Literature DB >> 34923215

Characterization and implementation of a miniature X-ray system for live cell microscopy.

Surendra Prajapati1, Maëlle Locatelli2, Caleb Sawyer3, Julia Holmes2, Keith Bonin4, Paul Black5, Pierre-Alexandre Vidi6.   

Abstract

The study of radiation effects on biological tissues is a diverse field of research with direct applications to improve human health, in particular in the contexts of radiation therapy and space exploration. Understanding the DNA damage response following radiation exposure, which is a key determinant for mutagenesis, requires reproducible methods for delivering known doses of ionizing radiation (IR) in a controlled environment. Multiple IR sources, including research X-ray and gamma-ray irradiators are routinely used in basic and translational research with cell and animal models. These systems are however not ideal when a high temporal resolution is needed, for example to study early DNA damage responses with live cell microscopy. Here, we characterize the dose rate and beam properties of a commercial, miniature, affordable, and versatile X-ray source (Mini-X). We describe how to use Mini-X on the stage of a fluorescence microscope to deliver high IR dose rates (up to 29 Gy/min) or lower dose rates (≤ 0.1 Gy/min) in live cell imaging experiments. This article provides a blueprint for radiation biology applications with high temporal resolution, with a step-by-step guide to implement a miniature X-ray system on an imaging platform, and the information needed to characterize the system.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; Live imaging; Portable X-ray tube; Radiation effects

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34923215      PMCID: PMC9357266          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2021.111772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   3.151


  48 in total

1.  A new system for laser-UVA-microirradiation of living cells.

Authors:  J Walter; T Cremer; K Miyagawa; S Tashiro
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  The irradiation of individual parts of single cells in tissue culture with a microbeam of alpha-particles. I. Apparatus.

Authors:  M DAVIS; C L SMITH
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells.

Authors:  R E ZIRKLE; W BLOOM
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  An oligomerized 53BP1 tudor domain suffices for recognition of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Omar Zgheib; Kristopher Pataky; Juergen Brugger; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  DNA double-strand break repair capacity and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Da-Tian Bau; Yi-Chien Mau; Shian-Ling Ding; Pei-Ei Wu; Chen-Yang Shen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  PARP1-dependent kinetics of recruitment of MRE11 and NBS1 proteins to multiple DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Jean-François Haince; Darin McDonald; Amélie Rodrigue; Ugo Déry; Jean-Yves Masson; Michael J Hendzel; Guy G Poirier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation links the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5/SNF2H to RNF168-dependent DNA damage signaling.

Authors:  Godelieve Smeenk; Wouter W Wiegant; Jurgen A Marteijn; Martijn S Luijsterburg; Nicholas Sroczynski; Thomas Costelloe; Ron J Romeijn; Albert Pastink; Niels Mailand; Wim Vermeulen; Haico van Attikum
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Agata Smogorzewska; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Corey E Bakalarski; Zhenming Zhao; Nicole Solimini; Yaniv Lerenthal; Yosef Shiloh; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  L B Schultz; N H Chehab; A Malikzay; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12-25       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The study of protein recruitment to laser-induced DNA lesions can be distorted by photoconversion of the DNA binding dye Hoechst.

Authors:  Verena Hurst; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and coherence of chromatin motions.

Authors:  Maëlle Locatelli; Josh Lawrimore; Hua Lin; Sarvath Sanaullah; Clayton Seitz; Dave Segall; Paul Kefer; Naike Salvador Moreno; Benton Lietz; Rebecca Anderson; Julia Holmes; Chongli Yuan; George Holzwarth; Kerry S Bloom; Jing Liu; Keith Bonin; Pierre-Alexandre Vidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.