |
| Slovakia | 0/20 | 0 | ITS | Unknown | [ |