| Literature DB >> 34934131 |
Benjamin Rolles1,2,3, Inga Wessels3, Panagiotis Doukas4, Drosos Kotelis4, Lothar Rink3, Margherita Vieri1,2, Fabian Beier1,2, Michael Jacobs4, Alexander Gombert5.
Abstract
Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is related to a relevant morbidity and in-hospital mortality rate. In this retrospective observational single-center study including serum zinc levels of 33 patients we investigated the relationship between zinc and patients' outcome following TAAA repair. Six patients died during the hospital stay (18%). These patients showed significantly decreased zinc levels before the intervention (zinc levels before intervention: 60.09 µg/dl [survivors] vs. 45.92 µg/dl [non-survivors]). The post-interventional intensive care SOFA-score (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) (at day 2) as well as the SAPS (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) (at day 2) showed higher score points in case of low pre-interventional zinc levels. No significant correlation between patient comorbidities and zinc level before intervention, except for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which was significantly correlated to reduced baseline zinc levels, was observed. Septic shock, pneumonia and urinary tract infections were not associated to reduced zinc levels preoperatively as well as during therapy. Patients with adverse outcome after TAAA repair showed reduced pre-interventional zinc levels. We speculate that decreased zinc levels before intervention may be related to a poorer outcome because of poorer physical status as well as negatively altered perioperative inflammatory response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34934131 PMCID: PMC8692510 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03877-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patients characteristics and procedural details.
| Characteristics | All patients (n = 33) | Survivors | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 27) | No (n = 6) | |||
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 63 ± 16.2 | 62.1 ± 16.6 | 67.2 ± 14.9 | 0.4986 |
| Sex (female) (n) | 51.52% (17) | 51.85% (14) | 50% (3) | 0.9371 |
| Body size, cm (mean ± SD) | 173.6 (12.6) | 173.7 (12.45) | 173.2 (14.46) | 0.9265 |
| Weight, kg (mean ± SD) | 76.89 (17.70) | 80.61 (16.78) | 60.17 (11.44) | 0.0082 |
| BMI, kg/m2 (mean ± SD) | 25.4 (5.05) | 26.6 (4.7) | 20 (2.29) | 0.0022 |
| Smoking (current) (n) | 36.36% (12) | 33.33% (9) | 50% (3) | 0.4585 |
| Coronary heart disease (n) | 42.42% (14) | 44.44% (12) | 33.33% (2) | 0.6314 |
| Peripheral arterial disease (n) | 12.12% (4) | 7.41% (2) | 33.33% (2) | 0.0829 |
| COPD (n) | 39.39% (13) | 40.74% (11) | 33.33% (2) | 0.7465 |
| Diabetes (n) | 18.18% (6) | 18.52% (5) | 16.67% (1) | 0.9185 |
| GAS (N) | 18.18% (6) | 18.52% (5) | 16.67% (1) | 0.9185 |
| Prior operations of the aorta (n) | 48.49% (16) | 93.75% (15) | 6.25% (1) | 0.0897 |
| Zinc (mean ± SD) | 57.52 (13.28) | 60.09 (12.06) | 45.92 (13.20) | 0.0154 |
| TAAA 1 (n) | 15.15% (5) | 18.52% (5) | 0% (0) | 0.2664 |
| TAAA 2 (n) | 21.21% (7) | 18.52% (5) | 33.33% (2) | 0.4379 |
| TAAA 3 (n) | 21.21% (7) | 22.22% (6) | 16.67% (1) | 0.7721 |
| TAAA 4 (n) | 30.30% (10) | 25.93% (7) | 50% (3) | 0.2595 |
| TAAA 5 (n) | 12.12% (4) | 14.81% (4) | 0% (0) | 0.3298 |
| Open intervention (n) | 42.42% (14) | 70.59% (12) | 33.33% (2) | 0.6314 |
| Overall stay in hospital, days (mean ± SD) | 29.06 (23.73) | 31 (22.08) | 22.5 (31.73) | 0.4629 |
| Duration of the intervention, min (mean ± SD) | 374.30 (111.03) | 356.52 (107.71) | 454.33 (95.80) | 0.0492 |
| Total ventilation time, min (mean ± SD) | 10,539.03 (25,818.35) | 7807 (21,592.99) | 22,831 (40,249.42) | 0.2021 |
| Infections (n) | 45.45% (15) | 44.44% (12) | 50% (3) | 0.8120 |
| Tracheotomy (n) | 12.12% (4) | 11.11% (3) | 16.67 (1) | 0.4910 |
| MACE (n) | 33.33% (11) | 29.62% (8) | 37.5% (3) | 0.3539 |
| AKI (n) | 51.52% (17) | 44.44% (12) | 83.33% (5) | 0.0897 |
| Total number of red blood cell transfusions (mean ± SD) | 13.76 (17.69) | 9.44 (10.68) | 33.17 (29.29) | 0.0017 |
| Total number of platelet transfusions (mean ± SD) | 2.88 (3.71) | 2.04 (2.81) | 6.67 (5.09) | 0.0039 |
Patients characteristics concerning demographics, pre-existing conditions, type of aneurysm, chosen procedure and complications. Shown are mean values ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage with total number in brackets.
COPD chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease, TAAA thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, MACE major adverse cardiac event, AKI acute kidney injury, GAS genetic aortic syndromes.
Significance was determined using Student's t-test assuming significance if *p < 0.05.
Figure 1(A) Zinc levels of all patients (n = 33) in correlation with the age before endovascular/surgical intervention are shown. The dashed lines show commonly used upper (70 µg/dl)/lower (150 µg/dl) standard values for the zinc level. (B) The zinc levels of patients that survived endovascular/surgical intervention and were released from the hospital (n = 27) were compared to patients that died during the hospital stay (n = 6). Zinc level was measured before endovascular/surgical intervention. Shown is the mean and SD. Significance was determined using Student's t-test assuming significance if *p < 0.05.
Figure 2(A) The SOFA-Score (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) of 32 patients after two days is shown. For one patient no SOFA-score could be obtained after two days. Accompanying the regression line (p = 0.0090). (B) The SAPS (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) for 32 patients after two days is demonstrated. For one patient no SAPS could be obtained on day two. Also shown is the regression line (p = 0.0010). (C) Demonstrated is the SOFA score after two days according to the point value < 10 points (n = 19) or ≥ 10 points (n = 13) (0.0099). (D) Shown is the SAPS score divided into patients with a score < 40 points (n = 26) or patients with ≥ 40 points (n = 6) (p = 0.0372).
Figure 3(A) Zinc levels before intervention of patients who had or did not have peripheral arterial disease (“PAD”; n = 4; p = 0.0494). (B) Mean zinc level of our patient cohort before the respective intervention depending on whether we assigned the patients to the group with proven (n = 5) or high suspicion (n = 1) of a genetic predisposition (“inherited”; n = 6; p = 0.9601) or to the group with high atherosclerosis burden ("high-risk"; n = 8; p = 0.0003). (C) Representation of the criteria that we used to categorize patients to the high-risk group (“high-risk”) or not (“normal”). Shown is the mean and SD. Significance was determined using Student's t-test assuming significance if *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.