Hikaru Fukutomi1, Lydia Hamitouche2, Takayuki Yamamoto1, Laurent Denat1, Lijun Zhang3, Bei Zhang4, Valentin Prevost5, Bruno Triaire5, Vincent Dousset1,2,6, Xavier Barreau2, Thomas Tourdias7,8,9. 1. Univ. Bordeaux, Institut de Bio-imagerie IBIO, 33000, Bordeaux, France. 2. CHU de Bordeaux, Neuroimagerie Diagnostique Et Thérapeutique, 33000, Bordeaux, France. 3. Canon Medical Systems China, Beijing, China. 4. Canon Medical Systems Europe, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands. 5. Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Tochigi, Japan. 6. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, 146 rue Léo saignat, U1215F-3300, Bordeaux Cedex, France. 7. Univ. Bordeaux, Institut de Bio-imagerie IBIO, 33000, Bordeaux, France. thomas.tourdias@chu-bordeaux.fr. 8. CHU de Bordeaux, Neuroimagerie Diagnostique Et Thérapeutique, 33000, Bordeaux, France. thomas.tourdias@chu-bordeaux.fr. 9. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, 146 rue Léo saignat, U1215F-3300, Bordeaux Cedex, France. thomas.tourdias@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 3D-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) collected 4 h after intravenous gadolinium injection can delineate the perilymphatic space (PLS) from the endolymphatic space (ELS) to capture endolymphatic hydrops, the pathological counterpart of Ménière's disease. We aimed to optimize visualization of such inner ear internal anatomy using 3D-FLAIR without injection. METHODS: 3D-FLAIR signal from different fluid compartments such as PLS and ELS was first simulated. Then, twenty-two healthy subjects were scanned at 3.0-T MRI with non-injected 3D-FLAIR using variable T2 preparations (T2Preps) (OFF, 200, 400, and 600 ms) and variable inversion times (TIs) (from 224 to 5000 ms) and different resolutions (1.0 × 1.0 × 1.5, 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.8, and 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm3). The relative contrast between PLS and ELS and the visibility of the saccule and utricle were assessed. Additionally, non-injected 3D-FLAIR with the optimal setting was tested in a Ménière patient and compared with gadolinium-injected 3D-FLAIR. RESULTS: The PLS and ELS were differentiated when T2Prep was used but not without. The relative contrast was larger with T2Prep at 400 ms than at 200 or 600 ms (0.72 ± 0.22 vs. 0.44 ± 0.11, p = 0.019; and 0.72 ± 0.22 vs. 0.46 ± 0.28, p = 0.034, respectively). The saccule and utricle were best delineated in 87. % cases with T2Prep = 400 and TI = 2100 ms at the highest resolution. Visualization of the saccule and utricle in the optimized non-injected 3D-FLAIR was similar to conventional injected 3D-FLAIR in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Combining a specific T2Prep and TI in non-injected 3D-FLAIR could separate PLS and ELS and even the saccule and utricle, paving the way toward future application to diagnose Ménière's disease. KEY POINTS: • MRI can capture the internal anatomy of inner ear without injection of contrast media. • Specific parameters consisting of a T2 preparation of 400 ms and an inversion time of 2100 ms must be used to visualize the saccule and utricle on non-injected 3D-FLAIR.
OBJECTIVES: 3D-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) collected 4 h after intravenous gadolinium injection can delineate the perilymphatic space (PLS) from the endolymphatic space (ELS) to capture endolymphatic hydrops, the pathological counterpart of Ménière's disease. We aimed to optimize visualization of such inner ear internal anatomy using 3D-FLAIR without injection. METHODS: 3D-FLAIR signal from different fluid compartments such as PLS and ELS was first simulated. Then, twenty-two healthy subjects were scanned at 3.0-T MRI with non-injected 3D-FLAIR using variable T2 preparations (T2Preps) (OFF, 200, 400, and 600 ms) and variable inversion times (TIs) (from 224 to 5000 ms) and different resolutions (1.0 × 1.0 × 1.5, 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.8, and 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm3). The relative contrast between PLS and ELS and the visibility of the saccule and utricle were assessed. Additionally, non-injected 3D-FLAIR with the optimal setting was tested in a Ménière patient and compared with gadolinium-injected 3D-FLAIR. RESULTS: The PLS and ELS were differentiated when T2Prep was used but not without. The relative contrast was larger with T2Prep at 400 ms than at 200 or 600 ms (0.72 ± 0.22 vs. 0.44 ± 0.11, p = 0.019; and 0.72 ± 0.22 vs. 0.46 ± 0.28, p = 0.034, respectively). The saccule and utricle were best delineated in 87. % cases with T2Prep = 400 and TI = 2100 ms at the highest resolution. Visualization of the saccule and utricle in the optimized non-injected 3D-FLAIR was similar to conventional injected 3D-FLAIR in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Combining a specific T2Prep and TI in non-injected 3D-FLAIR could separate PLS and ELS and even the saccule and utricle, paving the way toward future application to diagnose Ménière's disease. KEY POINTS: • MRI can capture the internal anatomy of inner ear without injection of contrast media. • Specific parameters consisting of a T2 preparation of 400 ms and an inversion time of 2100 ms must be used to visualize the saccule and utricle on non-injected 3D-FLAIR.
Authors: Jeremy Hornibrook; Edward Flook; Sam Greig; Melissa Babbage; Tony Goh; Mark Coates; Rachel Care; Philip Bird Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.311