| Literature DB >> 34930966 |
Jiahao Qu1, Brian Sumali1, Ho Lee2, Hideki Terai2, Makoto Ishii2, Koichi Fukunaga2, Yasue Mitsukura3, Toshihiko Nishimura4.
Abstract
Since 2019, a large number of people worldwide have been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Among those infected, a limited number develop severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which generally has an acute onset. The treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 is challenging. To optimize disease prognosis and effectively utilize medical resources, proactive measures must be adopted for patients at risk of developing severe COVID-19. We analyzed the data of COVID-19 patients from seven medical institutions in Tokyo and used mathematical modeling of patient blood test results to quantify and compare the predictive ability of multiple prognostic indicators for the development of severe COVID-19. A machine learning logistic regression model was used to analyze the blood test results of 300 patients. Due to the limited data set, the size of the training group was constantly adjusted to ensure that the results of machine learning were effective (e.g., recognition rate of disease severity > 80%). Lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and ferritin levels were the best prognostic indicators of severe COVID-19. The mathematical model developed in this study enables prediction and classification of COVID-19 severity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34930966 PMCID: PMC8688457 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03632-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical symptoms and signs according to disease severity (N = 312).
| Symptom or sign | Disease severity | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-severe (%) (N = 208) | Severe (%) (N = 104) | |
| Altered level of consciousness | 1 | 11 |
| Fever (≥ 37.5 °C) | 65 | 89 |
| Cough | 44 | 52 |
| Sputum | 16 | 24 |
| Sore throat | 19 | 13 |
| Nasal discharge | 14 | 1 |
| Dysgeusia | 22 | 13 |
| Dysosmia | 18 | 9 |
| Shortness of breath | 14 | 50 |
| Diarrhea | 10 | 16 |
| Nausea and vomiting | 2 | 9 |
| Malaise | 27 | 52 |
| Bacterial infection | 2 | 27 |
| Fungal infection | 0 | 5 |
| Heart failure | 0 | 13 |
| Thromboembolism (including pulmonary embolism and cerebral infarction) | 0 | 10 |
| Liver dysfunction | 4 | 39 |
| Renal dysfunction | 0 | 17 |
| Macrophage activation syndrome (including hemophagocytic syndrome) | 0 | 2 |
Figure 1Association between the degree of influence of each factor according to the size of the training group. Cre, Creatine; CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
Figure 2The coefficient of variation of each predictor in different training groups.
Accuracy of the three evaluation models and comparison of the influence of each factor in each regression model from greatest to least.
| Regression type | Training group recognition rate | Test group recognition rate | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lasso | 0.63 | 0.31 | Cre | LDH | CRP | Hb |
| Ridge | 0.64 | 0.3 | Cre | Ferritin | CRP | LDH |
| Logistic | 0.98 | 0.88 | Cre | LDH | Ferritin | CRP |
Cre, creatine; CRP, C-reactive protein; Hb, hemoglobin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.