| Literature DB >> 34933574 |
Tsuyoshi Tajika1, Takuro Kuboi2, Noboru Oya2, Fumitaka Endo2, Hitoshi Shitara2, Tsuyoshi Ichinose2, Tsuyoshi Sasaki2, Noritaka Hamano2, Hirotaka Chikuda2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate whether psychological status is associated with upper-extremity health status in an elderly general population.Entities:
Keywords: depression; elderly general population; functional disability; quickdash; symptom severity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34933574 PMCID: PMC8724993 DOI: 10.1177/00469580211059952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inquiry ISSN: 0046-9580 Impact factor: 1.730
Characteristics of Participants According to Age Cluster.
| Age group | Total examined member | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Body mass index (g/cm2) | Dominant grip (kg) | Non-dominant grip (kg) | QuickDASH score | GDS-S-J score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | ||||||||
| Age | ||||||||
| 60–69 | 40 | 164.0 (5.1) | 66.0 (7.6) | 24.5 (2.4) | 34.9 (6.3) | 33.9 (6.6) | 3.4 (5.0) | 2.2 (2.2) |
| 70–79 | 13 | 163.1 (4.9) | 62.3 (8.9) | 23.4 (2.9) | 31.9 (6.9) | 31.5 (5.4) | 6.3 (8.9) | 2.3 (2.0) |
| 80≤ | 23 | 158.0 (5.6)
| 56.6 (7.0)
| 22.6 (1.8)
| 25.5 (4.9)
| 24.9 (5.3)
| 4.1 (5.5) | 3.3 (3.0) |
| Total | 76 | 163.5 (6.4) | 64.3 (9.1) | 24.0 (2.4) | 33.3 (8.1) | 32.7 (8.0) | 4.1 (6.0) | 2.5 (2.5) |
| Women | ||||||||
| 60–69 | 61 | 152.9 (6.2) | 53.9 (8.1) | 23.1 (3.2) | 19.7 (4.9) | 19.7 (4.9) | 5.8 (8.3) | 2.6 (3.0) |
| 70–79 | 43 | 148.6 (4.9) | 51.5 (7.8) | 23.3 (3.4) | 18.2 (3.6) | 18.2 (3.6) | 8.5 (11.0) | 2.3 (1.7) |
| 80≤ | 20 | 144.7 (4.9)
| 50.1 (6.7) | 23.9 (3.4) | 16.2 (3.6)
| 16.1 (3.6)
| 15.3 (14.6)
| 4.4 (1.7)
|
| Total | 124 | 152.1 (7.4) | 53.7 (8.5) | 23.2 (3.4) | 19.8 (5.1) | 19.8 (5.1) | 7.9 (10.2) | 2.9 (2.8) |
Mean values are shown with the standard deviation.
SD: standard deviation.
aSignificantly different (P < 0.05) from values of the 60s age group.
bSignificantly different (P < 0.05) from values of the 70s age group.
Results of Correlation Between Clinical Findings for Participants.
| Age | Height | Weight | Body mass index | Dominant grip | Non-dominant grip | QuickDASH score | GDS-S-J score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1 | |||||||
| Height | −0.25 | 1 | ||||||
| Weight | −0.21 | 0.66 | 1 | |||||
| Body mass index | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 1 | ||||
| Dominant grip | −0.21 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.13 | 1 | |||
| Non-dominant grip | −0.2 | 0.74 | 0.6 | 0.17 | 0.86 | 1 | ||
| QuickDASH score | 0.07 | −0.21 | −0.25 | −0.14 | −0.36 | −0.33 | 1 | |
| GDS-S-J score | 0.2 | −0.14 | −0.18 | −0.09 | −0.15 | −0.21 | 0.25 | 1 |
Values are means (SD).
Significant P < 0.05.
Significant P < 0.01.
Characteristics of Participants in the Degree of GDS-J Score.
| GDS score 0–5 | GDS score 6–8 | GDS9≤ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Men | 66 | 8 | 2 | 0.56 |
| Women | 104 | 15 | 5 | |
| Age | 65.5 (11.8) | 68.4 (14.2) | 65.6 (14.3) | 0.48 |
| Height | 155.1 (8.2) | 152.6 (8.9) | 153.6 (9.5) | 0.49 |
| Weight | 56.9 (9.6) | 52.5 (9.3) | 53.7 (6.3) | 0.14 |
| BMI | 23.6 (2.9) | 22.5 (3.1) | 22.8 (1.7) | 0.22 |
| Dominant grip | 24.4 (8.2) | 23.1 (7.5) | 18.2 (6.8) | 0.16 |
| Non-dominant grip | 23.7 (8.4) | 21.0 (6.4) | 19.0 (6.9) | 0.2 |
| QuickDASH score | 5.8 (8.3) | 8.5 (11.0) | 15.3 (14.6) | 0.04 |
Values are means (SD).
Significantly different (P < 0.05) from values of the GDS score 0-5 group.
Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with the GDS Score.
| Dominant hand grip model | Non-domimant hand grip model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ß | Variable | ß | ||
| Gender | −0.46 | 0.49 | Gender | −0.72 | 0.29 |
| Age | 0.03 | 0.28 | Age | 0.02 | 0.39 |
| Height | −0.002 | 0.96 | Height | −0.001 | 0.99 |
| Weight | −0.018 | 0.50 | Weight | −0.013 | 0.63 |
| Dominant hand grip | −0.027 | 0.51 | Nondomimant hand grip | −0.05 | 0.18 |
| QuickDASH score | 0.06 | 0.005 | Quick DASH score | 0.06 | 0.006 |
P < 0.01