Literature DB >> 34941452

Stiffness is associated with hepatic stellate cell heterogeneity during liver fibrosis.

Enis Kostallari1, Bo Wei1,2, Delphine Sicard3, Jiahui Li4, Shawna A Cooper5, Jinhang Gao1,2, Mrunal Dehankar6, Ying Li6, Sheng Cao1, Meng Yin4, Daniel J Tschumperlin3, Vijay H Shah1.   

Abstract

The fibrogenic wound-healing response in liver increases stiffness. Stiffness mechanotransduction, in turn, amplifies fibrogenesis. Here, we aimed to understand the distribution of stiffness in fibrotic liver, how it impacts hepatic stellate cell (HSC) heterogeneity, and identify mechanisms by which stiffness amplifies fibrogenic responses. Magnetic resonance elastography and atomic force microscopy demonstrated a heterogeneous distribution of liver stiffness at macroscopic and microscopic levels, respectively, in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) mouse model of liver fibrosis as compared with controls. High stiffness was mainly attributed to extracellular matrix dense areas. To identify a stiffness-sensitive HSC subpopulation, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on primary HSCs derived from healthy versus CCl4-treated mice. A subcluster of HSCs was matrix-associated with the most upregulated pathway in this subpopulation being focal adhesion signaling, including a specific protein termed four and a half LIM domains protein 2 (FHL2). In vitro, FHL2 expression was increased in primary human HSCs cultured on stiff matrix as compared with HSCs on soft matrix. Moreover, FHL2 knockdown inhibited fibronectin and collagen 1 expression, whereas its overexpression promoted matrix production. In summary, we demonstrate stiffness heterogeneity at the whole organ, lobular, and cellular level, which drives an amplification loop of fibrogenesis through specific focal adhesion molecular pathways.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The fibrogenic wound-healing response in liver increases stiffness. Here, macro and microheterogeneity of liver stiffness correlate with HSC heterogeneity in a hepatic fibrosis mouse model. Fibrogenic HSCs localized in stiff collagen-high areas upregulate the expression of focal adhesion molecule FHL2, which, in turn, promotes extracellular matrix protein expression. These results demonstrate that stiffness heterogeneity at the whole organ, lobular, and cellular level drives an amplification loop of fibrogenesis through specific focal adhesion molecular pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atomic force microscopy; fibrosis; magnetic resonance elastography; single-cell RNA sequencing; stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34941452      PMCID: PMC8793867          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00254.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  45 in total

1.  Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells.

Authors:  R E Mahaffy; C K Shih; F C MacKintosh; J Käs
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Hepatic stellate cell autophagy inhibits extracellular vesicle release to attenuate liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Jinhang Gao; Bo Wei; Thiago M de Assuncao; Zhikui Liu; Xiao Hu; Samar Ibrahim; Shawna A Cooper; Sheng Cao; Vijay H Shah; Enis Kostallari
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Focal adhesion kinase links mechanical force to skin fibrosis via inflammatory signaling.

Authors:  Victor W Wong; Kristine C Rustad; Satoshi Akaishi; Michael Sorkin; Jason P Glotzbach; Michael Januszyk; Emily R Nelson; Kemal Levi; Josemaria Paterno; Ivan N Vial; Anna A Kuang; Michael T Longaker; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Spinal Cord Injury Results in Chronic Mechanical Stiffening.

Authors:  John G Cooper; Delphine Sicard; Sripadh Sharma; Stephanie Van Gulden; Tammy L McGuire; Miguel Pareja Cajiao; Daniel J Tschumperlin; John A Kessler
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ramón Bataller; David A Brenner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis in an animal model with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; John Woollard; Xiaofang Wang; Vicente E Torres; Peter C Harris; Christopher J Ward; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  P300 Acetyltransferase Mediates Stiffness-Induced Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells Into Tumor-Promoting Myofibroblasts.

Authors:  Changwei Dou; Zhikui Liu; Kangsheng Tu; Hongbin Zhang; Chen Chen; Usman Yaqoob; Yuanguo Wang; Jialing Wen; Jan van Deursen; Delphine Sicard; Daniel Tschumperlin; Hongzhi Zou; Wei-Chien Huang; Raul Urrutia; Vijay H Shah; Ningling Kang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Micro-mechanical characterization of lung tissue using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Daniel J Tschumperlin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Single-Cell Transcriptomics Uncovers Zonation of Function in the Mesenchyme during Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Ross Dobie; John R Wilson-Kanamori; Beth E P Henderson; James R Smith; Kylie P Matchett; Jordan R Portman; Karolina Wallenborg; Simone Picelli; Anna Zagorska; Swetha V Pendem; Thomas E Hudson; Minnie M Wu; Grant R Budas; David G Breckenridge; Ewen M Harrison; Damian J Mole; Stephen J Wigmore; Prakash Ramachandran; Chris P Ponting; Sarah A Teichmann; John C Marioni; Neil C Henderson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Nuclear deformation mediates liver cell mechanosensing in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sergi Guixé-Muntet; Martí Ortega-Ribera; Cong Wang; Sonia Selicean; Ion Andreu; Jenny Z Kechagia; Constantino Fondevila; Pere Roca-Cusachs; Jean-François Dufour; Jaime Bosch; Annalisa Berzigotti; Jordi Gracia-Sancho
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.