Literature DB >> 34931833

Predicting Protein-Peptide Complex Structures by Accounting for Peptide Flexibility and the Physicochemical Environment.

Xianjin Xu1, Xiaoqin Zou1.   

Abstract

Predicting protein-peptide complex structures is crucial to the understanding of a vast variety of peptide-mediated cellular processes and to peptide-based drug development. Peptide flexibility and binding mode ranking are the two major challenges for protein-peptide complex structure prediction. Peptides are highly flexible molecules, and therefore, brute-force modeling of peptide conformations of interest in protein-peptide docking is beyond current computing power. Inspired by the fact that the protein-peptide binding process is like protein folding, we developed a novel strategy, named MDockPeP2, which tries to address these challenges using physicochemical information embedded in abundant monomeric proteins with an exhaustive search strategy, in combination with an integrated global search and a local flexible minimization method. Only the peptide sequence and the protein crystal structure are required. The method was systemically assessed using a newly constructed structural database of 89 nonredundant protein-peptide complexes with the peptide sequence length ranging from 5 to 29 in which about half of the peptides are longer than 15 residues. MDockPeP2 yielded a total success rate of 58.4% (70.8, 79.8%) for the bound docking (i.e., with the bound receptor and fully flexible peptides) and 19.0% (44.8, 70.7%) for the challenging unbound docking when top 10 (100, 1000) models were considered for each prediction. MDockPeP2 achieved significantly higher success rates on two other datasets, peptiDB and LEADS-PEP, which contain only short- and medium-size peptides (≤ 15 residues). For peptiDB, our method obtained a success rate of 62.0% for the bound docking and 35.9% for the unbound docking when the top 10 models were considered. For LEADS-PEP, MDockPeP2 achieved a success rate of 69.8% when the top 10 models were considered. The program is available at https://zougrouptoolkit.missouri.edu/mdockpep2/download.html.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34931833      PMCID: PMC9020583          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   6.162


  38 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications.

Authors:  Evangelia Petsalaki; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 4.  Peptide docking and structure-based characterization of peptide binding: from knowledge to know-how.

Authors:  Nir London; Barak Raveh; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Iris Antes
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-04

Review 6.  Interfering peptides targeting protein-protein interactions: the next generation of drugs?

Authors:  Heriberto Bruzzoni-Giovanelli; Valerie Alezra; Nicolas Wolff; Chang-Zhi Dong; Pierre Tuffery; Angelita Rebollo
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Fully Blind Docking at the Atomic Level for Protein-Peptide Complex Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Chengfei Yan; Xianjin Xu; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  PCalign: a method to quantify physicochemical similarity of protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Shanshan Cheng; Yang Zhang; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  ClusPro PeptiDock: efficient global docking of peptide recognition motifs using FFT.

Authors:  Kathryn A Porter; Bing Xia; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Nawsad Alam; Ora Schueler-Furman; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  Matching protein surface structural patches for high-resolution blind peptide docking.

Authors:  Alisa Khramushin; Ziv Ben-Aharon; Tomer Tsaban; Julia K Varga; Orly Avraham; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.