Victoria Helmly 1 , Marisol Garica 1 , Brie Williams 2 , Benjamin A Howell 3 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: With a rapidly growing population of older adults with chronic illness in US prisons, the number of people who die while incarcerated is increasing. Support for patients' medical decision-making is a cornerstone of quality care for people at the end of life (EOL). This study aims to identify, describe, and analyze existing policies regarding EOL decision-making in U.S. Departments of Corrections. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study performed an iterative content analysis on all available EOL decision-making policies in US state departments of corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. FINDINGS: This study collected and reviewed available policies from 37 of 51 prison systems (73%). Some areas of commonality included the importance of establishing health-care proxies and how to transfer EOL decision documents, although policies differed in terms of which patients can complete advance care planning documents, and who can serve as their surrogate decision-makers. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many prison systems have an opportunity to enhance their patient medical decision-making policies to bring them in line with community standard quality of care. In addition, this study was unable to locate policies regarding patient decision-making at the EOL in one quarter of US prison systems, suggesting there may be quality-of-care challenges around formalized approaches to documenting patient medical wishes in some of those prison systems. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first content analysis of EOL decision-making policies in US prison systems. © Emerald Publishing Limited.
PURPOSE: With a rapidly growing population of older adults with chronic illness in US prisons, the number of people who die while incarcerated is increasing. Support for patients' medical decision-making is a cornerstone of quality care for people at the end of life (EOL). This study aims to identify, describe, and analyze existing policies regarding EOL decision-making in U.S. Departments of Corrections. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study performed an iterative content analysis on all available EOL decision-making policies in US state departments of corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. FINDINGS: This study collected and reviewed available policies from 37 of 51 prison systems (73%). Some areas of commonality included the importance of establishing health-care proxies and how to transfer EOL decision documents, although policies differed in terms of which patients can complete advance care planning documents, and who can serve as their surrogate decision-makers. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many prison systems have an opportunity to enhance their patient medical decision-making policies to bring them in line with community standard quality of care. In addition, this study was unable to locate policies regarding patient decision-making at the EOL in one quarter of US prison systems, suggesting there may be quality-of-care challenges around formalized approaches to documenting patient medical wishes in some of those prison systems. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first content analysis of EOL decision-making policies in US prison systems. © Emerald Publishing Limited.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Advance care planning; Advance directives; Correctional health care; Do not resuscitate; End of life; Health-care directives; Hospice care; Living wills; Palliative care
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2021
PMID: 34939768 PMCID: PMC9013007 DOI: 10.1108/IJPH-06-2021-0060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Prison Health ISSN: 1744-9200