| Literature DB >> 34936529 |
David S Yeager1,2, Jamie M Carroll2,3, Jenny Buontempo2, Andrei Cimpian4, Spencer Woody5, Robert Crosnoe2,3, Chandra Muller2,3, Jared Murray6, Pratik Mhatre2, Nicole Kersting7, Christopher Hulleman8, Molly Kudym2,3, Mary Murphy9, Angela Lee Duckworth10, Gregory M Walton11, Carol S Dweck11.
Abstract
A growth-mindset intervention teaches the belief that intellectual abilities can be developed. Where does the intervention work best? Prior research examined school-level moderators using data from the National Study of Learning Mindsets (NSLM), which delivered a short growth-mindset intervention during the first year of high school. In the present research, we used data from the NSLM to examine moderation by teachers' mindsets and answer a new question: Can students independently implement their growth mindsets in virtually any classroom culture, or must students' growth mindsets be supported by their teacher's own growth mindsets (i.e., the mindset-plus-supportive-context hypothesis)? The present analysis (9,167 student records matched with 223 math teachers) supported the latter hypothesis. This result stood up to potentially confounding teacher factors and to a conservative Bayesian analysis. Thus, sustaining growth-mindset effects may require contextual supports that allow the proffered beliefs to take root and flourish.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; affordances; growth mindset; implicit theories; motivation; open data; open materials; preregistered; wise interventions
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34936529 PMCID: PMC8985222 DOI: 10.1177/09567976211028984
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Sci ISSN: 0956-7976