Literature DB >> 34934606

Identifying diverse metal oxide nanomaterials with lethal effects on embryonic zebrafish using machine learning.

Richard Liam Marchese Robinson1, Haralambos Sarimveis2, Philip Doganis2, Xiaodong Jia1, Marianna Kotzabasaki2, Christiana Gousiadou2, Stacey Lynn Harper3,4,5, Terry Wilkins1.   

Abstract

Manufacturers of nanomaterial-enabled products need models of endpoints that are relevant to human safety to support the "safe by design" paradigm and avoid late-stage attrition. Increasingly, embryonic zebrafish (Danio Rerio) are recognised as a key human safety relevant in vivo test system. Hence, machine learning models were developed for identifying metal oxide nanomaterials causing lethality to embryonic zebrafish up to 24 hours post-fertilisation, or excess lethality in the period of 24-120 hours post-fertilisation, at concentrations of 250 ppm or less. Models were developed using data from the Nanomaterial Biological-Interactions Knowledgebase for a dataset of 44 diverse, coated and uncoated metal or, in one case, metalloid oxide nanomaterials. Different modelling approaches were evaluated using nested cross-validation on this dataset. Models were initially developed for both lethality endpoints using multiple descriptors representing the composition of the core, shell and surface functional groups, as well as particle characteristics. However, interestingly, the 24 hours post-fertilisation data were found to be harder to predict, which could reflect different exposure routes. Hence, subsequent analysis focused on the prediction of excess lethality at 120 hours-post fertilisation. The use of two data augmentation approaches, applied for the first time in nano-QSAR research, was explored, yet both failed to boost predictive performance. Interestingly, it was found that comparable results to those originally obtained using multiple descriptors could be obtained using a model based upon a single, simple descriptor: the Pauling electronegativity of the metal atom. Since it is widely recognised that a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic nanomaterial characteristics contribute to their toxicological effects, this is a surprising finding. This may partly reflect the need to investigate more sophisticated descriptors in future studies. Future studies are also required to examine how robust these modelling results are on truly external data, which were not used to select the single descriptor model. This will require further laboratory work to generate comparable data to those studied herein.
Copyright © 2021, Robinson et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data augmentation; embryonic zebrafish; machine learning; nano-QSAR; nanosafety

Year:  2021        PMID: 34934606      PMCID: PMC8649207          DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.12.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol        ISSN: 2190-4286            Impact factor:   3.649


  63 in total

1.  Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Andy Liaw; Christopher Tong; J Christopher Culberson; Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Nanoinformatics, and the big challenges for the science of small things.

Authors:  A S Barnard; B Motevalli; A J Parker; J M Fischer; C A Feigl; G Opletal
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Correlation-Based Framework for Extraction of Insights from Quantum Chemistry Databases: Applications for Nanoclusters.

Authors:  Johnatan Mucelini; Marcos G Quiles; Ronaldo C Prati; Juarez L F Da Silva
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive Nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps.

Authors:  Agnieszka Gajewicz
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Discovery of 6-substituted indole-3-glyoxylamides as lead antiprion agents with enhanced cell line activity, improved microsomal stability and low toxicity.

Authors:  Mark J Thompson; Jennifer C Louth; Steven Ferrara; Matthew P Jackson; Fiona J Sorrell; Edward J Cochrane; Joel Gever; Sarah Baxendale; B Michael Silber; Henry H Roehl; Beining Chen
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Tomasz Puzyn; Bakhtiyor Rasulev; Agnieszka Gajewicz; Xiaoke Hu; Thabitha P Dasari; Andrea Michalkova; Huey-Min Hwang; Andrey Toropov; Danuta Leszczynska; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  The potential anti-infective applications of metal oxide nanoparticles: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yasmin Abo-Zeid; Gareth R Williams
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  Importance of Choosing Relevant Biological End Points To Predict Nanoparticle Toxicity with Computational Approaches for Human Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Valérie Forest; Jean-François Hochepied; Jérémie Pourchez
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory.

Authors:  Marina E Vance; Todd Kuiken; Eric P Vejerano; Sean P McGinnis; Michael F Hochella; David Rejeski; Matthew S Hull
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  NanoTox: Development of a Parsimonious In Silico Model for Toxicity Assessment of Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles Using Physicochemical Features.

Authors:  Nilesh Anantha Subramanian; Ashok Palaniappan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.