Literature DB >> 34917731

Reconstruction of Sphenoid Wing Dysplasia in Neurofibromatosis Type-1 Patients: An Evolving Technique.

Mr Naveen Virin Goddard1, Mr Jonathan Dunne2, Mr Samim Ghorbanian2, Mr Simon Eccles2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neurofibromatosis type-1; arachnoid cyst decompression; reconstruction; sphenoid wing dysplasia; titanium implant

Year:  2021        PMID: 34917731      PMCID: PMC8666329          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPRAS Open        ISSN: 2352-5878


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1) is a genetic disorder affecting 1 in 2500 to 1 in 3000 people worldwide. NF-1 causes dysplasia of bone in addition to soft tissues, and sphenoid wing dysplasia is one such manifestation, occurring in 3–11% of patients. It is characterised by changes in the orbital volume, and progressive proptosis secondary to herniation of the temporal lobe into the orbit; however, reports of surgical correction are sparse. Sequelae are devastating, with abnormal ocular movements, optic nerve stretch, and ultimately loss of vision. The aim of this study was to report the evolution of a novel reconstructive technique for sphenoid wing dysplasia in four patients with NF-1.

Materials and Methods

All patients with NF-1 presenting to a single national referral unit between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020 were included. Data were reviewed retrospectively, and four patients who underwent surgical correction of sphenoid wing dysplasia were identified. A database was established to record patient demographics, surgical technique, complications, and visual and aesthetic outcomes.

Surgical Technique

A full pre-operative assessment of the patient is undertaken. Fine cut head and face computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast are performed to delineate the defect (Figure 1 A–D), and a custom-made three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium implant is developed based on the contralateral sphenoid bone in unilateral disease. In bilateral disease, it is modelled to reconstruct the defect as a best fit.
Figure 1

(A) 3D CT reconstruction of the sphenoid wing dysplasia defect. (B, C, D) CT planning of the custom-made titanium implants.

(A) 3D CT reconstruction of the sphenoid wing dysplasia defect. (B, C, D) CT planning of the custom-made titanium implants. The patient is positioned supine and craniofacial infiltration injected within maximal dose limits. A bicoronal incision is used to elevate the following: (1) an anteriorly based sub-Galeal flap to the junction of the superior orbital rim and orbital roof and (2) an anteriorly based pericranial flap. Temporo-parietal craniotomy is performed and the dura mater is incised. The associated arachnoid cyst of the temporal lobe is decompressed endoscopically to reduce the cerebral volume herniating through the dysplastic sphenoid wing, facilitating exposure of the defect. The titanium implant is secured to the margins of the defect with unicortical screws (Supplementary Figure 1 A, B), and the craniotomy bone flap is secured with titanium plates. A subcutaneous redivac drain is inserted, and the skin is closed with 4/0 Vicryl deep dermal sutures, with 4/0 Vicryl Rapide in children and staples in adults. A head bandage is applied for 48 h. The drain is removed at 48 h, or until drainage is less than 30 ml per 24 h.

Results

Four patients had sphenoid wing dysplasia requiring orbital reconstruction, with one patient having bilateral sphenoid wing reconstruction (Supplementary Figure 2). Two patients had no vision preoperatively, one had unchanged limited vision postoperatively, one had resolution of epiphora postoperatively and one had unchanged vision with subsequent surgery for a pre-existing left convergent squint. The first two cases had craniotomy and reconstruction with a non-anatomical titanium mesh. Access was difficult in these cases, and defining the posterolateral border of the defect required two assistants, with a less anatomically precise reconstruction, differing to the non-pathological side. The final three cases, performed on two patients, had endoscopic decompression of the arachnoid cyst to improve exposure of the defect, and a custom-made titanium 3D printed implant. Access and implant placement was significantly improved, and reconstruction modelled on the contralateral side, or a computer-based reconstruction in the bilateral case. One patient had a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, successfully managed with a shunt. Pre- and postoperative clinical photographs of two patients are shown in Supplementary Figure 3 (Supplementary Figure 3 A–I) and Supplementary Figure 4 (Supplementary Figure 4 A–J).

Discussion

This series details our management of sphenoid wing dysplasia in patients with NF-1 and is one of the largest reported to date. Orbital reconstruction in sphenoid wing dysplasia is a sight-preserving procedure, reducing optic nerve stretch, correcting proptosis and buphthalmos, and improving appearance. Our evolution towards arachnoid cyst decompression has significantly improved access and reduced the volume of temporal lobe prolapse. In addition, our refined reconstructive approach has accurately restored orbital volume using custom-made titanium implants. At present, there is still no accepted gold standard for the surgical management of the defects resulting from sphenoid wing dysplasia. In our centre, all patients are managed by a multidisciplinary team, with every relevant medical, surgical and psychological subspecialties involved throughout. In our practice, surgical intervention is guided by visual symptoms, rate of expansion of orbital volume and degree of proptosis. Evidence of progressive visual impairment in conjunction with temporal lobe herniation due to sphenoid wing dysplasia mandates surgery (Supplementary Figure 5 A–D). This cohort of patients presented to us with sphenoid wing dysplasia and established herniation with visual deterioration, and therefore surgery was required. Despite two patients having no vision preoperatively, surgery was still indicated to arrest the advancing herniation (Supplementary Figure 6 A–I). Where sphenoid wing dysplasia is in its early stages with the absence of visual deterioration, serial imaging is utilised to monitor for change. The objectives of surgery are to restore the barrier between the orbit and the temporal lobe, thus allowing the preservation of vision and improvement of ocular movement. For many years, titanium mesh has been used to repair defects as it offered a solution to bone resorption and recurrence of symptoms associated with traditional split bone grafts. However, the use of titanium mesh has been associated with the development of infection, adhesions and recurrence of dural herniation. Therefore, new techniques have been developed including the use of titanium mesh covered by lyophilised dura, which is reported to prevent the adherence of the mesh and the passage of meningoencephalocele through its permeations. In our series, we have not had any implant-related infections, and we believe that in the presence of healthy vascularised soft tissue cover, the risk is small. Other alloplastic materials such as high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP) and synthetic bone cement (polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)) have been used as alternatives to titanium mesh. However, both materials have limitations in their ability to contour to the native sphenoid wing and precisely reconstruct the defect. Use of custom-made 3D printed titanium implants precisely reconstructs the defect and eliminates the need for remodelling intraoperatively, while providing a thin and durable barrier between the cranium and orbit. Furthermore, improved access to the defect created through endoscopic decompression of arachnoid cysts, makes the placement and fixation of the implant simpler. Restoring orbital volume is a key factor in re-establishing optimal function and cosmesis. Measurement of orbital volume would be useful to monitor the progression of sphenoid wing dysplasia and provide assessment of pre- and postoperative changes. However, there is still no accepted gold standard for measuring the orbital volume, and therefore, it has not been adopted into our practice. Targeted medical strategies have the potential to dramatically alter the treatment landscape in NF-1 by reducing the volume of disease prior to surgery or eliminating the need for surgery entirely. Recent results from trials initiated by the Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium (NFCTC) have been extremely promising, demonstrating that Selumetinib (KOSELUGO, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK), a MEK inhibitor, can significantly reduce the size of NF1-associated plexiform neurofibromas. Indeed, in a recent phase II clinical trial, Selumetinib had a 72% response rate for volume reduction in inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. A future in which effective medical treatments for NF-1 tumours are available, alongside surgical interventions, may represent the future of management. However, as the advent of medical therapies to treat NF-1 is in its infancy, surgery remains the mainstay of managing this complex and debilitating condition. The orbital sequelae can be devastating, and our novel technique to reconstruct sphenoid wing dysplasia has durable results with a low complication rate. Supplementary Figure 1. (A, B) 3D CT reconstructions showing the titanium implants in situ.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None declared
  9 in total

1.  Sphenoid dysplasia in neurofibromatosis type 1: a new technique for repair.

Authors:  Concezio Di Rocc; Amir Samii; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Mario Giordano
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Overview of tools for the measurement of the orbital volume and their applications to orbital surgery.

Authors:  Camille Sentucq; Matthias Schlund; Benjamin Bouet; Martin Garms; Joel Ferri; Thibaut Jacques; Romain Nicot
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Prevalence of neurofibromatosis 1 in German children at elementary school enrollment.

Authors:  Marga Lammert; Jan M Friedman; Lan Kluwe; Victor F Mautner
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Calvarial defects and skeletal dysplasia in patients with neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Authors:  Daniel K Arrington; Amy R Danehy; Analise Peleggi; Mark R Proctor; Mira B Irons; Nicole J Ullrich
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Controversies in orbital reconstruction--I. Defect-driven orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Dubois; S A Steenen; P J J Gooris; M P Mourits; A G Becking
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas.

Authors:  Eva Dombi; Andrea Baldwin; Leigh J Marcus; Michael J Fisher; Brian Weiss; AeRang Kim; Patricia Whitcomb; Staci Martin; Lindsey E Aschbacher-Smith; Tilat A Rizvi; Jianqiang Wu; Rachel Ershler; Pamela Wolters; Janet Therrien; John Glod; Jean B Belasco; Elizabeth Schorry; Alessandra Brofferio; Amy J Starosta; Andrea Gillespie; Austin L Doyle; Nancy Ratner; Brigitte C Widemann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Transcranial correction of orbital neurofibromatosis.

Authors:  B J Snyder; A Hanieh; J A Trott; D J David
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Treatment of sphenoid dysplasia with a titanium-reinforced porous polyethylene implant in orbitofrontal neurofibroma: report of three cases.

Authors:  Jeremy Niddam; Romain Bosc; Tabrez M Suffee; Caroline Le Guerinel; Pierre Wolkenstein; Jean-Paul Meningaud
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  A multidisciplinary approach to sphenoid wing dysplasia presenting with pulsatile proptosis in neurofibromatosis Type 1: A rare case report.

Authors:  S Prathibha; Vandana Parasar; S Yasmin; V V Seetha Pramila
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.