| Literature DB >> 34934078 |
Leslie C Jellen1, Mechelle M Lewis1,2, Guangwei Du1, Xi Wang3, Martha L Escobar Galvis4, Stanislaw Krzyzanowski4, Colt D Capan4, Amanda M Snyder1, James R Connor1, Lan Kong3, Richard B Mailman1,2, Patrik Brundin4, Lena Brundin5,6, Xuemei Huang7,8,9,10,11.
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests nigral iron accumulation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), contributing to dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Converging evidence suggests this accumulation might be related to, or increased by, serotonergic dysfunction, a common, often early feature of the disease. We investigated whether lower plasma serotonin in PD is associated with higher nigral iron. We obtained plasma samples from 97 PD patients and 89 controls and MRI scans from a sub-cohort (62 PD, 70 controls). We measured serotonin concentrations using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and regional iron content using MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping. PD patients had lower plasma serotonin (p < 0.0001) and higher nigral iron content (SNc: p < 0.001) overall. Exclusively in PD, lower plasma serotonin was correlated with higher nigral iron (SNc: r(58) = - 0.501, p < 0.001). This correlation was significant even in patients newly diagnosed (< 1 year) and stronger in the SNc than any other region examined. This study reveals an early, linear association between low serotonin and higher nigral iron in PD patients, which is absent in controls. This is consistent with a serotonin-iron relationship in the disease process, warranting further studies to determine its cause and directionality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34934078 PMCID: PMC8692322 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03700-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort.
| Number of Subjects | Entire Cohort ( | MRI Cohort ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Parkinson’s | Group comparisons ( | Controls | Parkinson’s | Group comparisons ( | |
| 89 | 97 | 70 | 62 | |||
| Females (n, %)) | 47 (53%) | 48 (49%) | 0.650a | 38 (54%) | 32 (52%) | 0.759a |
| Age | 66.6 ± 10.3 | 67.0 ± 8.3 | 0.790b | 66.1 ± 10.3 | 65.8 ± 8.1 | 0.853b |
| BMI | 28.0 ± 4.7 | 27.2 ± 4.9 | 0.272b | 27.5 ± 4.6 | 26.7 ± 4.8 | 0.376b |
| Education (years) | 15.4 ± 2.6 | 14.8 ± 2.6 | 0.129b | 15.4 ± 2.6 | 14.7 ± 2.8 | 0.131b |
| Disease duration | – | 6.5 ± 6.5 | – | – | 5.3 ± 4.9 | – |
| LEDD | – | 686 ± 450 | – | – | 701 ± 443 | – |
| MDS UPDRS I | 3.7 ± 3.8 | 9.7 ± 7.2 | | 3.5 ± 3.5 | 7.8 ± 6.0 | |
| MDS UPDRS II | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 10.3 ± 9.7 | | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 6.9 | |
| MDS UPDRS III | 4.7 ± 5.5 | 27.2 ± 20.1 | 4.2 ± 4.1 | 21.7 ± 13.3 | ||
| MDS UPDRS IV | – | 2.3 ± 3.2 | – | – | 2.4 ± 3.1 | – |
| FOG-Q | – | 6.1 ± 5.4 | – | – | 5.2 ± 4.8 | – |
| UPSIT | 32.1 ± 6.5 | 19.2 ± 7.5 | 44.2 ± 5.5 | 61.4 ± 20.8 | ||
| PDQ-39 | 44.6 ± 7.7 | 67.3 ± 4.7 | 32.8 ± 6.2 | 19.0 ± 7.8 | | |
| MOCA | 25.4 ± 2.4 | 23.8 ± 3.8 | 25.5 ± 2.5 | 24.5 ± 3.0 | ||
| ESS | 5.8 ± 3.8 | 7.9 ± 4.7 | 5.8 ± 3.6 | 7.1 ± 4.4 | 0.076b | |
| SSRI/SNRI use | 7 (8%) | 31 (32%) | | 4 (6%) | 16 (26%) | |
| HDRS | 2.7 ± 3.2 | 6.1 ± 4.9 | | 2.8 ± 3.3 | 5.1 ± 4.5 | |
| HARS | 4.0 ± 4.3 | 8.2 ± 6.2 | | 4.2 ± 4.4 | 6.9 ± 5.8 | |
The data for the entire cohort (89 controls, 97 Parkinson’s) and subset with MRI data (MRI cohort, 70 controls, 62 Parkinson’s). Data reflect mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Two-tailed p-values indicate results of chi-square testa or independent-sample t-testb.
BMI body mass index, LEDD levodopa equivalent daily dosage, PDQ-39 39 Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, MDS UPDRS Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, I non-motor experiences of daily living, II motor experiences of daily living, III motor examination, IV motor dysfunction, FOG-Q Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, PDQ-39 39 Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, UPSIT University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, MOCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, ESS Epworth Sleepiness Scale, HDRS Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HARS Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale.
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 1Group differences in (a) plasma serotonin (5-HT) concentrations and (b) nigral iron content (reflected by QSM values) between PD patients and controls. P-values indicate results of independent samples t-tests (two-tailed). White box and error bars indicate mean and 95% CI. Box and whisker plots reflect median and interquartile range. Dashed horizontal line marks lowest tertile of serotonin concentrations in PD group. Figure was produced using the ggplot2 package[80] in R (version 3.5.3)[81].
Figure 2The association between plasma serotonin (5-HT) concentrations and QSM values, reflecting iron content, in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) (a) in PD patients and controls, and (b) within PD patients by disease stage. Unadjusted Pearson’s r and p-values are indicated. Dashed line marks lowest tertile of serotonin concentrations in PD patients. Figure was produced using the ggplot2 package[80] in R (version 3.5.3)[81].
Figure 3Within PD patients, plasma serotonin’s association with QSM values in the SNc compared to other regions of interest. Loess curves are fitted to the data. Unadjusted Pearson’s correlation coefficients and p-values are indicated, uncorrected for multiple comparisons (N = 62). Scales on y-axis differ by region based on regional distributions. The dashed line marks the lowest tertile of patients in terms of serotonin concentrations. Figure was produced using the ggplot2 package[80] in R (version 3.5.3)[81].
Figure 4Within PD patients, plasma serotonin and nigral iron (as reflected by QSM values) by SSRI/SNRI use and their association with each other within SSRI/SNRI subgroups (a), (b). P-values indicate results of ANCOVA with age and sex as covariates (p-values > 0.05 not shown). Box and error bars indicate age and sex-adjusted mean and 95% CI. (c) Unadjusted Pearson’s correlations. Dashed line marks lowest tertile of serotonin concentrations in PD group. Figure was produced using the ggplot2 package[80] in R (version 3.5.3)[81].