Literature DB >> 25543903

Controversies in orbital reconstruction--I. Defect-driven orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.

L Dubois1, S A Steenen2, P J J Gooris2, M P Mourits3, A G Becking2.   

Abstract

In the 1980s, computed tomography was introduced as an imaging modality for diagnosing orbital fractures. Since then, new light has been shed on the field of orbital fracture management. Currently, most surgeons are likely to repair orbital fractures based on clinical findings and particularly on data obtained from computed tomography scans. However, an important but unresolved issue is the fracture size, which dictates the extent and type of reconstruction. In other fields of trauma surgery, an increasing body of evidence is stressing the importance of complexity-based treatment models. The aim of this study was to systematically review all articles on orbital reconstruction, with a focus on the indication for surgery and the defect size and location, in order to identify the reconstruction methods that show the best results for the different types of orbital fractures.
Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification of facial fractures; Indication; Orbit; Orbital fractures; Orbital reconstruction; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25543903     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  19 in total

1.  Automatic evaluation of the orbital shape after application of conventional and patient-specific implants: Correlation of initial trauma patterns and outcome.

Authors:  Yurii Chepurnyi; Denis Chernohorskyi; Olena Zhukovtceva; Arto Poutala; Andriy Kopchak
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 2.  Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kotecha; Ashley Ferro; Patrick Harrison; Kathleen Fan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures-An Alternative to Manual Evaluation.

Authors:  Mikko Saloniemi; Valtteri Lehtinen; Johanna Snäll
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-10-07

4.  Intraoperative Navigation and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Restoring Orbital Dimensions: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Brecht De Cuyper; Johan Abeloos; Gwen Swennen; Lies Pottel
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-02-18

5.  Quantifying Eye Alignment in Orbital Fracture Patients: The Digital Hess Screen.

Authors:  Sarah R Akkina; Aliya Shabbir; Annamarie Lahti; Raghu C Mudumbai; Christopher B Chambers; Kris S Moe; James O Phillips
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2020-05-22

6.  Orbital volume analysis: validation of a semi-automatic software segmentation method.

Authors:  Jesper Jansen; Ruud Schreurs; Leander Dubois; Thomas J J Maal; Peter J J Gooris; Alfred G Becking
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Patterns and prognosis of commotio retinae in orbital wall fractures.

Authors:  Halward M J Blegen; Joseph A Santamaria; Aditya Mehta; Donovan S Reed; Paul M Drayna; Brett Davies
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 8.  Considerations for the Management of Medial Orbital Wall Blowout Fracture.

Authors:  Yong-Ha Kim; Youngsoo Park; Kyu Jin Chung
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-18

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Orbital Implant Position--A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Ruud Schreurs; Leander Dubois; Alfred G Becking; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Role of Resorbable Plate and Artificial Bone Substitute in Reconstruction of Large Orbital Floor Defect.

Authors:  Ho Kwon; Ho Jun Kim; Bommie F Seo; Yeon Jin Jeong; Sung-No Jung; Hyung-Sup Shim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.