| Literature DB >> 34931418 |
Cheng Zeng1, Wenhao Zheng2, Hong Xu3, Silvio Osella4, Wei Ma5, Hai I Wang2, Zijie Qiu2, Ken-Ichi Otake6, Wencai Ren5, Huiming Cheng5, Klaus Müllen2, Mischa Bonn2, Cheng Gu1,7, Yuguang Ma1,7.
Abstract
Electrochemical deposition has emerged as an efficient technique for preparing conjugated polymer films on electrodes. However, this method encounters difficulties in synthesizing crystalline products and controlling their orientation on electrodes. Here we report electrochemical film deposition of a large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. The film is composed of single-crystalline nanorods, in which the molecules adopt a cofacial stacking arrangement along the π-π direction. Film thickness and crystal size can be controlled by electrochemical conditions such as scan rate and electrolyte species, while the choice of anode material determines crystal orientation. The film supports exceptionally efficient migration of both free carriers and excitons: the free carrier mobility reaches over 30 cm2 V-1 s-1 , whereas the excitons are delocalized with a low binding energy of 118.5 meV and a remarkable exciton diffusion length of 45 nm.Entities:
Keywords: carrier and exciton migration; electrochemical deposition; organic single crystal; orientation control; thin films
Year: 2022 PMID: 34931418 PMCID: PMC9306484 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202115389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1Fabrication of HBC‐6Ph single‐crystal films by electrochemical approach. Schematic diagram illustrating the molecular structure of HPB‐6Ph and HBC‐6Ph and the self‐assemble crystal orientation on ITO or MLG.
Figure 2Electrochemical synthesis and deposition of HPB‐6Ph. a) CV profiles (1st to 10th cycles) of an HPB‐6Ph solution in the presence of the Bu4NPF6 electrolyte at 25 °C with a scan rate of 0.05 V s−1. b) MALDI‐TOF‐MS of HPB‐6Ph and HBC‐6Ph. c) The plot of the mass density versus the CV cycle number for HBC‐6Ph. d) The plot of the film thickness versus the CV cycle number for HBC‐6Ph.
Figure 3Crystal structure of HBC‐6Ph nanorods and orientation control. a) SEM image of HBC‐6Ph films on ITO. b) TEM image of the HBC‐6Ph nanorods at high magnification. c) SADE pattern of the HBC‐6Ph nanorods. d) PXRD pattern: experimentally observed, the simulated rotated eclipsed stacking and the simulated complete eclipsed stacking. e) Top and side views of the HBC‐6Ph in the rotated staggered stacking mode. f) C−H⋅⋅⋅π interactions between neighboring peripheral phenyl groups. g) Cross‐section SEM image of HBC‐6Ph films on MLG. h) GIWAXS pattern of HBC‐6Ph films on ITO. i) GIWAXS pattern of HBC‐6Ph films on MLG.
Figure 4Electronic properties of HBC‐6Ph films. a) Time‐resolved photoinduced real and imaginary conductivities of HBC‐6Ph films measured as the relative change in terahertz transmission at the peak of the terahertz pulse (real, black line) and the zero‐crossing point of the terahertz pulse (imaginary, red line). b) Frequency‐resolved terahertz conductivity of HBC‐6Ph films measured at the peak of the photoconductivity and a Drude–Smith fit. c) Temperature‐dependent integrated PL intensity of HBC‐6Ph films on ITO and fits. d) Integrated PL intensity versus exciton generation rate for HBC‐6Ph films on ITO.