| Literature DB >> 34925806 |
Francisco Rodríguez-González1, José Pérez-González2, Cesar Nadem Muñoz-López1, Silvia Viridiana Vargas-Solano1, Benjamín M Marín-Santibáñez3.
Abstract
Nopal mucilages are of interest due to a variety of potential applications, which include their use as thickeners and rheological modifiers. In this work, changes in molecular characteristics of nopal mucilages with their age and its influence on the rheological behavior of their solutions were analyzed by light scattering, high performance liquid chromatography, a colorimetric method, and linear viscoelastic rheometrical measurements. For this, mucilages obtained from cladodes from Opuntia ficus-indica with different ages, namely 20, 80, and 600 days, respectively, were extracted using water as solvent and then subjected to freeze-drying. The weight-average molecular weight (M w) of the mucilages was found to increase along with the age; meanwhile, the concentration of uronic acids increased and the galactose, rhamnose, and xylose contents decreased. Increasing M w with age resulted in enhanced viscoelastic behavior of solutions, namely, higher viscosity and elasticity at lower mucilage concentrations. Also, along with increasing M w, decrease in neutral sugar contents and increase of pectic compounds (uronic acids) and Ca+ cations in mucilages with age promoted formation of weak gels. Overall, the molecular weights and rheological behaviors reported in this work for nopal mucilages are comparable to those of widely used thickeners such as xanthan and guar gums, which suggest their use in similar applications regarding its age.Entities:
Keywords: Opuntia ficus‐indica (nopal); age; molecular weight; mucilages; rheological behavior
Year: 2021 PMID: 34925806 PMCID: PMC8645762 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Concentrations of diluted mucilage solutions for M w determination using SLS and rheological measurements with different ages
| Concentration of the mucilage solutions for | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 0.00316 | 0.00309 | 0.00114 |
| 0.00474 | 0.00464 | 0.00273 |
| 0.00632 | 0.00619 | 0.0041 |
| 0.00948 | 0.00928 | 0.00546 |
Concentration of sugars in Opuntia ficus‐indica with different ages
| Sugar |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Arabinose | – | 0.054 ± 0.001b | 0.043 ± 0.001a |
| Fructose | 0.13 ± 0.02a | 0.38 ± 0.04b | 0.30 ± 0.03b |
| Galactose | 8.52 ± 0.12c | 5.88 ± 1b | 1.48 ± 0.13a |
| Glucose | 3.26 ± 0.1a | 16.54 ± 0.29c | 9.77 ± 0.50b |
| Rhamnose | 8.05 ± 0.44c | 1.57 ± 0.17b | 0.38 ± 0.09a |
| Xylose | 19.22 ± 0.16c | 13.37 ± 0.65b | 1.24 ± 0.17a |
| Uronic acid | 9.59 ± 0.48a | 10.68 ± 0.61a | 30.31 ± 4.27b |
Values represent average ± standard deviation in g/100 g of mucilage (n = 3). Results in rows labeled with different letters indicate significant differences for Tukey (p ˂ .05).
Refraction indexes, n, and Kc/R values as a function of concentration, c, for nopal mucilage solutions with different ages
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 0.00316 | 1.33299 | 5.781 × 10–7 |
| 0.00474 | 1.33324 | 6.59 × 10–7 |
| 0.00632 | 1.33346 | 7.171 × 10–7 |
| 0.00948 | 1.33392 | 10.35 × 10–7 |
|
| ||
| 0.00309 | 1.33298 | 3.79 × 10–7 |
| 0.00464 | 1.33318 | 4.29 × 10–7 |
| 0.00619 | 1.3334 | 5.02 × 10–7 |
| 0.00928 | 1.3339 | 7.17 × 10–7 |
|
| ||
| 0.00114 | 1.33274 | 1.164 × 10–7 |
| 0.00273 | 1.3329 | 1.781 × 10–7 |
| 0.0041 | 1.33309 | 1.813 × 10–7 |
| 0.00546 | 1.33323 | 2.558 × 10–7 |
FIGURE 1Refractive indexes of T, Y and M nopal mucilage solutions as functions of concentration. Continuous lines indicate the linear fittings
FIGURE 2Kc/Rθ values as a function of concentration for T, Y and mature M nopal mucilage solutions. Continuous lines indicate the fitting to Equation 1
Molecular weight, M w, of nopal mucilages with different ages, second virial coefficient, A 2, and concentration regimes, c*, of their solutions
| Mucilage |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.258 | 0.229 | 20.13 |
|
| 3.963 | 0.199 | 12.68 |
|
| 11.869 | 0.147 | 5.74 |
FIGURE 3Linear viscoelastic behavior of T nopal mucilage solutions. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three different measurements for each sample
FIGURE 4Linear viscoelastic behavior of Y nopal mucilage solutions. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three different measurements for each sample
FIGURE 5Linear viscoelastic behavior of M nopal mucilage solutions. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three different measurements for each sample
FIGURE 6Picture of the solution with 6 wt.% of M mucilage subjected to elongation and showing its state of high elasticity