| Literature DB >> 34923954 |
Xing-Xuan Dong1, Rui-Rui Wang1, Jie-Yu Liu1, Qing-Hua Ma2, Chen-Wei Pan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of tea consumption on metabolic syndrome (MetS) remains controversial. The objective of this study is to examine the prospective association of tea consumption with 5-year incident MetS among aged population in China.Entities:
Keywords: Cohort study; Metabolic syndrome; Older adults; Tea consumption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34923954 PMCID: PMC8684663 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02707-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Characteristics of study participants according to tea consumption habits
| Characteristic | All persons ( | Non-habitual tea drinkers ( | Habitual tea drinkers ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (women), n (%) | 1458(48.5) | 1297(67.3) | 161(14.9) | < 0.001 |
| Age, mean(SD), years | 67.3(5.7) | 67.5(5.9) | 67.0(5.4) | 0.01 |
| Living with spouse, n (%) | 2506(83.4) | 1567(81.3) | 939(87.2) | < 0.001 |
| Primary and below education, n (%) | 2597(86.4) | 1766(91.6) | 831(77.2) | < 0.001 |
| Monthly income, n (%) | < 0.001 | |||
| ≤ 1000 CNY | 1682(56.0) | 1177(61.0) | 505(46.9) | |
| 1001–3000 CNY | 1101(36.6) | 656(34.0) | 445(41.3) | |
| > 3000 CNY | 222(7.4) | 95(4.9) | 127(11.8) | |
| Current smoking, n (%) | 844(28.1) | 271(14.1) | 573(53.2) | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol consumption, n (%) | 749(24.9) | 252(13.1) | 497(46.1) | < 0.001 |
| Physical activity, n (%) | 1273(42.4) | 754(39.1) | 519(48.2) | < 0.001 |
| Working, n (%) | 1135(37.8) | 671(34.8) | 464(43.1) | < 0.001 |
| SBP, mean(SD), mmHg | 142.4(19.6) | 143.9(19.6) | 139.6(19.3) | < 0.001 |
| DBP, mean(SD), mmHg | 84.9(11.3) | 84.8(11.3) | 85.1(11.3) | 0.46 |
| BMI, mean(SD), kg/m2 | 22.9(4.9) | 22.8(5.8) | 23.1(2.4) | 0.11 |
| HDL-C, mean(SD), mmol/L | 1.6(0.4) | 1.6(0.4) | 1.5(0.4) | < 0.001 |
| TG, mean(SD), mmol/L | 1.1(0.5) | 1.1 (0.5) | 1.1(0.6) | 0.44 |
| FPG, mean(SD), mmol/L | 5.4(0.9) | 5.4(0.9) | 5.4(0.9) | 0.24 |
| History of hypertension, n (%) | 1481(49.3) | 932(48.3) | 549(51.0) | 0.17 |
| History of diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 120(4.0) | 76(3.9) | 44(4.1) | 0.85 |
| SBP, mean(SD), mmHg | 148.9(21.0) | 150.1(21.2) | 146.6(20.4) | < 0.001 |
| DBP, mean(SD), mmHg | 82.1(11.5) | 81.6(11.5) | 83.1(11.3) | 0.001 |
| BMI, mean(SD), kg/m2 | 23.6(3.6) | 23.5(3.8) | 23.8(3.0) | 0.05 |
| HDL-C, mean(SD), mmol/L | 1.6(0.4) | 1.6(0.4) | 1.5(0.4) | < 0.001 |
| TG, mean(SD), mmol/L | 1.2(0.7) | 1.3 (0.7) | 1.2(0.7) | 0.27 |
| FPG, mean(SD), mmol/L | 5.7(1.0) | 5.6(0.9) | 5.7(1.1) | 0.17 |
| Metabolic syndrome, n (%) | 406(13.5) | 263(13.6) | 143(13.3) | 0.78 |
SD Standard deviation, CNY Chinese Yuan, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, BMI Body mass index, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG Triglycerides, FPG Fasting plasma glucose
Fig. 1Sensitivity analysis of different characteristics and tea consumption habits of the study participants
Association of tea consumption and related variables with metabolic syndrome
| Characteristics | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Men | Women | All | Men | Women | |||||||
| OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | |||||||
| Non-habitual drinker | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Habitual drinker | 1.37(1.06, 1.78) | 0.02 | 1.38(0.99,1.94) | 0.06 | 1.35(0.90,2.03) | 0.15 | 1.31(1.01, 1.71) | 0.04 | 1.38(0.98,1.95) | 0.06 | 1.17(0.76,1.79) | 0.48 |
| 0 times/week | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1–5 times/week | 1.06(0.60, 1.86) | 0.84 | 0.95(0.42,2.18) | 0.91 | 1.17(0.53,2.54) | 0.70 | 0.99(0.56,1.76) | 0.98 | 0.95(0.41,2.16) | 0.90 | 0.90(0.40,2.04) | 0.80 |
| > 5 times/week | 1.44(1.09, 1.89) | 0.01 | 1.43(1.01,2.01) | 0.04 | 1.42(0.89,2.27) | 0.14 | 1.38(1.05,1.82) | 0.02 | 1.43(1.00,2.01) | 0.05 | 1.28(0.79,2.08) | 0.32 |
| Non-habitual drinker | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Green tea | 1.32(1.01, 1.73) | 0.04 | 1.28(0.92,1.78) | 0.15 | 1.42(0.89,2.26) | 0.14 | 1.27(0.97, 1.67) | 0.09 | 1.26(0.91,1.76) | 0.17 | 1.22(0.75,1.99) | 0.42 |
| Other | 1.29(0.76, 2.20) | 0.35 | 1.47(0.71,3.04) | 0.30 | 1.13(0.52,2.46) | 0.77 | 1.25(0.73, 2.15) | 0.41 | 1.57(0.75,3.27) | 0.23 | 1.00(0.45,2.22) | 1.00 |
| 0(Non-habitual drinker) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1–15 | 1.15(0.72, 1.85) | 0.55 | 0.97(0.50,1.86) | 0.92 | 1.41(0.71,2.80) | 0.32 | 1.09 (0.68, 1.75) | 0.72 | 0.97(0.50,1.86) | 0.92 | 1.27(0.62,2.59) | 0.51 |
| 16–30 | 1.62(1.09, 2.41) | 0.02 | 1.38(0.84,2.26) | 0.20 | 2.34(1.17,4.69) | 0.01 | 1.53(1.02, 2.28) | 0.04 | 1.39(0.85,2.28) | 0.19 | 1.79(0.87,3.71) | 0.11 |
| > 30 | 1.34(0.98, 1.85) | 0.07 | 1.35(0.93,1.95) | 0.12 | 1.02(0.49,2.12) | 0.96 | 1.31(0.95, 1.80) | 0.11 | 1.33(0.92,1.94) | 0.13 | 0.94(0.44,1.97) | 0.86 |
Model 1, adjusted for age, gender
Model 2, adjusted for age, gender, initial BMI, educational level, monthly income, marriage status, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity
BP Blood pressure, BMI Body mass index, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG Triglycerides, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval
aTea consumption habits were collected at baseline
Fig. 2Risk of developing metabolic syndrome and its components according to tea consumption habits. BP, blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. *Tea consumption habits were collected at baseline. Model 1, adjusted for age, gender. Model 2, adjusted for age, gender, initial BMI, educational level, monthly income and marriage status