| Literature DB >> 34926267 |
Haiying Fu1, Huarong Zhou2, Yanyan Qiu2, Jianfei Wang3, Zhiming Ma3, Hongping Li3, Feng Zhang2, Chenxi Qiu1, Jianzhen Shen2, Tingbo Liu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mounting studies have sought to identify novel mutation biomarkers having diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Nevertheless, the understanding of the mutated pathways related to development and prognosis of B-cell lymphoma is still lacking. We aimed to comprehensively analyze the mutation alterations in genes of canonical signaling pathways and their impacts on the clinic outcomes of patients with B-cell lymphoma.Entities:
Keywords: B-cell lymphoma; Hippo pathway; TP53 signaling pathway; gene fusion; mutated pathway; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34926267 PMCID: PMC8671703 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.765544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Patient demographic and clinical characteristics (N=79).
| Variables | N (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Male | 41 (51.9%) |
| Female | 38 (48.1%) |
|
| 56 (47-65) |
|
| |
| 18.5~23.9 | 45 (57.0%) |
| <18.5 | 8 (10.1%) |
| ≥24 | 24 (30.4%) |
| Unknown | 2 (2.5%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 18 (22.8%) |
| No | 56 (70.9%) |
| Unknown | 5 (6.3%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 26 (32.9%) |
| No | 52 (65.8%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.3%) |
|
| |
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | 55 (69.6%) |
| Follicular lymphoma | 6 (7.6%) |
| Marginal zone lymphoma | 4 (5.1%) |
| High-grade B-cell lymphoma | 2 (2.5%) |
| Other* | 9 (11.4%) |
| Unknown | 3 (3.8%) |
|
| |
| I | 5 (6.3%) |
| II | 14 (17.7%) |
| III | 10 (12.7%) |
| IV | 43 (54.4%) |
| Unknown | 7 (8.9%) |
|
| |
| R-CHOP | 27 (34.2%) |
| CHOP | 3 (3.8%) |
| R-miniCHOP | 4 (5.1%) |
| R-COEP | 22 (27.8%) |
| R-DA-EPOCH | 3 (3.8%) |
| Other# | 20 (25.3%) |
|
| |
| 0–1 | 27 (34.2%) |
| 2 | 19 (24.1%) |
| 3 | 15 (19.0%) |
| 11 (13.9%) | |
| Unknown | 7 (8.9%) |
|
| |
| Complete response | 26 (32.9%) |
| Partial response | 19 (24.1%) |
| Stable disease | 2 (2.5%) |
| Progressive disease | 5 (6.3%) |
| Unknown | 27 (34.2%) |
BMI, body mass index; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R-miniCHOP, rituximab with low-does CHOP chemotherapy regimen; R-COEP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone; R-DA-EPOCH, rituximab with dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin.
*Other includes subtypes of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), B lymphoblastic lymphoma, large B cell lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, and primary central nervous system large B-cell lymphoma.
#Other includes regimens of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CEOP), rituximab combined with lenalidomide (R2)-CEOP (R2-CEOP), R2-gemox, rituximab combined with methotrexate, cytarabine and dexamethasone (R-MAD), hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper-CVAD), rituximab plus methotrexate (R-MTX), R2-CHOP and R2-COEP.
Figure 1Mutation plot showing top 30 frequently mutated genes in 79 B-cell lymphoma patients. Color-coded is indicated by type of mutation. Y axis shows the percentages of patients with at least one mutation in the specified gene.
Fusion genes identified from79 B-cell lymphomas.
| Fusion genes | Types | Detected patients |
|---|---|---|
| FAM65B_NTRK3 | Intron of FAM65B(−):46Kb after exon 1|Intron of NTRK3(−):20Kb before exon 13 | Pt58 |
| Intron of FAM65B(−):1Kb after exon 22|Intron of NTRK3(−):7Kb after exon 13 | Pt37 | |
| NPM1_NR4A3 | NPM1:exon3-NR4A3:intron7 | Pt9, Pt10, Pt17 |
| RANBP2_MCPH1 | RANBP2:exon21-MCPH1:intron12 | Pt4, Pt5, Pt6, Pt7, Pt9, Pt11, Pt14, Pt17, Pt18 |
| SEPT6_TRIM33 | SEPT6:intron2-TRIM33:intron1 | Pt2, Pt5, Pt7, Pt16 |
| TCF7L2_WT1 | Intron of TCF7L2(+):24Kb before exon 5|Intron of WT1(−):39bp after exon 1 | Pt38, Pt39, Pt69 |
| Intron of TCF7L2(+):24Kb before exon 5|Intron of WT1(−):74bp after exon 1 | Pt1, Pt20, Pt22, Pt23, Pt29, Pt31, Pt48, Pt51, Pt54, Pt56, Pt57, Pt60, Pt67, Pt71, Pt72 | |
| Intron of TCF7L2(+):24Kb before exon 6|Intron of WT1(−):2Kb before exon 2 | Pt76 | |
| TCF7L2:intron5-WT1:intron1 | Pt2, Pt5, Pt7, Pt13 |
Figure 2Functional enrichment result reveals the top 10 function terms for GO and KEGG analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) comprises three categories: molecular function (MF), biological process (BP), and cellular component (CC). X axis represents the count of genes enriched in corresponding terms. Color depth of columns is positively related with the P value of term. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Figure 3Mutation plot of seven canonical oncogenic signaling pathways (cell cycle, Hippo, Notch, PI3-Kinase, RTK-RAS, p53, and Wnt pathways) in 79 B-cell lymphoma patients. Color-coded is indicated by type of mutation. Y axis shows the percentages of patients with at least one mutation in the specified gene.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS differences between subgroups with and without SEPT6_TRIM33 gene fusion (A), any of five fusion genes detected in at least of two cases (B), TP53 gene mutation (C), mutated TP53 pathway (D), mutated Hippo pathway (E). PFS, progression-free survival. P values were calculated by the log-rank test.
Figure 5Prognostic significances of fusion gene, mutated pathways, and clinic factors by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Figure 6The alterations of mean VAFs of mutated genes in Tp53 (A) and hippo pathways (B) in paired baseline and post-treatment samples from 18 B-cell lymphoma patients. VAF, variant allele frequency.
Relationship between genomic alterations and clinical response to treatment.
| Genomic alterations | Group (n) | CR+PR | PD+SD | ORR (%) | P.value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPM1_NR4A3 | Mut (3) | 1 | 2 | 33.33% | 0.01 |
| Wild (50) | 44 | 6 | 88.00% | ||
| FAM65B_NTRK3 | Mut (1) | 0 | 1 | 0.00% | 0.02 |
| Wild (52) | 45 | 7 | 86.54% | ||
| SEPT6_TRIM33 | Mut (3) | 1 | 2 | 33.33% | 0.01 |
| Wild (50) | 44 | 6 | 88.00% | ||
| RANBP2_MCPH1 | Mut (9) | 7 | 2 | 77.78% | 0.51 |
| Wild (44) | 38 | 6 | 86.36% | ||
| TCF7L2_WT1 | Mut (14) | 11 | 3 | 78.57% | 0.44 |
| Wild (39) | 34 | 5 | 87.18% | ||
| TP53 | Mut (10) | 7 | 3 | 70.00% | 0.14 |
| Wild (43) | 38 | 5 | 88.37% | ||
| TP53_TSG | Mut (13) | 9 | 4 | 69.23% | 0.07 |
| Wild (40) | 36 | 4 | 90.00% | ||
| Hippo_TSG | Mut (5) | 3 | 2 | 60.00% | 0.32 |
| Wild (48) | 42 | 6 | 87.50% |
CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; ORR, objective response rate.