Literature DB >> 28850918

Normal composite face effects in developmental prosopagnosia.

Federica Biotti1, Esther Wu2, Hua Yang3, Guo Jiahui2, Bradley Duchaine2, Richard Cook4.   

Abstract

Upright face perception is thought to involve holistic processing, whereby local features are integrated into a unified whole. Consistent with this view, the top half of one face appears to fuse perceptually with the bottom half of another, when aligned spatially and presented upright. This 'composite face effect' reveals a tendency to integrate information from disparate regions when faces are presented canonically. In recent years, the relationship between susceptibility to the composite effect and face recognition ability has received extensive attention both in participants with normal face recognition and participants with developmental prosopagnosia. Previous results suggest that individuals with developmental prosopagnosia may show reduced susceptibility to the effect suggestive of diminished holistic face processing. Here we describe two studies that examine whether developmental prosopagnosia is associated with reduced composite face effects. Despite using independent samples of developmental prosopagnosics and different composite procedures, we find no evidence for reduced composite face effects. The experiments yielded similar results; highly significant composite effects in both prosopagnosic groups that were similar in magnitude to the effects found in participants with normal face processing. The composite face effects exhibited by both samples and the controls were greatly diminished when stimulus arrangements were inverted. Our finding that the whole-face binding process indexed by the composite effect is intact in developmental prosopagnosia indicates that other factors are responsible for developmental prosopagnosia. These results are also inconsistent with suggestions that susceptibility to the composite face effect and face recognition ability are tightly linked. While the holistic process revealed by the composite face effect may be necessary for typical face perception, it is not sufficient; individual differences in face recognition ability likely reflect variability in multiple sequential processes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite face effect; Developmental prosopagnosia; Holistic face processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28850918     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  An update of the Benton Facial Recognition Test.

Authors:  Ebony Murray; Rachel Bennetts; Jeremy Tree; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

3.  Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.

Authors:  Lisa Stacchi; Eva Huguenin-Elie; Roberto Caldara; Meike Ramon
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-02-19

4.  Normal recognition of famous voices in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Richard Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The discrimination of facial sex in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jade E Marsh; Federica Biotti; Richard Cook; Katie L H Gray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Oxford Face Matching Test: A non-biased test of the full range of individual differences in face perception.

Authors:  Mirta Stantic; Rebecca Brewer; Bradley Duchaine; Michael J Banissy; Sarah Bate; Tirta Susilo; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.