| Literature DB >> 34923983 |
Mashair Sir El Khatim Mustafa1, Zairi Jaal2, Sumia Abu Kashawa3, Siti Azizah Mohd Nor4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles arabiensis is a member of Anopheles gambiae complex and the main malaria vector in Sudan. There is insufficient population genetics data available on An. arabiensis for an understanding of vector population structure and genetics, which are important for the malaria vector control programmes in this country. The objective of this investigation is to study the population structure, gene flow and isolation by distance among An. arabiensis populations for developing control strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles arabiensis; Bottleneck; Gene flow; Microsatellite loci; Population genetic; Sudan
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34923983 PMCID: PMC8684682 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03994-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Study areas
Allelic richness (AR), number of alleles (NA), and the mean allele number of observed (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) at each locus per population
| Locus | Pop | Gw | H.sh | Hj | My | Se | Kr | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 33 | 34 | 32 | 34 | 33 | 34 | 200 | |
| AGXH678 | AR | 2 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| NA | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 | |
| AG2H290 | AR | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| NA | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| AG2H603 | AR | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| NA | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |
| AG2H143 | AR | 6 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 15 |
| NA | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 13 | |
| AG3H29 | AR | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| NA | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | 2 | |
| AG3H45 | AR | 10 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 13 |
| NA | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 13 | |
| AG3H158 | AR | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| NA | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |
| Mean | AR | 4.3 | 6 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 7.4 |
| NA | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 7.6 | |
| HO | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.61 | |
| HE | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.58 |
Fig. 2Number of alleles observed in each locus for each population
Population genetic diversity as measured by observed (H) and expected (H) heterozigosities and FIS
| Pop | Gw | H.sh | Hj | My | Se | Kr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | No | 33 | 34 | 32 | 34 | 33 | 34 |
| AGXH678 | HO | 0.49 | 0.85 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.64 |
| HE | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.53 | |
| FIS | 0.09 | − 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.04 | − 0.20 | |
| P | 0.03* | 0.00* | 0.71 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |
| AG2H290 | HO | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| HE | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.65 | |
| FIS | − 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.01 | − 0.03 | |
| P | 0.27 | 0.00* | 0.03* | 0.00* | 0.10 | 0.00* | |
| AG2H603 | HO | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| HE | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | |
| FIS | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.06 | − 0.11 | − 0.10 | 0.03 | |
| P | 0.00* | 0.00* | 0.00* | 0.00* | 0.12 | 0.00* | |
| AG2H143 | HO | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| HE | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.63 | |
| FIS | 0.12 | 0.09 | − 0.44 | − 0.30 | − 0.08 | 0.07 | |
| P | 0.001* | 0.20 | 0.00* | 0.00* | 0.02* | 0.38 | |
| AG3H29 | HO | – | 0.12 | – | – | – | 0.08 |
| HE | – | 0.11 | – | – | – | 0.08 | |
| FIS | – | − 0.05 | – | – | – | − 0.03 | |
| P | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | |
| AG3H45 | HO | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.94 |
| HE | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | |
| FIS | − 0.04 | − 0.35 | 0.16 | − 0.32 | − 0.27 | − 0.05 | |
| P | 0.73 | 0.00* | 0.01* | 0.00* | 0.00* | 0.00* | |
| AG3H158 | HO | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.31 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.72 |
| HE | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.69 | |
| FIS | 0.09 | − 0.35 | 0.16 | − 0.32 | − 0.27 | − 0.05 | |
| P | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.00* |
H = observed heterozygosity, H = expected heterozygosity, FIS = inbreeding coefficient, high positive values indicate deficiency of heterozygotes, while small or negative values indicate excess of heterozygotes
p = significance of deviation from HWE (p < 0.05), * = significant deviation from HWE
Results of AMOVA of Anopheles arabiensis populations inferred by microsatellite markers
| Source of variation | d.f | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Fixation indices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 2 | 0.06 | 2.75 | FCT: 0.16 | < 0.001 |
| Among populations within groups | 3 | 0.30 | 13.61 | FSC: 0.14 | < 0.001 |
| Within population | 394 | 1.84 | 83.63 | 0.03 | 0.003 |
Population differentiation of Anopheles arabiensis as estimated using Wright’s pairwise FST
| * | ||||||
| Gw | * | |||||
| H.sh | 0.08 | * | ||||
| Hj | 0.11 | 0.12 | * | |||
| My | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.11 | * | ||
| Se | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.06 | * | |
| Kr | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.19 | * |
Gene flow estimates between populations of Anopheles arabiensis in Sudan
| 0 | Gw | H.sh | Hj | My | Se | Kr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gw | 0 | 426.5 | 5.38 | 15.55 | 323.1 | 443.21 |
| H.sh | 5.89 | 0 | 448.59 | 416.55 | 429.31 | 12.88 |
| Hj | 4.06 | 3.51 | 0 | 3.93 | 311.55 | 427.72 |
| My | 3.48 | 4.07 | 3.81 | 0 | 292.07 | 431.75 |
| Se | 2.22 | 2.71 | 2.47 | 9.05 | 0 | 334.01 |
| Kr | 1.69 | 2.30 | 1.50 | 1.88 | 1.97 | 0 |
Geographical distance (km) between sites
Nm, gene flow between An. arabiensis populations
Bottleneck analysis of An. arabiensis populations from six areas in Sudan
| Area | IAM | TPM | SMM | Mode-shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hj (n = 32) | 0.016 | 0.031 | 0.109 | Shifted |
| Gw (n = 33) | 0.031 | 0.438 | 0.438 | Normal |
| My (n = 34) | 0.047 | 0.438 | 0.844 | Normal |
| Se (n = 33) | 0.078 | 0.563 | 0.563 | Normal |
| H.sh (n = 34) | 0.039 | 0.375 | 0.299 | Normal |
| Kr (n = 34) | 0.023 | 0.055 | 0.688 | Normal |
Fig. 3Scatter plot of the relationship between genetic and geographic distances. No significant correlation between genetic differentiation and geographic distance among Anopheles arabiensis populations
Fig. 4Graphical analysis using STUCTURE.HARVESTER. Representation of the data set for the populations most likely K (K = 2)
Fig. 5Graphical Bayesian cluster analysis using STRUCTURE. Representation of the data set for the most likely K (K = 2), where each colour corresponds to a suggested cluster. Subpopulation A (red colour) includes Hj, Gw, My and H.sh populations and subpopulation B (green colour) includes Se and Kr populations
Fig. 6Phylogenetic tree based on Neighbour Joining method. The phylogenetic tree of An. arabiensis populations from Sudan. Hj, GW and H.sh, My and Se are highly genetically related, while Kr appeared to be highly differentiated from other populations