Literature DB >> 34931298

Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review.

Rozaleen Dash1, Sumit Kumar Singh1,2, Narendra Chirmule3, Anurag S Rathore4.   

Abstract

The development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) biosimilars is a complex process. The key to their successful development and commercialization is an in-depth understanding of the key product attributes that impact safety and efficacy and the strategies to control them. Functional assessment of mAb is a crucial part of the comparability of biopharmaceutical drugs. The development of a relevant and robust functional assay requires an interdisciplinary approach and sufficient flexibility to balance regulatory concerns as well as dynamics and variability during the manufacturing process. Although many advanced tools are available to study and compare the potency and bioactivity of the protein, most of these techniques suffer from major shortcomings that limit their routine use. These include the complexity of the task, establishment of the relevance of the chosen method with the mechanism of action (MOA) of the biosimilar, cost and extended time of analysis, and often the ambiguity in interpretation of the resulting data. To overcome or to address these challenges, the use of multiple orthogonal state-of-the-art techniques is a necessary prerequisite.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-based assay; critical quality attributes (CQAs); functional comparability; ligand binding assay; mechanism of action (MOA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34931298     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00671-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  88 in total

Review 1.  Antibodies to watch in 2021.

Authors:  Hélène Kaplon; Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Aggregation mechanism of an IgG2 and two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies at low pH: from oligomers to larger aggregates.

Authors:  Paolo Arosio; Simonetta Rima; Massimo Morbidelli
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  The Increasingly Human and Profitable Monoclonal Antibody Market.

Authors:  António L Grilo; A Mantalaris
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  The End of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Biosimilars Development?

Authors:  Francois-Xavier Frapaise
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  Biosimilars in Developed Economies: Overview, Status, and Regulatory Considerations.

Authors:  Anurag S Rathore; Ankita Bhargava
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 6.  Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars.

Authors:  Steven A Berkowitz; John R Engen; Jeffrey R Mazzeo; Graham B Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Biological activity of human-mouse IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 chimeric monoclonal antibodies with antitumor specificity.

Authors:  Z Steplewski; L K Sun; C W Shearman; J Ghrayeb; P Daddona; H Koprowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biosimilars advancements: Moving on to the future.

Authors:  Lilian Rumi Tsuruta; Mariana Lopes dos Santos; Ana Maria Moro
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 9.  Antibodies to watch in 2020.

Authors:  Hélène Kaplon; Mrinalini Muralidharan; Zita Schneider; Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

10.  An overview of patents on therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in Europe: are they a hurdle to biosimilar market entry?

Authors:  Evelien Moorkens; Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.