| Literature DB >> 34922455 |
Li Yang1, Qiang Xu2, Bin Yang3,2, Jiayu Li2, Rong Dong2, Jingjing Da2, Zhixu Ye2, Yongjie Xu2, Hourong Zhou2, Xiangyan Zhang2,4, Lin Liu2,4, Yan Zha2,4, Fuxun Yu5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) is a current worldwide threat for which the immunological features after infection need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to establish a highly sensitive and quantitative detection method for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody and to compare the antibody reaction difference in patients with different disease severity.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; IgG; Recombinant nucleocapsid protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34922455 PMCID: PMC8683808 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02401-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Expression and purification of rSARS-CoV-2-N protein. Recombinant plasmid containing the full length SARS-CoV-2 N gene was transformed into E. coli BL21 strain and induced with IPTG. E. coli cells were collected and dissolved in 10 mM PBS (PH 7.5) with 500 mM NaCl. After sonication, the E. coli cell lysate was centrifuged and the recombinant protein was purified from the supernatant by Talon™ IMAC affinity column. The E. coli cell lysate and the purified recombinant protein were analyzed using a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Lane 1: protein maker (Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: supernatant from sonicated E. coli cell lysate; Lane 3: pellet of sonicated E. coli cell lysate; Lane 4: purified recombinant protein
Fig. 2A western blot for the purified rSARS-CoV-2-N protein. The prestained protein marker and purified recombinant proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Each membrane was incubated with diluted patient’s serum or mouse immune serum, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated-goat anti-human IgG or anti-mouse IgG (1:1000 dilution), and detected by DAB staining. (A) Reactivity of recombinant proteins to COVID-19 patient serum (1:400 dilution). Lane 1: protein marker; Lane 2: purified rSARS-CoV-2-N protein. (B) Reactivity of recombinant proteins to rSARS-CoV-2-N-immunized mouse serum (1:800 dilution). Lane 1: protein marker; Lane 2: purified rSARS-CoV-2-N protein
Checkerboard titration of rSARS-CoV-2-N based IgG ELISA
| 200 ng/well | 100 ng/well | 50 ng/well | 25 ng/well | 12.5 ng/well | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P 1:100 | 2.953 | 2.803 | 2.561 | 2.182 | 1.699 |
| N 1:100 | 0.326 | 0.318 | 0.279 | 0.242 | 0.204 |
| P/N | 9.058 | 8.814 | 9.179 | 9.0165 | 8.328 |
| P 1:200 | 2.627 | 2.411 | 2.022 | 1.597 | 1.34 |
| N 1:200 | 0.28 | 0.264 | 0.259 | 0.236 | 0.173 |
| P/N | 9.382 | 9.133 | 7.807 | 6.767 | 7.746 |
| P 1:400 | 2.095 | 1.899 | 1.592 | 1.051 | 0.874 |
| N 1:400 | 0.254 | 0.196 | 0.129 | 0.106 | 0.04 |
| P/N | 8.248 | 9.689 | 12.341 | 9.915 | 21.85 |
| P 1:800 | 1.228 | 1.038 | 0.797 | 0.686 | 0.567 |
| N 1:800 | 0.215 | 0.193 | 0.17 | 0.084 | 0.032 |
| P/N | 5.712 | 5.378 | 4.688 | 8.167 | 17.719 |
The determination of optimal antigen coating concentration and dilution of serum
P: positive serum; N: negative serum; P/N: The ratio of the OD value of positive serum to negative serum
Sensitivity and specificity of SARS-CoV-2-N-IgG ELISA with reference to the Colloidal gold antibody detection kit
| Colloidal gold antibody detection kit | r-SARS-CoV-2-N based IgG ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Negative | |||
| Positive | 174 | 0 | 174 |
| Negative | 6 | 182 | 188 |
| Total | 180 | 182 | 362 |
| Concordance a: 98.3% | Sensitivity b: 100% | Specificity c: 96.8% | |
χ2 = 3.702, p > 0.05
The sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2-N IgG ELISA compared to the Colloidal gold antibody detection kit
a) (The number of positive samples detected by both methods + the number of samples determined to be negative by both methods)/the total number × 100
b) True positive (true positive + false negative) ×100
c) True negative (true negative – false positive) × 100
Sensitivity and specificity of SARS-CoV-2-N-IgG ELISA with reference to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 Protein IgG Antibody ELISA Kit
| SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 Protein IgG antibody ELISA Kit | r-SARS-CoV-2-N based IgG ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Negative | |||
| Positive | 178 | 0 | 178 |
| Negative | 2 | 182 | 184 |
| Total | 180 | 182 | 362 |
| Concordance a: 99.4% | Sensitivity b: 100% | Specificity c: 98.9% | |
χ2 = 0.678, p > 0.05
The sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2-N IgG ELISA compared to the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein IgG antibody kit
a) (The number of positive samples detected by both methods + the number of samples determined to be negative by both methods)/the total number × 100
b) True positive (true positive + false negative) × 100
c) True negative (true negative – false positive) × 100
Geometric mean titer of different severity groups
| Group | No. of serum samples | Range of antibody titer | Geometric mean titer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | 800–51,200 | 9590 |
| 2 | 48 | 800–102,400 | 20,912 |
| 3 | 16 | 12,800–102,400 | 51,203 |
The Geometric mean titer for the difference severity groups
Group 1 - asymptomatic and mild case; group 2 - moderate cases; group 3 - severe and critical cases
Fig. 3Difference in serum titer for the different severity. Group 1: SARS-CoV-2-N IgG antibody titer for 24 asymptomatic and mild cases; Group 2: SARS-CoV-2-N IgG antibody titer for 48 moderate cases; Group 3: SARS-CoV-2-N IgG antibody titer for 16 severe and critical cases. The significance of the difference was indicated using ‘* ‘(p < 0.05) and ‘*** ‘(p = 0.000)