Jordi Heijman1, Ann-Kathrin Rahm2, Dobromir Dobrev3,4,5. 1. Department of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University and Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiology and Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders (HCR), University Hospital Heidelberg and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Institute of Pharmacology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 4. Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. 5. Departments of Medicine and Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.
Atrial fibrillation remains a major health burden, negatively affecting the morbidity and mortality of >55 million patients worldwide [1]. Although much has been learned about the molecular basis of AF, many challenges remain in the translation of basic discoveries to clinical application [2], [3]. There is increasing evidence that safe and effective rhythm control therapy (i.e., restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm) may improve clinical outcomes of AF patients, particularly when initiated early, before AF-related remodeling renders the disease unresponsive to therapy [4]. Catheter ablation is more effective at maintaining normal sinus rhythm than currently available antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) [1]. However, given the large number of AF patients, AADs will remain a cornerstone of AF therapy for many years to come [5]. Current AADs were developed in the absence of information on the heterogeneous mechanisms underlying AF initation and progression and are used in a one-size-fits-all manner, partially explaining their limited efficacy [5], [6]. Moreover, these AADs do not discriminate between atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, resulting in a significant risk of ventricular proarrhythmia that, together with non-cardiac side effects, greatly limits their use in clinical practice [1], [5]. Thus, there is a clear need for safer, more effective AADs for rhythm control of AF.Atrial-selective AADs, targeting ion channels primarily expressed in the atria or exploiting differences in channel gating due to differences in resting membrane potential between atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, are expected to be devoid of ventricular proarrhythmic side effects [5], [7]. Moreover, given the lower proarrhythmic proclivity of atrial-selective AADs, it may be possible to employ higher doses to increase antiarrhythmic efficacy. Several targets have been explored, including a number of repolarizing potassium channels primarily expressed in the atria [6], [7]. Inhibition of these channels prolongs the atrial effective refractory period (ERP), destabilizing AF-maintaining reentry. Blockers of the ultra-rapid delayed-rectifier potassium current (IKur) were the first prototypical atrial-selective AADs. Although IKur blockers showed promise in cellular and animal models, prolonging atrial ERP without significant effect on ventricular repolarization, their antiarrhythmic effects in clinical studies were disappointing [5], [7]. Similarly, blockers of the acetylcholine-activated inward-rectifier potassium current (IK,ACh), which develops calcium-dependent constitutive (receptor-independent) activity in AF [8], [9], [10], contributing to proarrhythmic shortening of atrial ERP, have shown antiarrhythmic effects in some animal models [7]. However, the compounds tested to date were either not effective in humans or were limited in their use because of adverse central nervous effects [7]. Thus, the antiarrhythmic potential of atrial-selective IK,ACh inhibition still requires direct clinical verification.More recently, small-conductance calcium-activated potassium (SK or KCa2.X) channels, encoded by the KCNN1-3 genes, have been proposed as targets for atrial-predominant rhyhm-control therapy [7]. Indeed, common variants in both KCNN2 and KCNN3 have been associated with AF in genome-wide association studies [11] and inhibition of SK channels prolongs atrial repolarization [12]. Besides the bee-venom toxin apamin, often used to identify ISK experimentally, several SK-channel inhibitors with different modes of action have significant antiarrhythmic effects in various animal models [6], [7]. For example, SK-channel inhibitors prolong atrial ERP and reduce the duration of acutely induced AF in pigs subjected to 1 week of atrial tachycardia remodeling [7], [13]. Moreover, SK-channel inhibition could terminate a more persistent, vernakalant-resistant form of AF obtained using long-lasting rapid atrial pacing protocols and could prevent reinduction of AF under these conditions in pigs [13], suggesting a potential future use for long-term rhythm-control therapy. However, in a horse model of persistent AF treatment with the SK-channel inhibitor NS8593 was unable to induce cardioversion [14], indicating that species differences and AF induction mechanism may play a critical role in SK-channel inhibitor efficacy.In the present issue of the International Journal of Cardiology Heart and Vasculature, Yan et al. [15] investigated the antiarrhythmic effects of the SK-channel inhibitor N-(pyridin-2-yl)-4-(pyridin-2-yl)thiazol-2-amine (ICA) in an ex-vivo rabbit atrial model with balloon-mediated atrial dilatation. The authors show that ICA prolongs atrial repolarization duration and reduces the stretch-induced shortening of atrial ERP. Moreover, total AF duration increased linearly with balloon pressure and SK-channel inhibition reduced the occurence of burst pacing-induced AF during stretch. As such, these data further support the notion that SK-channel inhibition may be an effective rhythm control strategy in AF patients.Atrial stretch and associated dilatation are well-accepted risk factors for AF, with AF itself promoting further atrial dilatation. In the chronic setting, atrial stretch induces reentry-promoting structural remodeling and dilated atria provide a larger substrate that can sustain more drivers, making arrhythmia termination less likely. Moreover, acute stretch, which may be clinically relevant in postoperative AF [16], shortens atrial ERP and slows conduction via stretch-activated and stretch-modulated ion channels, acutely promoting atrial arrhythmogenesis. In addition, acute stretch is associated with alterations in intracellular calcium through calcium influx via stretch-activated channels (e.g., transient-receptor potential channels), stretch-dependent modulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels (including Cav1.2), or increased calcium leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via ryanodine receptor channels [17]. Subsequent activation of SK channels, which are located in the immediate vicinity of Cav1.2 and ryanodine receptor channels [18], may therefore directly contribute to proarrhythmic stretch-induced ERP shortening, potentially explaining the antiarrhythmic efficacy of SK-channel inhibition under these conditions. However, direct proof is still lacking and the significant prolongation of baseline ERP (in the absence of stretch) may already be sufficient to modulate the arrhythmogenic risk. Of note, the atrial burst-pacing used to induce AF in the current study [15] would also be expected to promote calcium loading and subsequent activation of SK-currents. In agreement, previous work has identified a role for SK-channels in the reinduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardioversion by creating a mismatch between short repolarization duration and large, long calcium transients [18]. These factors may contribute to an overestimation of the importance of SK channels in the work by Yan et al. [15].Despite the promising results in various animal models with clinically relevant risk factors such as atrial stretch, the antiarrhythmic potential of SK-channel inhibition in patients remains uncertain. This may be in part due to the incomplete understanding of the complexity of SK-channel remodeling and its effects on atrial electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. ISK is upregulated in different animal models with atrial tachypacing [18], but results in humans are variable. A number of studies have reported downregulation of some of the KCNN genes in AF patients [19], [20], but results may depend on the atrial chamber of interest (with KCNN1 expression increased in the left atrium of patients with AF and heart failure, but decreased in the right atrium [21]), and presence of systemic modulators [22]. For example, in HL-1 mouse atrial cardiomyocytes, stretch and β-adrenergic stimulation decreased KCNN1 mRNA levels, whereas tachypacing and hypoxia suppressed KCNN3 expression. On the other hand, expression of KCNN2, the most abundant isoform in human atria, was specifically enhanced by hypoxia [22]. Importantly, mRNA levels may be poor indicators of functional SK-channel remodeling since experimental studies have indicated an important role for SK-channel trafficking in the AF-associated increase in ISK
[18]. Both increased and decreased ISK have been reported in atrial cardiomyocytes from Chinese AF populations [23], [24], but results in individuals with European ancestry are scarse, although one study reported a reduced repolarization prolonging effect of the SK-channel inhibitors NS8593 and ICAGEN in atrial cardiomyocytes from AF patients compared to sinus rhythm controls [19].Taken together, the development of atrial-selective AADs remains a promising avenue for improving AF management. SK-channels are an interesting target, with numerous promising studies in a wide range of different animal models, including the data in the presence of acute atrial stretch presented by Yan et al. [15]. However, mechanisms of SK-channel remodeling, as well as antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of SK-channel inhibition will need to be investigated in human atrial samples and appropriately designed clinical trials. Safety is a particular concern in light of the upregulation of KCNN expression in ventricular samples of heart failure patients [20] and ventricular proarrhythmic effects of SK-channel inhibition observed in animal models [18]. Furthermore, the metabolic relevance of SK2 and SK3 expression in mitochondria has to be evaluated in human samples to assess potential safety issues in patients with e.g., ischemic heart disease [25]. Results of initial ongoing (e.g., NCT04571385) and future clinical trials are eagerly awaited to see if the current boundaries of AAD therapy for AF can be stretched and the management of AF patients can be improved.
Funding
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO/ZonMW Vidi09150171910029 to J.H.), Heidelberg University Medical Faculty (Olympia Morata Program) to A-K.R, (R01HL136389, R01HL131517, and R01HL089598 to D.D.), the German Research Foundation (DFG, Do 769/4-1 to D.D.), and the European Union (large-scale integrative project MAESTRIA, No. 965286 to D.D.).
Disclosures
D.D. is member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Acession Pharma, which develops drugs aimed to target SK channels.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The other authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest
Authors: Bruno Reissmann; Günter Breithardt; A John Camm; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Andreas Metzner; Paulus Kirchhof Journal: Europace Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Merle Friederike Fenner; Giulia Gatta; Stefan Sattler; Marion Kuiper; Eva Melis Hesselkilde; Ditte M T Adler; Morten Smerup; Ulrich Schotten; Ulrik Sørensen; Jonas Goldin Diness; Thomas Jespersen; Sander Verheule; Arne Van Hunnik; Rikke Buhl Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Carolina Roselli; Mark D Chaffin; Lu-Chen Weng; Stefanie Aeschbacher; Gustav Ahlberg; Christine M Albert; Peter Almgren; Alvaro Alonso; Christopher D Anderson; Krishna G Aragam; Dan E Arking; John Barnard; Traci M Bartz; Emelia J Benjamin; Nathan A Bihlmeyer; Joshua C Bis; Heather L Bloom; Eric Boerwinkle; Erwin B Bottinger; Jennifer A Brody; Hugh Calkins; Archie Campbell; Thomas P Cappola; John Carlquist; Daniel I Chasman; Lin Y Chen; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Eue-Keun Choi; Seung Hoan Choi; Ingrid E Christophersen; Mina K Chung; John W Cole; David Conen; James Cook; Harry J Crijns; Michael J Cutler; Scott M Damrauer; Brian R Daniels; Dawood Darbar; Graciela Delgado; Joshua C Denny; Martin Dichgans; Marcus Dörr; Elton A Dudink; Samuel C Dudley; Nada Esa; Tonu Esko; Markku Eskola; Diane Fatkin; Stephan B Felix; Ian Ford; Oscar H Franco; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Raji P Grewal; Vilmundur Gudnason; Xiuqing Guo; Namrata Gupta; Stefan Gustafsson; Rebecca Gutmann; Anders Hamsten; Tamara B Harris; Caroline Hayward; Susan R Heckbert; Jussi Hernesniemi; Lynne J Hocking; Albert Hofman; Andrea R V R Horimoto; Jie Huang; Paul L Huang; Jennifer Huffman; Erik Ingelsson; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Kaoru Ito; Jordi Jimenez-Conde; Renee Johnson; J Wouter Jukema; Stefan Kääb; Mika Kähönen; Yoichiro Kamatani; John P Kane; Adnan Kastrati; Sekar Kathiresan; Petra Katschnig-Winter; Maryam Kavousi; Thorsten Kessler; Bas L Kietselaer; Paulus Kirchhof; Marcus E Kleber; Stacey Knight; Jose E Krieger; Michiaki Kubo; Lenore J Launer; Jari Laurikka; Terho Lehtimäki; Kirsten Leineweber; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Man Li; Hong Euy Lim; Henry J Lin; Honghuang Lin; Lars Lind; Cecilia M Lindgren; Marja-Liisa Lokki; Barry London; Ruth J F Loos; Siew-Kee Low; Yingchang Lu; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Peter W Macfarlane; Patrik K Magnusson; Anubha Mahajan; Rainer Malik; Alfredo J Mansur; Gregory M Marcus; Lauren Margolin; Kenneth B Margulies; Winfried März; David D McManus; Olle Melander; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Jay A Montgomery; Michael P Morley; Andrew P Morris; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Andrea Natale; Saman Nazarian; Benjamin Neumann; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Maartje N Niemeijer; Kjell Nikus; Peter Nilsson; Raymond Noordam; Heidi Oellers; Morten S Olesen; Marju Orho-Melander; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Hui-Nam Pak; Guillaume Paré; Nancy L Pedersen; Joanna Pera; Alexandre Pereira; David Porteous; Bruce M Psaty; Sara L Pulit; Clive R Pullinger; Daniel J Rader; Lena Refsgaard; Marta Ribasés; Paul M Ridker; Michiel Rienstra; Lorenz Risch; Dan M Roden; Jonathan Rosand; Michael A Rosenberg; Natalia Rost; Jerome I Rotter; Samir Saba; Roopinder K Sandhu; Renate B Schnabel; Katharina Schramm; Heribert Schunkert; Claudia Schurman; Stuart A Scott; Ilkka Seppälä; Christian Shaffer; Svati Shah; Alaa A Shalaby; Jaemin Shim; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Joylene E Siland; Juha Sinisalo; Moritz F Sinner; Agnieszka Slowik; Albert V Smith; Blair H Smith; J Gustav Smith; Jonathan D Smith; Nicholas L Smith; Elsayed Z Soliman; Nona Sotoodehnia; Bruno H Stricker; Albert Sun; Han Sun; Jesper H Svendsen; Toshihiro Tanaka; Kahraman Tanriverdi; Kent D Taylor; Maris Teder-Laving; Alexander Teumer; Sébastien Thériault; Stella Trompet; Nathan R Tucker; Arnljot Tveit; Andre G Uitterlinden; Pim Van Der Harst; Isabelle C Van Gelder; David R Van Wagoner; Niek Verweij; Efthymia Vlachopoulou; Uwe Völker; Biqi Wang; Peter E Weeke; Bob Weijs; Raul Weiss; Stefan Weiss; Quinn S Wells; Kerri L Wiggins; Jorge A Wong; Daniel Woo; Bradford B Worrall; Pil-Sung Yang; Jie Yao; Zachary T Yoneda; Tanja Zeller; Lingyao Zeng; Steven A Lubitz; Kathryn L Lunetta; Patrick T Ellinor Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Teresa Wieder; Dominik Gramlich; Mara Elena Müller; Maximilian N Wunsch; Fadwa A El Tahry; Tanja Heimberger; Steffi Sandke; Tanja Weis; Patrick Most; Hugo A Katus; Dierk Thomas; Patrick Lugenbiel Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2021-06