Literature DB >> 34933891

Optimizing Immuno-PET Imaging of Tumor PD-L1 Expression: Pharmacokinetic, Biodistribution, and Dosimetric Comparisons of 89Zr-Labeled Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Formats.

Alizée Bouleau1, Hervé Nozach2, Steven Dubois2, Dimitri Kereselidze1, Céline Chevaleyre1, Cheng-I Wang3, Michael J Evans4, Vincent Lebon1, Bernard Maillère2, Charles Truillet5.   

Abstract

PET imaging of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) may help to noninvasively predict and monitor responses to anti-programmed cell death 1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies. In this study, we compared the imaging characteristics of 3 radioligands derived from the anti-PD-L1 IgG1 complement 4 (C4). In addition to the IgG C4, we produced a fragment antigen-binding (Fab) C4, as well as a double-mutant IgG C4 (H310A/H435Q) with minimal affinity for the murine neonatal Fc receptor.
Methods: The pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and dosimetry of the 3 89Zr-labeled C4 ligands were compared by longitudinal PET/CT imaging in nude mice bearing subcutaneous human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts with positive (H1975 model) or negative (A549 model) endogenous PD-L1 expression.
Results: The C4 radioligands substantially accumulated in PD-L1-positive tumors but not in PD-L1-negative tumors or in blocked PD-L1-positive tumors, confirming their PD-L1-specific tumor targeting. 89Zr-Fab C4 and 89Zr-IgG C4 (H310A/H435Q) were rapidly eliminated compared with 89Zr-IgG C4. Consequently, maximal tumor-to-muscle ratios were obtained earlier, at 4 h after injection for 89Zr-Fab C4 (ratio, ∼6) and 24 h after injection for 89Zr-IgG C4 (H310A/H435Q) (ratio, ∼9), versus 48 h after injection for 89Zr-IgG C4 (ratio, ∼8). Background activity in nontumor tissues was low, except for high kidney retention of 89Zr-Fab C4 and persistent liver accumulation of 89Zr-IgG C4 (H310A/H435Q) compared with 89Zr-IgG C4. Dosimetry estimates suggested that the C4 radioligands would yield organ-absorbed doses tolerable for repeated clinical PET imaging studies.
Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of designing radioligands with shorter pharmacokinetics for PD-L1 immuno-PET imaging in a preclinical model and encourages further clinical translation of such radioligands.
© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSCLC; PD-L1; PET; immunotherapy; non–small cell lung cancer; pharmacokinetics; programmed cell death ligand 1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34933891      PMCID: PMC9364342          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   11.082


  29 in total

1.  Radioiodinated versus radiometal-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen single-chain Fv-Fc antibody fragments: optimal pharmacokinetics for therapy.

Authors:  Vania Kenanova; Tove Olafsen; Lawrence E Williams; Nora H Ruel; Jeffrey Longmate; Paul J Yazaki; John E Shively; David Colcher; Andrew A Raubitschek; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Mapping the site on human IgG for binding of the MHC class I-related receptor, FcRn.

Authors:  J K Kim; M Firan; C G Radu; C H Kim; V Ghetie; E S Ward
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine.

Authors:  Maria J W D Vosjan; Lars R Perk; Gerard W M Visser; Marianne Budde; Paul Jurek; Garry E Kiefer; Guus A M S van Dongen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Paul Baas; Dong-Wan Kim; Enriqueta Felip; José L Pérez-Gracia; Ji-Youn Han; Julian Molina; Joo-Hang Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Myung-Ju Ahn; Margarita Majem; Mary J Fidler; Gilberto de Castro; Marcelo Garrido; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Ellie Im; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: response evaluation and biomarker development.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Hiroto Hatabu; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  IDAC-Dose 2.1, an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Martin Andersson; Lennart Johansson; Keith Eckerman; Sören Mattsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  The Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn): A Misnomer?

Authors:  Michal Pyzik; Kine M K Sand; Jonathan J Hubbard; Jan Terje Andersen; Inger Sandlie; Richard S Blumberg
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Mechanisms and Future of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Tianhao Zhu; Xunxia Bao; Mingyu Chen; Rui Lin; Jianan Zhuyan; Timing Zhen; Kaichen Xing; Wei Zhou; Sibo Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Effective dose estimation for oncological and neurological PET/CT procedures.

Authors:  Josep M Martí-Climent; Elena Prieto; Verónica Morán; Lidia Sancho; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Javier Arbizu; María J García-Velloso; José A Richter
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Antibody or Antibody Fragments: Implications for Molecular Imaging and Targeted Therapy of Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Katerina T Xenaki; Sabrina Oliveira; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac imaging techniques for the assessment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiotoxicity and their potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Yi Li; Pei-Jun Liu; Zhuo-Li Zhang; Yi-Ning Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.