Literature DB >> 34931855

Local Extent of Prostate Cancer at MRI versus Prostatectomy Histopathology: Associations with Long-term Oncologic Outcomes.

Andreas G Wibmer1, Ines Nikolovski1, Joshua Chaim1, Yulia Lakhman1, Robert A Lefkowitz1, Evis Sala1, Sigrid V Carlsson1, Samson W Fine1, Michael W Kattan1, Hedvig Hricak1, Hebert Alberto Vargas1.   

Abstract

Background It is unknown how the imperfect accuracy of MRI for local staging of prostate cancer relates to oncologic outcomes. Purpose To analyze how staging discordances between MRI and histopathologic evaluation relate to recurrence and survival after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective analysis of preprostatectomy T2-weighted prostate MRI (January 2001 to December 2006). Extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion were assessed by using five-point Likert scales; scores of 4 or higher were classified as positive. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, and prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Results A total of 2160 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 55-64 years) were evaluated. Among patients with histopathologic extraprostatic (pT3) disease (683 of 2160; 32%), those with organ-confined disease at MRI (384 of 683; 56%) experienced better outcomes than those with concordant extraprostatic disease at MRI and pathologic analysis: 15-year risk for BCR, 30% (95% CI: 22, 40) versus 68% (95% CI: 60, 75); risk for metastases, 14% (95% CI: 8.4, 24) versus 32% (95% CI: 26, 39); risk for prostate cancer-specific mortality, 3% (95% CI: 1, 6) versus 15% (95% CI: 9.5, 23) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Among patients with histopathologic organ-confined disease (pT2) (1477 of 2160; 68%), those with extraprostatic disease at MRI (102 of 1477; 7%) were at higher risk for BCR (27% [95% CI: 19, 37] vs 10% [95% CI: 8, 14]; P < .001), metastases (19% [95% CI: 6, 48] vs 3% [95% CI: 1, 6]; P < .001), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (2% [95% CI: 1, 9] vs 1% [95% CI: 0, 5]; P = .009) than those with concordant organ-confined disease at MRI and pathologic analysis. At multivariable analyses, tumor extent at MRI (hazard ratio range, 4.1-5.2) and histopathologic evaluation (hazard ratio range, 3.6-6.7) was associated with the risk for BCR, metastases, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (P < .001 for all analyses). Conclusion The local extent of prostate cancer at MRI is associated with oncologic outcomes after prostatectomy, independent of pathologic tumor stage. This might inform a strategy on how to integrate MRI into a clinical staging algorithm. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Gottlieb in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34931855      PMCID: PMC8893181          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer: prognostic significance and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  S R Potter; J I Epstein; A W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

2.  Importance and outcome relevance of central pathology review in prostatectomy specimens: data from the SAKK 09/10 randomized trial on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Stefanie Hayoz; Vera Genitsch; Daniel R Zwahlen; Tobias Hölscher; Philipp Gut; Matthias Guckenberger; Guido Hildebrandt; Arndt-Christian Müller; Paul M Putora; Alexandros Papachristofilou; Lukas Stalder; Christine Biaggi-Rudolf; Marcin Sumila; Helmut Kranzbühler; Yousef Najafi; Piet Ost; Ngwa C Azinwi; Christiane Reuter; Stephan Bodis; Kaouthar Khanfir; Volker Budach; Daniel M Aebersold; George N Thalmann
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evan Kovac; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Zohar A Dotan; Christopher J DiBlasio; Alwyn Reuther; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging localizes established extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tom S Feng; Ali Reza Sharif-Afshar; Steven C Smith; Joseph Miller; Christopher Nguyen; Quanlin Li; Daniel Luthringer; Debiao Li; Rola Saouaf; Hyung L Kim
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Christopher R Porter; Alwyn M Reuther; Jochen Walz; Koichi Kodama; Robert P Gibbons; Roy Correa; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Eric A Klein; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Local staging of prostate cancer with multiparametric-MRI: accuracy and inter-reader agreement.

Authors:  Cristian Popiţa; Anca-Raluca Popiţa; Adina Andrei; Adriana Rusu; Bogdan Petruţ; Gabriel Kacso; Cătălina Bungărdean; Nicolae Bolog; Ioan Coman
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-04-22

10.  Oncologic Outcomes after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment: Associations with Pretreatment Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Andreas G Wibmer; Joshua Chaim; Yulia Lakhman; Robert A Lefkowitz; Josip Nincevic; Ines Nikolovski; Evis Sala; Mithat Gonen; Sigrid V Carlsson; Samson W Fine; Michael J Zelefsky; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging.

Authors:  Melissa M Chen; Admir Terzic; Anton S Becker; Jason M Johnson; Carol C Wu; Max Wintermark; Christoph Wald; Jia Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.