Literature DB >> 34939768

A review and content analysis of U.S. Department of Corrections end-of-life decision making policies.

Victoria Helmly1, Marisol Garica1, Brie Williams2, Benjamin A Howell3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With a rapidly growing population of older adults with chronic illness in US prisons, the number of people who die while incarcerated is increasing. Support for patients' medical decision-making is a cornerstone of quality care for people at the end of life (EOL). This study aims to identify, describe, and analyze existing policies regarding EOL decision-making in U.S. Departments of Corrections. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study performed an iterative content analysis on all available EOL decision-making policies in US state departments of corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
FINDINGS: This study collected and reviewed available policies from 37 of 51 prison systems (73%). Some areas of commonality included the importance of establishing health-care proxies and how to transfer EOL decision documents, although policies differed in terms of which patients can complete advance care planning documents, and who can serve as their surrogate decision-makers. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many prison systems have an opportunity to enhance their patient medical decision-making policies to bring them in line with community standard quality of care. In addition, this study was unable to locate policies regarding patient decision-making at the EOL in one quarter of US prison systems, suggesting there may be quality-of-care challenges around formalized approaches to documenting patient medical wishes in some of those prison systems. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first content analysis of EOL decision-making policies in US prison systems. © Emerald Publishing Limited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance care planning; Advance directives; Correctional health care; Do not resuscitate; End of life; Health-care directives; Hospice care; Living wills; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34939768      PMCID: PMC9013007          DOI: 10.1108/IJPH-06-2021-0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prison Health        ISSN: 1744-9200


  7 in total

1.  Barriers associated with the implementation of an advance care planning program in a prison setting.

Authors:  Sara Sanders; Meredith Stensland; Jane Dohrmann; Erin Robinson; Kim Juraco
Journal:  J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care       Date:  2014

2.  Agency behind bars: Advance care planning with aging and dying offenders.

Authors:  Sara Sanders; Meredith Stensland; Kim Juraco
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  2017-03-29

3.  Detained and Dying: Ethical Issues Surrounding End-of-Life Care in Prison.

Authors:  Meredith Stensland; Sara Sanders
Journal:  J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

4.  Completion of advance directives among U.S. consumers.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Lynda A Anderson; Feng-Chang Lin; Jeffrey P Laux
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The Effect of Social Support and Meaning of Life on the Quality-of-Life Care for Terminally Ill Patients.

Authors:  Patricia Dobríková; Dušana Pčolková; Layla Khalil AlTurabi; Daniel J West
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care.

Authors:  Kuldeep N Yadav; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Saida Kent; Jennifer Kim; Nicole Herbst; Adjoa Mante; Scott D Halpern; Katherine R Courtright
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life-limiting illness-A systematic review.

Authors:  N Bradley; M Lloyd-Williams; C Dowrick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.520

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.