Adverse events following the first dose of Covishield (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccination among health workers in selected districts of central and western Nepal: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed at exploring the adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and their incidences among health workers in three different districts of central and western Nepal following the first dose of Covishield vaccine,. It also aimed at studying the association of AEFI with demographic and clinical characteristics of vaccinees, pre-vaccination anxiety level and prior history of COVID-19 infection (RT- PCR confirmed) status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study carried out via face-to-face or telephonic interview among 1006 health workers one week after receiving their first dose of the Covishield vaccine. Incidence of adverse events was calculated in percentage while Chi-square Test was used to check the association of AEFI with independent variables. Logistic regression was used to find out the adjusted odd's ratio at 95% CI.
RESULTS: Incidence of AEFI was 79.8% with local and systemic AEFI being 68.0% and 59.7% respectively. Injection site tenderness was the commonest manifestation. Local and systemic symptoms resolved in less than one week among 96.8% and 98.7% vaccinees respectively. Females were more likely to develop AEFI than males (AOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2-2.4). Vaccinees aged 45-59 years were 50% less likely to develop AEFI as compared to those aged less than 30 years (AOR 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.8). Most of the vaccinees had not undergone RT-PCR testing for COVID-19 (59.8%). Those who were not tested for COVID-19 prior were 1.5 odds more likely to develop AEFI compared to those who were negative (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1).
CONCLUSION: More than two-third of the vaccinees developed one or more forms of adverse events, but most events were self-limiting. Females and young adults were more prone to develop AEFI.

Introduction

COVID-19 is an acute respiratory illness caused by a highly transmissible and pathogenic novel virus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. It started as an outbreak in Wuhan, China and was declared a pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 [2]. As of 11th October 2021, 237,383,711 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 4,842,716 deaths have been reported to WHO [3]. Meanwhile, the number of confirmed cases in Nepal was 802,861 with 11,243 total deaths [4]. The number of confirmed cases in Nepal was 272,840 with 2,055 deaths as of 16 February 2021, 07:00:00 hours, which amounts to a 194.2% rise in the number of cases and a 447.1% rise in mortality in about eight months [4]. This rise in the number of cases could be mainly due to the porous border with India and the increased transmissibility of new variant of coronavirus which has led to an alarming surge of cases in the second wave [5]. Additionally, poor hand hygiene measures, inappropriate use of masks, inadequate rigor in maintaining social distancing and inability to maintain isolation protocols could have led to the increase of cases in Nepal [6,7].

Various treatment options like remdesivir, antivirals, antimalarials, steroids, cytokine inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma therapy have been proposed for the remedy of COVID-19. However, none of them have been found to be effective in curing the disease, albeit clinical benefits have been observed [8]. Herd immunity via mass vaccination is the most promising method to combat the pandemic of COVID-19 although vaccination has not been able to reach all the population [9,10]. A lot of scientific rigor has therefore been put into the invention of the vaccine against coronavirus. COVID-19 vaccine is the fastest developed vaccine in history with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine being approved for emergency use on December 2 in UK just a year after the first case was reported in China [11-13]. As of September 16,37 vaccines have completed Phase III trial and 22 vaccines have been approved for use by at least one country [14]. Nearly 5.71 billion COVID-19 vaccines have been administered worldwide until September 13 [15]. However, the efficacy rate of different vaccines against different variants of COVID-19 has been varied [16]. COVID-19 vaccination rolled out in Nepal on 27th January 2020 with frontline workers including health workers and security personnel being vaccinated in the first phase [17]. The vaccine administered was ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Covishield vaccine) which is an adenovirus vector vaccine [18]. Inactivated Vero cell vaccine manufactured in China was introduced in the second phase [19]. Covishield vaccine is one of the recombinant vaccines developed by Oxford University and manufactured by Serum Institute of India. AstraZeneca vaccine belongs to the same generic group, although the manufacturers vary; they are considered completely equivalent by WHO Interim guidelines [20].

Some degree of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) has been reported with all of the vaccines developed to date with COVID-19 vaccination being no exception. Following the first dose of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccination, injection site reactions were reported in 65.4% and systemic reactions were reported in 48%, whereas 73.9% injection site reactions and 51.7% systemic reactions were reported after the first dose of Moderna Vaccination [21]. A study conducted using COVID Symptom Study app in the UK showed the incidence of local and systemic reactions as 58.7% and 33.7% respectively following the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine [22]. Another study done among health workers in Korea using the Mobile Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (MVAERS) showed an AEFI of 66.1% following the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine [23]. A study done by Shrestha et al in one of the largest tertiary hospitals in central Nepal showed an 85.04% incidence of AEFI following first dose of Covishield vaccination [24]. There is a lack of sufficient evidence regarding the safety profile of various vaccines. Insufficient evidences lead to vaccine hesitancy in public, There are speculations that adequate vaccine coverage might not be achieved despite vaccine availability due to vaccine hesitancy [25].

This study was carried out among a large pool of healthcare workers vaccinated during the first phase in three different districts in central and western Nepal. It aimed to explore the incidence of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with the Covishield vaccine, the association of AEFI with vaccinees’ demographic attributes, prior COVID-19 vaccine anxiety and prior COVID-19 infection status.

Materials and methods

Design

This was a cross-sectional study carried among frontline health care workers in three different districts (Bara, Rolpa and Syangja) of central and western Nepal.

Setting

General setting

Nepal is a small landlocked country situated in the South East Asia between India and China. Nepal has an area of 147,516 km2 and an estimated population of 29,136,808 which constitutes 0.37% of world’s population.

The day, before the vaccination was rolled out in Nepal (26 January 2021, 07:00:00 hours), 269,788 confirmed cases and 2,011 deaths were reported to WHO and the total number of RT-PCR tests done were 2,048,113 [26].

Specific setting

This study was carried out in three different districts (Rolpa, Bara and Syangja) of central and western Nepal. Bara is one of the districts in Terai belt and situated in Province no. 2 of central Nepal. Syangja and Rolpa are two hilly districts and are situated in province no. 4 and 5 of western and mid-western Nepal, respectively.

The first phase of vaccination was carried out in district hospitals of these districts under the supervision of respective District Health Offices (DHOs). A medical officer designated as AEFI surveillance officer was responsible to monitor and manage AEFIs. Vaccines were stored in DHOs, and a cold chain was maintained at 2–8▪C.

Study population

All health workers, working in public and private health facilities including doctors, nurses, paramedics, Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) and sanitation workers/office assistants, who had received the first dose of Covishield vaccine, were included. Health workers who were out of the station and those who refused to provide consent were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling technique

Since no studies were conducted during the first dose of vaccination, sample size was calculated considering a prevalence of 50%, 20% allowable error and 95% Confidence Interval by using one proportion formula . The total sample size calculated was 100. The detailed elaboration of sample size calculation is as follows:

n = total sample size

Z = reliability coefficient. Its value for 95% confidence interval is 1.96. So, on squaring it comes out to be 3.84. Hence, we have considered 4 in round off.

p = the proportion in population possessing the characteristics of interest. However, in this study we couldn’t find the prevalence of AEF (p) for sample size calculation, so we kept 50% in the formula to yield maximum value of n.

q = compliment of p = 100−P = 100−50 = 50%

L = Permissible error where we have considered 20% of p (20% of 50 = 10) to keep the power of our study at and above 80% at 95% CI.

Hence,

However, we enrolled 1006 health workers in the final analysis ( The samples were selected purposively through record review maintained at DHO.

Variables studied

We considered age, gender, comorbid conditions, pre-vaccination anxiety status, and prior COVID infection status as risk factors; the Covishield vaccine as the exposure; AEFI, medication and hospitalization rates due to AEFI as outcome variables. Content validity was ensured by consulting with infectious disease experts.

Data collection

Data was collected through semi-structured questionnaires via face-to-face interview and/or by telephonic survey. Basic demographic profile such as age, gender, profession, and telephone number of the health workers were extracted from the DHO of three districts maintained at password protected computer. Face to face interview was conducted by visiting different health facilities with adequate measures for COVID-19 prevention. Whenever there was difficulty in conducting face to face interviews, telephonic interviews were conducted. Data collection was done by the principal investigator and the co-investigators after discussing in the online platform (Zoom) and reviewing the responses every day.

Data entry and analysis

Data were collected through mobile based application named KoBoCollect v1.30.1 and extracted into Excel sheet. Appropriate commands were used for data cleaning. Entered data was analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17. Demographic and clinical characteristics were presented in the form of frequency and percentages. AEFI, timing of onset and duration were presented as frequency, percentage, and bar diagram. Bivariate analysis Chi-Square test was used to see the association of various independent variables with the AEFI. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to see the association of the AEFI with various independent variables. A p-value cut-off of 0.2 was used to include variables in the regression model. All the data were presented as Odd’s ratio (OR) and Adjusted Odd’s ratio (AOR) at 95% confidence Interval (CI).

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was taken from the Nepal Health Research council which is the apex body of research in Nepal (Reference no. 2350). Written consent was taken from vaccinees with whom a face-to-face interview was done. Due to difficult topography and Covid-19 imposed mobility restrictions, a telephonic interview was conducted instead of face-to-face interview for some participants. All the participants were explained about the objectives of this research and the possible risks and benefits of participating in the study before the interview. They were also assured that their participation was entirely voluntary and they could quit the interview at any stage. Written informed consent was obtained for a face-to-face interview. For a telephonic interview, verbal consent was taken and recorded during the beginning of telephonic interview.

Operational definition

Adverse events following immunization (AEFI): It refers to any medical response (local or system) that occurs following immunization that may not necessarily have a causal relationship with the administration of vaccine.

Anxiety status: Measurement of level of anxiety using a 4 point Likert scale for Anxiety (known as GAD-2 scale): 1 = not at all, 2 = Several days, 3 = more than half the days and 4 = nearly every day.

Allergic history: The history of reactions like itching, rashes or shortness of breath following intake of any food or drugs in the past.

Myalgia/Body ache: Sensation of pain all over the body

Fatigue: Feeling of weakness and tiredness

Results

Out of 1098 participants, 1006 consented to participate in the study. The response rates for face-to-face and telephonic interviews were 95% and 90% respectively. There was the predominance of female participants (58%). The mean age± SD of the participants was 34.5±10.8 years with most participants belonging to age group of < 30 years (41.8%). Most of the participants were paramedics (35.5%) followed by FCHVs (25.4%) (

About 9.5% of participants have one or more co-morbidities. Hypertension (59.4%) and Diabetes (30.2%) were commonly identified comorbidities. Prior to the 1st dose of vaccination 5.3% of total participants tested positive for COVID-19 detected through RT-PCR while 34.8% were tested negative. The remaining fraction had not undergone RT-PCR testing. Regarding the pre-vaccination anxiety level, 10% of the participants have moderate to very much anxiety level before vaccination. More than one-third of the participants (35.7%) took medicine and paracetamol was the most commonly used medication which constituted 71.6% of total medication. 8.6% of vaccinees had to take leave due to AEFI while 1.9% required hospital visit/hospitalization. When inquired regarding the perception of the safety of vaccine, 69.9% of the vaccinees considered the Covishield vaccine to be safe. 29.6% mentioned that they were not sure of its safety and 0.5% mentioned that they were unsafe (

The incidence of AEFI among participants receiving 1st dose of Covishield vaccination was 79.4%. Majority of participants have both local and systemic reactions (48.3%). Injection site tenderness (60.3%) and fever (38.2%) were the most common local and systemic reactions. Most of the participants (16.3%) had a combination of two reactions which may be either local and/or systemic (

Majority of the participants developed local (65.4%) and systemic (73.2%) reactions within 1–12 hours following vaccination. However, the reaction subsided in less than 72 hours (

Local (31.9%) and systematic (36.1%) reactions of the majority of the participants subsided in 2 days which subsequently got negligible after 7 days (

Those variables whose P value is < 0.2 were considered for multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, those who were aged 45–59 years were 50% less likely to develop AEFI compared to those who were < 30 years. (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3–0.8). Females were 1.9 odds more likely to develop AEFI compared to males (AOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2–2.4). Similarly, those who were not tested for COVID-19 prior were 1.5 odds more likely to develop AEFI compared to those who were negative (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1–2.1). Those who have pre- vaccination anxiety were 1.6 odds more likely to develop AEFI (AOR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.2–2.2) (

Discussion

In our study, the incidence of AEFI following the first dose of Covishield vaccination was found to be 79.4%. This finding is quite similar to a study done by Shrestha et al at one of the largest tertiary hospitals of Nepal which reported an 85.0% incidence of AEFI following the first dose of the same vaccine [24]. Another study done among health workers in Korea using the Mobile Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (MVAERS) showed a considerably high AEFI of 98.1% following the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine [24]. One possible explanation on this significant incidence could be the fact that this survey was based on a passive reporting system. So, only those developing AEFI tended to report. This is supported by the fact that out of 1,503 health care workers who were vaccinated, the data of 994 vaccinees were only reported in the MVAERS.

The frequency of local reactions was similar to systemic reactions (ratio 1.1), and almost half of vaccinees (48.3%) had both local and systemic reactions. The proportion of vaccinees developing local and systemic reactions was similar in other studies too [22,23]. Amongst those developing AEFI, most of the vaccinees had 2 or more categories of reactions, regardless of whether it is a local or systemic one. Injection site tenderness was the commonest local symptom and fever was the commonest local symptom. In some studies, myalgia is more common than fever [27]. Most cases of fever, myalgia and local site pain have improved with paracetamol alone. Paracetamol was also the most commonly used medication in most of the previous studies [28,29]. According to our study, common symptoms (incidence rate more than 10%) were injection site tenderness, injection site pain, myalgia, fever, headache, chills, dizziness, and drowsiness. Nausea/vomiting, injection site swelling, and irritable mood were common symptoms (incidence between 1 to 10%). Diarrhea, rashes, and shortness of breath were uncommon symptoms (incidence less than 1%). These findings are very similar to the study by Shrestha et al except that dizziness which is a very common AEFI in our study is a common AEFI in their cohort [24]. A study done among health care workers in three university hospitals of Korea showed that systemic reactions following vaccination were more common after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine compared to Pfizer but there was no difference in terms of local reaction [27]. Most of the symptoms started within 12 hours and resolved in less than 3 days.

Most of the cases in our study were mild to moderate. None of them required long-term hospitalization and no deaths were reported within a week. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine has been linked to thromboembolic events and clotting abnormalities [30,31]. Astrazaneca vaccine was suspended in many countries due to thromboembolic risk [32]. No cases suggestive of deep vein thrombosis, focal neurological deficit, cardiac event and bleeding were reported from our study participants within one week following vaccination. This, being a cross-sectional study, however, the long term sequelae after vaccination could not be studied.

Compared to vaccinees aged less than 30 years, those aged 30–44 years were found to have a greater risk of developing AEFI (AOR 1.1) while those aged 44–59 years and more than 60 years were found to be at a lesser risk (AOR 0.5 and 0.6 respectively). There is no clear consensus on whether age is a determinant of AEFI. A randomized clinical trial in UK showed a lower reactogenicity with lower side effect profile in older adults than young adults [33] while few studies report greater AEFI rates among young adults compared to the older ones [22,23]. Few previous studies exhibit no significant association between age and AEFI [24].

Females were found to be 73% more likely to develop AEFI compared to males. Female preponderance to AEFI has been reported in many similar studies [22,34]. This could be potentially due to the fact that women are considered to have a more robust immune response and mount greater cell-mediated as well as humoral immune response following antigenic stimulation by vaccination or infection when compared to males [35]. A study has shown that antibody titer following vaccination with H1N1 vaccine was greater among females compared to males and the titer was directly linked with the level of serum estradiol [36].

Comorbid conditions did not play in terms of AEFI incidence in our study as in most other similar studies [22,24,37]. A study done among health care workers in Kerala showed an increased risk of AEFI among individuals with Bronchial Asthma but no statistically significant association with other comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, heart disease or immunological disorder [37].

More than half (57.1%) of the vaccinees had some level of anxiety before getting vaccinated. In fact, anxiety over a newly launched vaccine had led to significant vaccine hesitancy and many health workers did not get vaccinated in the first phase [25]. AEFI was found to be significantly associated with pre-vaccination anxiety status. Anxiety-related stress response can be a likely cause; but since it is a diagnosis of exclusion, no definitive statement can be made unless other causes are ruled out [38]. All vaccinees who had any history of allergy in the past developed one or more adverse events after vaccination. However, none of them developed life-threatening anaphylaxis. A recent research in JAMA network states that even highly allergic individuals can take Pfizer vaccine; however vaccination should be strictly under medical supervision and requires special precautions [39].

The rate of hospital visit is quite low [1.9%] in our study. There could be two-fold explanations for this fact. It could be either because the symptoms were mild and not severe enough to require hospital visit. The other likely reason could be that since this study was done among health workers, they were themselves aware of the possible side effects and were capable of self-medication. The second explanation is supported by the fact that 35.7% mentioned taking medications while only 1.9% reported hospital visits. The rate of self-medication was 55.6% in the study by Shrestha et.al which is quite high as compared to our study [24].

During our assessment of the perception of safety of the vaccine, two-thirds of the vaccinees considered the Covishield vaccine to be safe, while almost one-third mentioned that they were not sure of its safety. The significant proportion of uncertainty could be because this was a new vaccine and health workers were the first to be vaccinated. But despite the uncertainty, most of the vaccinees [98.7%] showed their willingness to get the second dose. This can be because health workers are better aware of the process of immunogenicity of vaccine and that incomplete administration could lead to vaccine failure.

Strength and limitations

This is the first study in Nepal related to AEFI that covers a wide socio-geographic and demographic setting.

Data was obtained via investigator-led interview method in contrast to most other studies that are done by application or mobile-based reporting system.

Data was collected from the respondents one week following vaccination and hence there are chances of recall bias.

This is a cross sectional study therefore long term sequelae of COVID vaccine could not be studied.

Large sample size and wide geographic and demographic coverage make our data more representative of the population. However, this research was conducted among a pool of health workers only. The level of knowledge regarding vaccine, possible AEFI and medications are definitely higher among health workers as compared to general public. This could limit the generalizability of our study findings.

Conclusion

More than two-thirds of vaccinees have reported one or other type of adverse reactions after vaccination, but most of the reactions were nonserious and self-limiting. Females and young adults were more likely to develop AEFI. Comorbidity had no association with AEFI. Since majority of the vaccinees were not tested for Covid infection by RT-PCR technique, the relation of AEFI with prior infection could not be firmly ascertained.

Covishield being the new vaccine, there could be higher vaccine hesitancy due to fear of adverse events. Our study showed that none of the adverse events were serious and most of the AEFI resolved within one week. This could alleviate vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination coverage among public.

COVID-19 questionnaire version 12 PBG.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the participants receiving 1st dose of Covishield vaccine (n = 1006).

Characteristics	Participants	Percentage (%)
Gender
Male	423	42.0
Female	583	58.0
Age groups (Years)
<30	420	41.7
30–44	372	37.0
45–59	193	19.2
≥60	21	2.1
Mean age± SD = 34.5±10.8 years
Professions
Doctors	70	7.0
Nurses	202	20.1
Paramedics	357	35.5
FCHVs	256	25.4
Office Assistants	121	12.0

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of the participants receiving 1st dose of Covishield vaccine (n = 1006).

Characteristics	Participants	Percentage (%)
Co-morbidities Status
No	910	90.5
Yes	96	9.5
Types of Co-morbidities 1
Hypertension	57	59.4
Diabetes	29	30.2
COPD	5	5.2
Thyroid disorders	16	16.7
Heart Disease	4	4.2
Dyslipidemia	4	4.2
Psychiatric Illness	4	4.2
Rheumatoid arthritis	2	2.0
HIV	1	1.0
COVID-19 RT-PCR Status 2
Not tested	603	59.9
Negative Status	350	34.8
Positive Status	53	5.3
Anxiety status 3
Not at all	432	42.9
Several days	462	45.9
More than half the days	95	9.4
Nearly every day	17	1.7
Allergy history 4
No	926	92.0
Yes	19	1.9
Can’t remember	61	6.1
Medication for reactions 5
No	647	64.3
Yes	359	35.7
Leave following reactions 5
No	920	91.4
Yes	86	8.6
Hospital visit/Hospitalization 5
No	987	98.1
Yes	19	1.9
Perception of vaccine safety
No	6	0.6
Yes	702	69.8
Not sure	298	29.6

1Multiple response answer.

2Prior to receiving the first dose of Covishield vaccination.

3Pre-vaccination anxiety level.

4Pre-vaccination reactions to drugs or other vaccines.

5Post-vaccination events.

Table 3

Incidence of AEFI among participants following 1st dose of Covishield vaccine (n = 1006).

Characteristics	Participants	Percentages (%)
Adverse Events
Presence	799	79.4
Absence	207	20.6
Total	1006	100
Types of adverse events
Local	198	19.7
Systemic	115	11.4
Both local and systemic	486	48.3
Local reactions 1
Injection site tenderness	607	60.3
Injection site pain	427	42.4
Injection site swelling	23	2.3
Injection site redness	6	0.60
Systemic reactions 2
Fever	384	38.2
Body ache/Myalgia	324	32.2
Headache	290	28.9
Chills	222	22.1
Fatigue	176	17.5
Dizziness	121	12.0
Drowsiness	110	11.0
Nausea and/or vomiting	45	4.5
Irritable Mood	33	3.2
Anxiety	11	0.9
Fainting attack	5	0.5
Diarrhoea	7	0.7
Rashes	2	0.2
Shortness of breath	1	0.1
No. of Reactions 3
0	207	20.6
1	153	15.2
2	164	16.3
3	117	11.6
4	130	12.9
5	93	9.2
>5	142	14.1

1Participants had one or a combination of local reactions (Multiple responses).

2Participants had one or a combination of systemic reactions (Multiple responses).

3Include either local or systemic reactions.

Table 4

Association of various demographic and clinical parameters with AEFI (n = 1006).

Parameters	Adverse Events []		OR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI
	No (%)	Yes (%)
Age (years)
<30	79(38.2)	341(42.7)	1		1
30–44	67(31.4)	305(38.2)	1.1	0.7–1.5	1.1	0.8–1.6
45–59	55(26.6)	138(17.3)	0.6	0.4–0.9	0.5	0.3–0.8
≥60	6(2.9)	15(1.9)	0.6	0.2–1.5	0.6	0.2–1.5
Gender
Male	112(26.5)	311(73.5)	1		1
Female	95(16.3)	488(83.7)	1.9	1.4–2.5	1.7	1.2–2.4
Comorbidity
Absent	184(20.2)	726(79.8)	1
Present	23(24.0)	73(76.0)	0.8	0.5–1.3
COVID RT-PCR1 Status1
Negative	88(25.1)	262(74.9)	1		1
Positive	15(28.3)	38(71.7)	0.9	0.4–1.6	0.9	0.4–1.7
Not tested	104(17.2)	499(82.8)	1.6	1.2–2.1	1.5	1.1–2.1
Preanxiet y 2
No	109(25.2)	323(74.8)	1		1
Yes	98(17.1)	476(82.9)	1.6	1.2–2.2	1.6	1.2–2.2
Allergy 3
No	194 (21)	732 (79)	1		1
Yes	0 (0)	19 (100)	-		-
No Recall remember	13 (21.3)	48 (78.7)	0.9	0.5–1.8	0.9	0.5–1.9

1Pre vaccination COVID-19 RT-PCR Status [Neg. = Negative and Posi. = Positive].

2Prevaccination anxiety status.

3Pre-vaccination reactions to drugs or other vaccines.

*Adjusted for age, gender, COVID RT-PCR Status, pre-anxiety status and allergy status.