Literature DB >> 34925774

Screening for learning disabilities in Oman: confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic version of the learning disabilities diagnostic inventory.

Mahmoud Mohamed Emam1, Rashid Almehrizi1, Ehab Omara1, Ali Mahdi Kazem1.   

Abstract

Students at risk for learning disabilities (LD) are overidentified in elementary schools in Oman due to the absence of adequate instruments which teachers can use in validating their observations. Teachers need valid instruments so that their judgment of students' behaviours can help in making academic and non-academic decision. The Learning Disabilities Diagnostic Inventory (LDDI) is widely used to examine manifestations of LD as an intrinsic processing disorder. This study aimed to verify the six-factor structure with confirmatory factor analysis, and test its measurement invariance across child gender. Teachers completed the Arabic version of the LDDI for an Omani sample of 1564 children aged 7 to 11. Overall, the six-factor model showed an acceptable fit after performing some post-hoc modifications that were justified on a theoretical ground. Results indicated metric invariance across gender. Zero-order correlations, however, were highly significant, which reflected that the Arabic version of the LDDI showed poor discriminant validity compared to the original LDDI. The Arabic version of the LDDI, however, can be a handy tool to screen for the LD manifestations and help in responding to teachers' academic concerns about students in Key stages 1 and 2 in Oman. © The British Society of Developmental Disabilities 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arab context; Oman; learning disabilities diagnostic inventory; screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 34925774      PMCID: PMC8676701          DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1683367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil        ISSN: 2047-3869


  14 in total

1.  Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability.

Authors:  E G Willcutt; B F Pennington
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 2.  Learning disabilities: definitions, epidemiology, diagnosis, and intervention strategies.

Authors:  Lieven Lagae
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 3.  Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.

Authors:  Dennis L Jackson; J Arthur Gillaspy; Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-03

4.  Predictive validity of curriculum-based measurement and teacher ratings of academic achievement.

Authors:  Ryan J Kettler; Craig A Albers
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2013-03-26

Review 5.  Identification of learning disabilities: implications of proposed DSM-5 criteria for school-based assessment.

Authors:  Wendy Cavendish
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-11-05

Review 6.  Dyscalculia: from brain to education.

Authors:  Brian Butterworth; Sashank Varma; Diana Laurillard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Specific learning disability and its newest definition: which is comprehensive? And which is insufficient?

Authors:  David Scanlon
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-11-09

Review 8.  Comorbidity of LD and ADHD: implications of DSM-5 for assessment and treatment.

Authors:  George J DuPaul; Matthew J Gormley; Seth D Laracy
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-11-09

9.  Individual prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficit models.

Authors:  Bruce F Pennington; Laura Santerre-Lemmon; Jennifer Rosenberg; Beatriz MacDonald; Richard Boada; Angela Friend; Daniel R Leopold; Stefan Samuelsson; Brian Byrne; Erik G Willcutt; Richard K Olson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-10-24

10.  The DSM and learning difficulties: formulating a genealogy of the learning-disabled subject.

Authors:  Ofer Katchergin
Journal:  Hist Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.