| Literature DB >> 34935195 |
Lijuan Li1, Shunjie Yu1, Shanshan Liu1, Fanqiao Meng1, Xiaotong Ren1, Zhaoyun Liu1, Rong Fu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of CD59 and fluorescently labeled aerolysin (FLAER) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear and requires further investigation. To explore the relationship between CD59, FLAER, and AML, we investigated CD59 and FLAER expression in AML and analyzed their relationship with clinical characteristics of AML patients.Entities:
Keywords: CD59; FLAER; acute myeloid leukemia; coagulation function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34935195 PMCID: PMC8761415 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
Characteristics of patients with AML (N = 161)
| Characteristic | Disease states | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete remission | Newly diagnosed | ||
| Sex, % | |||
| Male | 70 (43%) | ||
| Age, years | |||
| Median | 58 | ||
| Range | (16–80) | ||
| FAB, | |||
| M2 | 4 (3) | 4 (3) | 8 (6) |
| M3 | 42 (26) | 18 (11) | 60 (37) |
| M4 | 18 (11) | 34 (21) | 52 (32) |
| M5 | 13 (8) | 28 (17) | 41 (25) |
Abbreviation: FAB, French‐American‐British classifications.
Expression of CD59− and FLAER− after achieving CR in AML
| Group |
| Detected cell | CD59− (%) | FLAER− (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M3 | 10 | PC | 71.17 ± 24.24 | 62.33 ± 45.31 |
| M3‐CR | 10 | MC | 30.54 ± 24.02 | 19.39 ± 6.86 |
| M3 CR | 10 | GC | 9.45 ± 7.02 | 8.92 ± 8.84 |
| Non‐M3 | 9 | PC | 33.72 ± 22.93 | 32.04 ± 29.11 |
| Non‐M3 CR | 9 | MC | 15.91 ± 15.34 | 2.52 ± 1.67 |
| Non‐M3 CR | 9 | GC | 3.73 ± 3.56 | 0.68 ± 0.51 |
MC and PC were analyzed in CR group.
Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; GC, granulocytes; MC, monocytes; N, number of patients; PC, primordial cell.
Correlation analysis of CD59−, FLAER− ratio, and clinical indicators in peripheral blood of newly diagnosed AML
| Clinical index | M3 group CD59 | M3 group FLAER | Non‐M3 group CD59 | Non‐M3 FLAER | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| r |
| r |
| r |
| |
| WBC | 0.356 | 0.147 | 0.306 | 0.233 | 0.445 | 0.178 | 0.027 | 0.877 |
| PLT | −0.345 | 0.161 | −0.134 | 0.608 | −0.031 | 0.864 | −0.271 | 0.115 |
| PBPC | 0.66 | 0.003 | 0.291 | 0.258 | 0.22 | 0.226 | 0.187 | 0.283 |
| PT | −0.263 | 0.292 | −0.024 | 0.926 | −0.127 | 0.49 | −0.079 | 0.654 |
| APTT | −0.352 | 0.152 | −0.189 | 0.469 | −0.402 | 0.759 | −0.137 | 0.431 |
| TT | −0.044 | 0.863 | −0.386 | 0.126 | −0.231 | 0.204 | −0.151 | 0.387 |
| FIB | 0.307 | 0.215 | 0.28 | 0.277 | 0.013 | 0.943 | 0.096 | 0.583 |
| D‐Dimer | 0.105 | 0.679 | 0.055 | 0.833 | 0.037 | 0.84 | 0.046 | 0.792 |
| LDH | 0.315 | 0.203 | 0.264 | 0.306 | 0.447 | 0.116 | 0.156 | 0.37 |
Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB, fibrinogen; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PBPC, peripheral blood primordial cell; PLT, platelet; PT, prothrombin time; TT, thrombin time; WBC, white blood cell.
FIGURE 1Decline of CD59 and FLAER is low in PB of non‐M3 patients. (A) An example of a flow diagram for FLAER and CD59 analysis in non‐M3. All experiments were performed three times. Scatter plot of FLAER− (B) and CD59− (C) percent of PB samples in 101 non‐M3 patients (35 patients in CR group and 66 patients in newly diagnosed group). PC, primordial cell; MC, monocytes; GC, granulocytes. MC and PC were analyzed in CR group; PC was analyzed in the newly diagnosed group
FIGURE 2Decline of CD59 and FLAER is low in PB of M3 CR group patients. (A) An example of a flow diagram for FLAER and CD59 analysis in M3 CR group. All experiments were conducted three times. Scatter plot of CD59− (B) and FLAER− (C) percent of PB samples in 60 M3 patients (42 CR group patients). PC, primordial cell; MC, monocytes; GC, granulocytes. MC and PC were analyzed in CR group; PC was analyzed in the newly diagnosed group
FIGURE 3Decline of CD59 and FLAER is high in PB of AML patients. An example of a flow diagram for FLAER and CD59 analysis in M3 (A) and non‐M3 (B). All experiments were performed three times. Scatter plot of CD59− (C) and FLAER− (D) percent in 84 AML patients
CD59− and FLAER− ratio in AML
| Group |
| Detected cell | CD59− (%) | FLAER− (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M3 | 18 | PC | 72.96 ± 26.36 | 62.66 ± 39.98 |
| Non‐M3 | 66 | PC | 38.47 ± 27.49 | 33.69 ± 32.93 |
| M3 CR | 42 | MC | 21.20 ± 19.94 | 17.36 ± 17.18 |
| M3 CR | 42 | GC | 17.08 ± 12.89 | 15.20 ± 14.00 |
| Non‐M3 CR | 35 | MC | 21.88 ± 19.22 | 11.61 ± 11.10 |
| Non‐M3 CR | 35 | GC | 16.33 ± 14.33 | 2.59 ± 2.15 |
MC and PC were analyzed in CR group.
Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; GC, granulocytes; MC, monocytes; N, number of patients; PC, primordial cell.
Correlation analysis of CD59−, FLAER− ratio, and clinical indicators in peripheral blood of newly diagnosed AML
| Clinical index | CD59 group | FLAER group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD59− >10% | CD59− <10% |
| FLAER− >3% | FLAER− <3% |
| |
| WBC | 49.16 ± 34.07 | 50.29 ± 34.63 | 0.965 | 45.84 ± 34.58 | 49.06 ± 37.25 | 0.765 |
| PLT | 63.72 ± 42.45 | 70.57 ± 52.19 | 0.569 | 76.65 ± 23.87 | 91.43 ± 59.07 | 0.43 |
| PBPC | 47.79 ± 31.86 | 37.86 ± 36.72 | 0.253 | 50.96 ± 28.77 | 32.07 ± 30.96 | 0.487 |
| PT | 13.08 ± 1.22 | 12.63 ± 1.74 | 0.242 | 12.92 ± 1.40 | 12.63 ± 1.83 | 0.886 |
| APTT | 29.19 ± 3.06 | 28.85 ± 3.15 | 0.66 | 28.36 ± 2.28 | 29.50 ± 3.13 | 0.1 |
| TT | 19.76 ± 2.74 | 20.70 ± 2.60 | 0.162 | 20.32 ± 2.54 | 20.28 ± 2.87 | 0.954 |
| FIB | 3.69 ± 1.58 | 3.34 ± 1.19 | 0.325 | 3.55 ± 1.35 | 3.11 ± 1.01 | 0.165 |
| D‐Dimer | 1524.23 ± 1069.60 | 966.23 ± 562.39 | 0.035 | 1415.50 ± 1049.43 | 1059.48 ± 594.17 | 0.008 |
| LDH | 545.48 ± 304.66 | 368.67 ± 211.61 | 0.01 | 545.51 ± 257.10 | 421.65 ± 280.64 | 0.034 |
Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB, fibrinogen; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PBPC, peripheral blood primordial cell; PLT, platelet; PT, prothrombin time; TT, thrombin time; WBC, white blood cell.