Literature DB >> 18697315

Contribution of different aquatic habitats to adult Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) production in a rice agroecosystem in Mwea, Kenya.

Joseph M Mwangangi1, Ephantus J Muturi, Josephat Shililu, Simon M Muriu, Benjamin Jacob, Ephantus W Kabiru, Charles M Mbogo, John Githure, Robert Novak.   

Abstract

Studies were conducted to determine the contribution of diverse larval habitats to adult Anopheles arabiensis Patton and Culex quinquefasciatus Say production in a rice land agro-ecosystem in Mwea, Kenya. Two sizes of cages were placed in different habitat types to investigate the influence of non-mosquito invertebrates on larval mortalities and the contribution of each habitat type to mosquito productivities, respectively. These emergence traps had fine netting material covers to prevent adult mosquitoes from ovipositing in the area covered by the trap and immature mosquitoes from entering the cages. The emergence of Anopheles arabiensis in seeps, tire tracks, temporary pools, and paddies was 10.53%, 17.31%, 12.50%, and 2.14%, respectively, while the corresponding values for Cx. quinquefasciatus were 16.85% in tire tracks, 8.39% in temporary pools, and 5.65% in the paddies from 0.125 m3 cages during the study. Cages measuring 1 m3 were placed in different habitat types which included paddy, swamp, marsh, ditch, pool, and seep to determine larval habitat productivity. An. arabiensis was the predominant anopheline species (98.0%, n = 232), although a few Anopheles coustani Laveran (2.0%, n = 5) emerged from the habitats. The productivity for An. arabiensis larvae was 6.0 mosquitoes per m2 for the temporary pools, 5.5 for paddy, 5.4 for marsh, 2.7 for ditch, and 0.6 for seep. The Cx. quinquefasciatus larval habitat productivity was 47.8 mosquitoes per m2 for paddies, 35.7 for ditches, 11.1 for marshes, 4.2 for seeps, 2.4 for swamps, and 1.0 for temporary pools. Pools, paddy, and marsh habitat types were the most productive larval habitats for An. arabiensis while paddy, ditch, and marsh were the most productive larval habitats for Cx. quinquefasciatus. The most common non-mosquito invertebrate composition in the cages included Dytiscidae, Notonectidae, Belostomatidae, and Ephemerellidae, and their presence negatively affected the number of emergent mosquitoes from the cages. In conclusion, freshly formed habitats are the most productive aquatic habitats, while old and more permanent habitats are the least productive due to natural regulation of mosquito immatures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697315     DOI: 10.3376/1081-1710(2008)33[129:codaht]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vector Ecol        ISSN: 1081-1710            Impact factor:   1.671


  11 in total

1.  Population genetic structure of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in a rice growing area of central Kenya.

Authors:  Ephantus J Muturi; Chang-Hyun Kim; Frederick N Baliraine; Solomon Musani; Benjamin Jacob; John Githure; Robert J Novak
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Interspecies predation between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.

Authors:  Ephantus J Muturi; Chang-Hyun Kim; Benjamin Jacob; Shannon Murphy; Robert J Novak
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Evaluation of two methods of estimating larval habitat productivity in western Kenya highlands.

Authors:  Eliningaya J Kweka; Guofa Zhou; Ming-Chieh Lee; Thomas M Gilbreath; Franklin Mosha; Stephen Munga; Andrew K Githeko; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Effects of co-habitation between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus aquatic stages on life history traits.

Authors:  Eliningaya J Kweka; Goufa Zhou; Leila B Beilhe; Amruta Dixit; Yaw Afrane; Thomas M Gilbreath; Stephen Munga; Mramba Nyindo; Andrew K Githeko; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of immature culicines (subfamily Culicinae) and their larval habitats in Mwea Rice Scheme, Kenya.

Authors:  Ephantus J Muturi; Joseph M Mwangangi; Benjamin G Jacob; Josephat I Shililu; Charles M Mbogo; John I Githure; Robert J Novak
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Predation efficiency of Anopheles gambiae larvae by aquatic predators in western Kenya highlands.

Authors:  Eliningaya J Kweka; Guofa Zhou; Thomas M Gilbreath; Yaw Afrane; Mramba Nyindo; Andrew K Githeko; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Overhead tank is the potential breeding habitat of Anopheles stephensi in an urban transmission setting of Chennai, India.

Authors:  Shalu Thomas; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; Johnson A Justin; Aswin Asokan; Manu T Mathai; Neena Valecha; Matthew B Thomas; Alex Eapen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Synergism between nonane and emanations from soil as cues in oviposition-site selection of natural populations of Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Victor S Mwingira; Leonard E G Mboera; Willem Takken
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Mesocosm Experiments to Quantify Predation of Mosquito Larvae by Aquatic Predators to Determine Potential of Ecological Control of Malaria Vectors in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Beekam Kebede Olkeba; Peter L M Goethals; Pieter Boets; Luc Duchateau; Teshome Degefa; Kasahun Eba; Delenasaw Yewhalaw; Seid Tiku Mereta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Anopheles larval species composition and characterization of breeding habitats in two localities in the Ghibe River Basin, southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dejene Getachew; Meshesha Balkew; Habte Tekie
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.