| Literature DB >> 34936842 |
Teun Kuil1, Shuen Hon2,3, Johannes Yayo1, Charles Foster3,4, Giulia Ravagnan1, Costas D Maranas3,4, Lee R Lynd2,3, Daniel G Olson2,3, Antonius J A van Maris1.
Abstract
The atypical glycolysis of Clostridium thermocellum is characterized by the use of pyrophosphate (PPi) as a phosphoryl donor for phosphofructokinase (Pfk) and pyruvate phosphate dikinase (Ppdk) reactions. Previously, biosynthetic PPi was calculated to be stoichiometrically insufficient to drive glycolysis. This study investigates the role of a H+-pumping membrane-bound pyrophosphatase, glycogen cycling, a predicted Ppdk-malate shunt cycle, and acetate cycling in generating PPi. Knockout studies and enzyme assays confirmed that clo1313_0823 encodes a membrane-bound pyrophosphatase. Additionally, clo1313_0717-0718 was confirmed to encode ADP-glucose synthase by knockouts, glycogen measurements in C. thermocellum, and heterologous expression in Escherichia coli. Unexpectedly, individually targeted gene deletions of the four putative PPi sources did not have a significant phenotypic effect. Although combinatorial deletion of all four putative PPi sources reduced the growth rate by 22% (0.30 ± 0.01 h-1) and the biomass yield by 38% (0.18 ± 0.00 gbiomass gsubstrate-1), this change was much smaller than what would be expected for stoichiometrically essential PPi-supplying mechanisms. Growth-arrested cells of the quadruple knockout readily fermented cellobiose, indicating that the unknown PPi-supplying mechanisms are independent of biosynthesis. An alternative hypothesis that ATP-dependent Pfk activity circumvents a need for PPi altogether was falsified by enzyme assays, heterologous expression of candidate genes, and whole-genome sequencing. As a secondary outcome, enzymatic assays confirmed functional annotation of clo1313_1832 as ATP- and GTP-dependent fructokinase. These results indicate that the four investigated PPi sources individually and combined play no significant PPi-supplying role, and the true source(s) of PPi, or alternative phosphorylating mechanisms, that drive(s) glycolysis in C. thermocellum remain(s) elusive. IMPORTANCE Increased understanding of the central metabolism of C. thermocellum is important from a fundamental as well as from a sustainability and industrial perspective. In addition to showing that H+-pumping membrane-bound PPase, glycogen cycling, a Ppdk-malate shunt cycle, and acetate cycling are not significant sources of PPi supply, this study adds functional annotation of four genes and availability of an updated PPi stoichiometry from biosynthesis to the scientific domain. Together, this aids future metabolic engineering attempts aimed to improve C. thermocellum as a cell factory for sustainable and efficient production of ethanol from lignocellulosic material through consolidated bioprocessing with minimal pretreatment. Getting closer to elucidating the elusive source of PPi, or alternative phosphorylating mechanisms, for the atypical glycolysis is itself of fundamental importance. Additionally, the findings of this study directly contribute to investigations into trade-offs between thermodynamic driving force versus energy yield of PPi- and ATP-dependent glycolysis.Entities:
Keywords: Acetivibrio thermocellus; Clostridium thermocellum; H+-pumping membrane-bound pyrophosphatase; PPi; Ppdk; acetate cycling; atypical glycolysis; functional annotation; glycogen cycling; pyrophosphate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34936842 PMCID: PMC8863071 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01857-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1PPi-dependent glycolysis of Clostridium thermocellum. PPi is consumed by PPi-dependent phosphofructokinase (PPi-Pfk) and pyruvate phosphate dikinase (Ppdk) (indicated in red) and may be formed by the proton-pumping membrane-bound pyrophosphatase (PPase) and glycogen cycling (indicated in blue), with ADP-glucose synthase (Ags) as the key enzyme. The H+/PPi stoichiometry of the PPase is based on previous estimations (2). Solid arrows represent a single reaction; dashed arrows represent lumped reactions. Abbreviations: ADPG, ADP-glucose; CB, cellobiose; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; FBP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; G1P, glucose-1-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; Glu, glucose; Glyc, glycogen; Mal, malate; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate.
Pyrophosphate stoichiometry of biomass components formed from cellobiose
| Macromolecule | Biomass composition | PPi stoichiometry (mmol per g cells) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biosynthesis of component | Polymerization of component | Total | ||
| Protein | 52.85 | −3.471 − 4.556 | +4.688 | 1.218 − 4.556 |
| DNA | 2.60 | +0.067 | +0.080 | +0.147 |
| RNA | 6.55 | +0.103 | +0.195 | +0.298 |
| Lipids | 7.60 | −0.779 − 1.636 | −0.779 − 1.636 | |
| Lipoteichoic acids | 3.04 | 0.073 − 0.136 | 0.073 − 0.136 | |
| Cell wall components | 22.42 | 0.166 − 0.938 | 0.166 − 0.938 | |
| Ash fraction | 4.94 | |||
|
|
|
| ||
Composition taken from Oh et al. (29) for Bacillus subtilis grown in aerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultivations at a dilution rate of 0.10 h−1.
For macromolecules derived from pyruvate, acetyl-CoA, or α-ketoglutarate, a degree of freedom (x) is included. This parameter describes the flux distribution between the Ppdk reaction and the malate shunt. If x = 1, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through Ppdk. If x = 0, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through the malate shunt.
The ash fraction equals the ion and metabolite fraction reported by Oh et al. (29).
A breakdown of the PPi stoichiometries of each macromolecule is shown in Tables S2 to S8.
FIG 2Theoretical pyrophosphate and carbon amounts (in mmol per g cells) needed for biomass formation from precursor metabolites for wild-type C. thermocellum grown on cellobiose. The PPi and carbon fluxes are determined from the stoichiometric analysis of biosynthesis using the macromolecular composition of aerobically grown glucose-limited chemostat cultures of B. subtilis (Table 1). The parameter x (in the red boxes) describes the flux distribution between the Ppdk reaction and the malate shunt (x = 1, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through Ppdk; x = 0, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through the malate shunt). Numbers in gray boxes represent the amounts of cellobiose or precursor metabolites needed for biomass formation in mmol g−1; numbers in red boxes represent the PPi amounts produced or consumed per precursor metabolite needed for biomass formation in mmol g−1. Gray circles represent precursor metabolites; red circles represent PPi; white circles represent nonprecursor metabolites. Solid arrows represent a single reaction; dashed arrows represent lumped reactions. Cyan arrows represent the malate shunt; the orange arrow represents the Ppdk reaction. For the PPi stoichiometry of E4P and R5P, the nonoxidative pentose-phosphate pathway as proposed by Koendjbiharie et al. (60) is used. Abbreviations: 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; AcCoA, acetyl-coenzyme A; AKG, α-ketoglutarate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; SucCoA, succinyl-coenzyme A.
FIG 3Schematic representation of the estimated pyrophosphate amounts (in mmol per g cells) needed in anabolism and catabolism for wild-type C. thermocellum grown in cellobiose-limited chemostat cultures (at a dilution rate of 0.1 h−1). The PPi amounts depend on the parameter x, which describes the flux distribution between the Ppdk reaction and the malate shunt (x = 1, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through Ppdk; x = 0, the PEP-to-pyruvate conversion solely goes through the malate shunt). The amount of PPi and cellobiose (in mmol) needed for anabolism is based on the stoichiometric analysis of biosynthesis (Fig. 2) using the macromolecular composition of aerobically grown glucose-limited chemostat cultures of B. subtilis (Table 1). The total amount of cellobiose (19.48 mmol) needed per gram of cells is based on an observed biomass yield of 0.15 g cells per g cellobiose obtained for cellobiose-limited chemostat cultures of wild-type C. thermocellum (30). The amount of cellobiose needed for catabolism (11.80 mmol) is calculated by subtracting the anabolic requirement (3.59 mmol) and unaccounted carbon (21% of the total, i.e., 4.09 mmol) from the total amount of cellobiose. Red arrows represent PPi amounts in mmol g−1; black arrows represent cellobiose amounts in mmol g−1. Figure adapted from Holwerda et al. (18).
FIG 4Two putative pyrophosphate-supplying pathways as identified with the help of the optStoic algorithm (31). (1) Ppdk–malate shunt cycle, where the malate shunt operates in the forward direction (PEP-to-pyruvate) and Ppdk in the reverse direction (pyruvate-to-PEP). (2) Acetate cycling, which occurs via the two-step conversion of acetyl-CoA to acetate, catalyzed by phosphotransacetylase (Pta) and acetate kinase (AcK), and the subsequent conversion of acetate to acetyl-CoA, catalyzed by acetyl-CoA synthetase (Acs). Both pathways result in formation of one PPi from one ATP equivalent. For the Ppdk–malate shunt cycle, a simultaneous transhydrogenation of NADH and NADP+ to NAD+ and NADPH also occurs. ATP, ADP, and AMP were balanced in the overall stoichiometry with the adenylate kinase reaction (2 ADP ATP + AMP) and the nucleoside-diphosphate kinase reaction (ATP + NDP ADP + NTP). Abbreviations: AcCoA, acetyl-coenzyme A; Acetyl-P, acetyl-phosphate; CoA, coenzyme-A; MAL, malate; Mdh, malate dehydrogenase; Me, malic enzyme; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pepck, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; Ppdk, pyruvate phosphate dikinase; PYR, pyruvate.
PPase and Ppdk activities of cell extracts from C. thermocellum wild-type and mutant strains
| Strain | Relevant genotype | Enzyme activity (μmol mg protein−1 min−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPase | Ppdk | ||
| LL1004 | Wild-type | 0.037 ± 0.007 | 0.40 ± 0.04 |
| AVM008 | Δ | <0.005 | ND |
| AVM003 | Δ | ND | <0.05 |
| AVM061 | Δ | <0.005 | <0.05 |
Averages and standard deviations were obtained from two independent biological duplicates. The detection limit was 0.05 μmol mg protein−1 min−1 for the Ppdk assay and 0.005 μmol mg protein−1 min−1 for the PPase assay.
ND, not determined.
FIG 5Growth (OD600) and glycogen formation of LL1004 (wild type) (A), AVM051 (ΔP,) (B), and AVM061 (Δppase ΔP, Δppdk Δclo1313_1686) (C). Cultures were grown on LC medium containing 5 g L−1 cellobiose. Symbols: black circles, OD600; orange squares, glycogen content. Data are shown for one representative experiment (n = 3). Averages and standard deviations for each data point were obtained from technical triplicate measurements.
FIG 6Maximum specific growth rates, biomass yields, and fermentation product yields of C. thermocellum wild-type and mutant strains in batch serum bottle cultures. Cultures were grown on LC medium containing 5 g L−1 cellobiose. Averages and standard deviations were obtained from three independent biological replicates. Absence of error bars indicates standard deviations were equal to zero.
FIG 7Growth and product profiles of LL1004 (wild type; left column) and AVM061 (Δppase ΔP, Δppdk Δclo1313_1686; right column) during growth arrest studies. Cultures were grown on LC medium (top; control experiment), LC medium without Na2SO4 and with 0.01 g L−1 cysteine (middle; S-limited), and LC medium without cellobiose and Na2SO4 but with 0.01 g L−1 cysteine (bottom; S-limited, no cellobiose). Data are shown for one representative experiment (n = 2).
PPi-, ATP-, and GTP-dependent phosphofructokinase activities of cell extracts from C. thermocellum LL1004 and AVM061
| Strain | Relevant genotype | Enzyme activity (μmol mg protein−1 min−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPi | ATP | GTP | ||
| LL1004 | Wild-type | 3.55 ± 0.77 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
| AVM061 | Δ | 2.55 ± 0.22 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Averages and standard deviations were obtained from two independent biological duplicates. The detection limit was 0.05 μmol mg protein−1 min−1.
Strains used in this study
| Strain name | Parental strain | Organism | Relevant genotype | Accession no. | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| New England Biolabs (C2566I; Ipswich, MA, USA) | ||||
| BL21 pTrc99a |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK30 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK50 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK51 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK52 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK53 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK54 |
| This study | |||
| BL21 pTK55 |
| This study | |||
| Wild-type or LL1004 |
| Wild-type DSM1313 |
| DSMZ | |
| LL1041 or M1448 | LL345 or M1354 |
| DSM1313 Δ |
|
|
| AVM003 | LL1004 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM008 | LL1004 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM051 | LL1004 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM059 | LL1004 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM052 | AVM003 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM053 | AVM008 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM060 | AVM051 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM056 | AVM053 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
| AVM061 | AVM056 |
| LL1004 Δ |
| This study |
Plasmids used in this study
| Plasmid name | Relevant characteristic(s) | Accession no. | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| pDGO145 | Deletion vector backbone |
|
|
| pLL1228 |
|
| |
| pSH226 |
| This study | |
| pTK3 |
| This study | |
| pTK20 |
| This study | |
| pTK22 |
| This study | |
| pTrc99a |
| Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden) | |
| pTK30 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK50 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK51 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK52 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK53 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK54 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
| pTK55 | pTrc99a with |
| This study |
Primers used in this study
| No. | Purpose | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| 224 | Amplification of pDGO145 backbone |
|
| 225 | Amplification of pDGO145 backbone |
|
| 63 | Amplification of P |
|
| 64 | Amplification of P |
|
| 222 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of |
|
| 100 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of |
|
| 101 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of |
|
| 102 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of |
|
| 105 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 223 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 419 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of P |
|
| 420 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of P |
|
| 418 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of P |
|
| 395 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of P |
|
| 390 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 417 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 396 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 397 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| XSH0987 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of |
|
| XSH0988 | Amplification of 5′-flanking region of |
|
| XSH0989 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of |
|
| XSH0990 | Amplification of 3′-flanking region of |
|
| XSH0991 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| XSH0992 | Amplification of internal region of |
|
| 482 | Amplification of pTrc99a backbone for pTK30, pTK50–pTK55 |
|
| 483 | Amplification of pTrc99a backbone for pTK30 |
|
| 617 | Amplification of pTrc99a backbone for pTK50–pTK55 |
|
| 484 | Amplification of |
|
| 485 | Amplification of |
|
| 618 | Amplification of |
|
| 619 | Amplification of |
|
| 620 | Amplification of |
|
| 621 | Amplification of |
|
| 622 | Amplification of |
|
| 623 | Amplification of |
|
| 624 | Amplification of |
|
| 625 | Amplification of |
|
| 632 | Amplification of |
|
| 633 | Amplification of |
|
| 634 | Amplification of |
|
| 635 | Amplification of |
|
| 282 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 281 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 280 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 284 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 157 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 156 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 163 | Confirmation of correct deletion plasmid assembly |
|
| 248 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pLL1228 |
|
| 249 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pLL1228 |
|
| 524 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pSH226 |
|
| 525 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pSH226 |
|
| 246 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK3 |
|
| 247 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK3 |
|
| 406 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK20 and pTK22 |
|
| 329 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK20 and pTK22 |
|
| 486 | Confirmation of correct expression plasmid assembly |
|
| 628 | Confirmation of correct expression plasmid assembly |
|
| 325 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK30 |
|
| 401 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK30 |
|
| 404 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK30 |
|
| 626 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK50 |
|
| 627 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK50 |
|
| 327 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK51 |
|
| 330 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK51 |
|
| 139 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK52 |
|
| 629 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK52 |
|
| 630 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK53 |
|
| 631 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK53 |
|
| 636 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK54 |
|
| 637 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK54 |
|
| 638 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK55 |
|
| 639 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK55 |
|
| 640 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK55 |
|
| 641 | Confirmation of correct plasmid assembly pTK55 |
|
| 33 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 34 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 285 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 289 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 146 | Confirmation of |
|
| 147 | Confirmation of |
|
| 148 | Confirmation of |
|
| 149 | Confirmation of |
|
| 423 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 326 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 398 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 313 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 399 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 400 | Confirmation of P |
|
| 242 | Confirmation of |
|
| 243 | Confirmation of |
|
| 244 | Confirmation of |
|
| 245 | Confirmation of |
|
| 495 | Confirmation of |
|
| 496 | Confirmation of |
|
| 497 | Confirmation of |
|
| 498 | Confirmation of |
|
| 1 | Amplification of 16S rRNA fragment for culture purity confirmation |
|
| 2 | Amplification of 16S rRNA fragment for culture purity confirmation |
|
Uppercase letters indicate the primer annealing sequences. Lowercase letters indicate the ≥30-bp overhang sequences used for Gibson assembly.