Literature DB >> 34937703

Reward Value Revealed by Auction in Rhesus Monkeys.

Alaa Al-Mohammad1, Wolfram Schultz2.   

Abstract

Economic choice is thought to involve the elicitation of the subjective values of the choice options. Thus far, value estimation in animals has relied on stochastic choices between multiple options presented in repeated trials and expressed from averages of dozens of trials. However, subjective reward valuations are made moment-to-moment and do not always require alternative options; their consequences are usually felt immediately. Here, we describe a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) auction-like mechanism that provides more direct and simple valuations with immediate consequences. The BDM encourages agents to truthfully reveal their true subjective value in individual choices ("incentive compatibility"). Male monkeys reliably placed well-ranked BDM bids for up to five juice volumes while paying from a water budget. The bids closely approximated the average subjective values estimated with conventional binary choices (BCs), thus demonstrating procedural invariance and aligning with the wealth of knowledge acquired with these less direct estimation methods. The feasibility of BDM bidding in monkeys paves the way for an analysis of subjective neuronal value signals in single trials rather than from averages; the feasibility also bridges the gap to the increasingly used BDM method in human neuroeconomics.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The subjective economic value of rewards cannot be measured directly but must be inferred from observable behavior. Until now, the estimation method in animals was rather complex and required comparison between several choice options during repeated choices; thus, such methods did not respect the imminence of the outcome from individual choices. However, human economic research has developed a simple auction-like procedure that can reveal in a direct and immediate manner the true subjective value in individual choices [Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism]. The current study implemented this mechanism in rhesus monkeys and demonstrates its usefulness for eliciting meaningful value estimates of liquid rewards. The mechanism allows future neurophysiological assessment of subjective reward value signals in single trials of controlled animal tasks.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDM; bidding; choice; ranking; reward; second-price auction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34937703      PMCID: PMC8883853          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1275-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  27 in total

1.  Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice.

Authors:  N S Linder; G Uhl; K Fliessbach; P Trautner; C E Elger; B Weber
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Adaptive coding of reward value by dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Philippe N Tobler; Christopher D Fiorillo; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Samejima; Yasumasa Ueda; Kenji Doya; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.

Authors:  Wilfried Genest; William R Stauffer; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural correlates of economic value and valuation context: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  John Tyson-Carr; Katerina Kokmotou; Vicente Soto; Stephanie Cook; Nicholas Fallon; Timo Giesbrecht; Andrej Stancak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reward value-based gain control: divisive normalization in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Kenway Louie; Lauren E Grattan; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A range-normalization model of context-dependent choice: a new model and evidence.

Authors:  Alireza Soltani; Benedetto De Martino; Colin Camerer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Dynamic construction of stimulus values in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Ralph Adolphs; Colin Camerer; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptation of reward sensitivity in orbitofrontal neurons.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kobayashi; Ofelia Pinto de Carvalho; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dopamine reward prediction error responses reflect marginal utility.

Authors:  William R Stauffer; Armin Lak; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.