Literature DB >> 34931323

Genetic control of the pluripotency epigenome determines differentiation bias in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Candice Byers1,2, Catrina Spruce1, Haley J Fortin1,2, Ellen I Hartig1,2, Anne Czechanski1, Steven C Munger1,2, Laura G Reinholdt1, Daniel A Skelly1, Christopher L Baker1,2.   

Abstract

Genetically diverse pluripotent stem cells display varied, heritable responses to differentiation cues. Here, we harnessed these disparities through derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells from the BXD genetic reference panel, along with C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) parental strains, to identify loci regulating cell state transitions. Upon transition to formative pluripotency, B6 stem cells quickly dissolved naïve networks adopting gene expression modules indicative of neuroectoderm lineages, whereas D2 retained aspects of naïve pluripotency. Spontaneous formation of embryoid bodies identified divergent differentiation where B6 showed a propensity toward neuroectoderm and D2 toward definitive endoderm. Genetic mapping identified major trans-acting loci co-regulating chromatin accessibility and gene expression in both naïve and formative pluripotency. These loci distally modulated occupancy of pluripotency factors at hundreds of regulatory elements. One trans-acting locus on Chr 12 primarily impacted chromatin accessibility in embryonic stem cells, while in epiblast-like cells, the same locus subsequently influenced expression of genes enriched for neurogenesis, suggesting early chromatin priming. These results demonstrate genetically determined biases in lineage commitment and identify major regulators of the pluripotency epigenome.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BXD mice; KRAB zinc-finger proteins; cell fate; epigenetic variability; mESCs

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34931323      PMCID: PMC8762565          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021109445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   14.012


  103 in total

Review 1.  Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Sebastian J Arnold; Elizabeth J Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains.

Authors:  Anne Czechanski; Candice Byers; Ian Greenstein; Nadine Schrode; Leah Rae Donahue; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Laura G Reinholdt
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Sox1 marks an activated neural stem/progenitor cell in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Monica Venere; Young-Goo Han; Robert Bell; Jun S Song; Arturo Alvarez-Buylla; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Daehwan Kim; Geo M Pertea; Jeffrey T Leek; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation.

Authors:  Taiping Chen; Sharon Y R Dent
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs.

Authors:  Helena Kilpinen; Angela Goncalves; Andreas Leha; Vackar Afzal; Kaur Alasoo; Sofie Ashford; Sendu Bala; Dalila Bensaddek; Francesco Paolo Casale; Oliver J Culley; Petr Danecek; Adam Faulconbridge; Peter W Harrison; Annie Kathuria; Davis McCarthy; Shane A McCarthy; Ruta Meleckyte; Yasin Memari; Nathalie Moens; Filipa Soares; Alice Mann; Ian Streeter; Chukwuma A Agu; Alex Alderton; Rachel Nelson; Sarah Harper; Minal Patel; Alistair White; Sharad R Patel; Laura Clarke; Reena Halai; Christopher M Kirton; Anja Kolb-Kokocinski; Philip Beales; Ewan Birney; Davide Danovi; Angus I Lamond; Willem H Ouwehand; Ludovic Vallier; Fiona M Watt; Richard Durbin; Oliver Stegle; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics.

Authors:  Kelly Street; Davide Risso; Russell B Fletcher; Diya Das; John Ngai; Nir Yosef; Elizabeth Purdom; Sandrine Dudoit
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Permissiveness to form pluripotent stem cells may be an evolutionarily derived characteristic in Mus musculus.

Authors:  Tiffany A Garbutt; Thomas I Konneker; Kranti Konganti; Andrew E Hillhouse; Francis Swift-Haire; Alexis Jones; Drake Phelps; David L Aylor; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Capture of Mouse and Human Stem Cells with Features of Formative Pluripotency.

Authors:  Masaki Kinoshita; Michael Barber; William Mansfield; Yingzhi Cui; Daniel Spindlow; Giuliano Giuseppe Stirparo; Sabine Dietmann; Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 25.269

10.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.

Authors:  I Gabrielle M Brons; Lucy E Smithers; Matthew W B Trotter; Peter Rugg-Gunn; Bowen Sun; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Sarah K Howlett; Amanda Clarkson; Lars Ahrlund-Richter; Roger A Pedersen; Ludovic Vallier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Generation of hiPSC-Derived Skeletal Muscle Cells: Exploiting the Potential of Skeletal Muscle-Derived hiPSCs.

Authors:  Eric Metzler; Helena Escobar; Daniele Yumi Sunaga-Franze; Sascha Sauer; Sebastian Diecke; Simone Spuler
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Heparinized Gelatin-Based Hydrogels for Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Matthew R Arkenberg; Karl Koehler; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.978

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.