| Literature DB >> 34915254 |
Gaoliang Bao1, Jun Niu2, Shaobin Li3, Li Zhang4, Yuzhu Luo5.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of ultrasound pretreatment on the quality of dry-cured yak meat. The ultrasonic power with 0, 200, 300 and 400 W (ultrasonic frequency of 20 kHz) were used to assist processing of dry-cured yak meat. The meat quality, nutrient substances, sensory quality, electronic nose, electronic tongue and volatile compounds of dry-cured yak meat were determined. The results indicated that the moisture content and hardness value of ultrasonic treatment group was significantly lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Ultrasonic treatment increased the value of b*, and decreased the value of L*, a*, pH, chewiness, melting temperature and enthalpy. Springiness value significantly increased from control group to 300 W of ultrasonic power group. Shear force significantly decreased with the increase of ultrasonic power (P < 0.05). Ultrasonic treatment had no effect on the TVB-N content, but it could increase the TBARS content. Ultrasonic treatment could significantly increase the essential FAA (EFAA) and total FAA (P < 0.05). In addition, the saturated fatty acid (SFA) content significantly increased with the increase of ultrasonic power (P < 0.05). Ultrasound treatment negatively affected the meat's color, smell, and taste but increased its tenderness and the overall acceptability. It also significantly increased alcohols and aldehydes contents (P < 0.05), which were consistent with the measurement of electronic nose and electronic tongue. The results demonstrated that the the appropriate ultrasonic power assisted in the processing improves quality of dry-cured yak meat, particularly for the power of 300 W.Entities:
Keywords: Dry-cured yak meat; Meat quality; Nutrient substances; Ultrasound pretreatment; Volatile compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34915254 PMCID: PMC8683766 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491
Fig. 1The quality of dry-cured yak meat. (A) The moisture content and water activity. (B) Meat color (L*, a*, b*) and pH. (C) Hardness and springiness. (D) Shear force and chewiness. (E) TVB-N and TBARS. (F) Melting point and enthalpy of dry-cured yak meat in different group. Control, 200 W, 300 W and 400 W were four treatment groups. Different lowercase letters (a-d) represent significant differences at P < 0.05.
Effects of ultrasound power on free amino acids contents.
| FAA content (g/100 g) | Ultrasound Power (W) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 200 W | 300 W | 400 W | |
| Aspartic acid | 1.391 ± 0.073b | 1.352 ± 0.032b | 1.420 ± 0.046b | 1.938 ± 0.016a |
| Threonine1 | 2.497 ± 0.012a | 1.496 ± 0.100b | 1.096 ± 0.065c | 0.560 ± 0.004d |
| Serine | 0.793 ± 0.061b | 0.823 ± 0.011ab | 0.851 ± 0.041ab | 0.915 ± 0.017a |
| Glutamic acid | 3.635 ± 0.282a | 2.783 ± 0.042b | 2.554 ± 0.016b | 2.383 ± 0.040b |
| Glycine | 0.912 ± 0.025a | 0.822 ± 0.024ab | 0.817 ± 0.017b | 0.754 ± 0.054b |
| Alanine | 2.197 ± 0.177a | 1.943 ± 0.052ab | 1.748 ± 0.008bc | 1.541 ± 0.019c |
| Cysteine | 0.250 ± 0.030a | 0.168 ± 0.004b | 0.100 ± 0.008c | 0.083 ± 0.006c |
| Valine1 | 1.075 ± 0.083c | 1.215 ± 0.086bc | 1.353 ± 0.125b | 1.957 ± 0.041a |
| Methionine1 | 0.354 ± 0.066 | 0.351 ± 0.011 | 0.443 ± 0.010 | 0.455 ± 0.037 |
| Isoleucine1 | 0.607 ± 0.096d | 0.843 ± 0.068c | 1.107 ± 0.045b | 1.507 ± 0.045a |
| Leucine1 | 1.061 ± 0.073b | 1.861 ± 0.073a | 1.967 ± 0.042a | 2.012 ± 0.001a |
| Tyrosine | 0.972 ± 0.054d | 2.365 ± 0.057c | 2.673 ± 0.064b | 3.165 ± 0.042a |
| Phenylalanine1 | 0.959 ± 0.035d | 1.115 ± 0.028c | 1.434 ± 0.006b | 1.544 ± 0.044a |
| Lysine1 | 0.884 ± 0.001b | 1.510 ± 0.132a | 1.546 ± 0.011a | 1.530 ± 0.038a |
| Histidine | 1.068 ± 0.151a | 0.829 ± 0.005b | 0.788 ± 0.003b | 0.622 ± 0.028b |
| Arginine | 0.931 ± 0.008d | 1.672 ± 0.054c | 2.622 ± 0.009b | 3.261 ± 0.018a |
| Proline | 0.865 ± 0.023a | 0.726 ± 0.013b | 0.669 ± 0.028c | 0.696 ± 0.001bc |
| EFAA | 7.436 ± 0.295d | 8.391 ± 0.105c | 8.945 ± 0.049b | 9.565 ± 0.050a |
| NEFAA | 13.011 ± 0.272c | 13.481 ± 0.103c | 14.240 ± 0.004b | 15.355 ± 0.093a |
| Total FAA | 20.447 ± 0.566d | 21.871 ± 0.208c | 23.185 ± 0.053b | 24.920 ± 0.144a |
| EFAA/NEAA | 0.571 ± 0.011b | 0.629 ± 0.003a | 0.628 ± 0.003a | 0.623 ± 0.001a |
“1″ represents essential amino acids.
a-d Within a row, values with different superscript letters within the same line indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between the content of amino acids in different treatment groups. Values are shown as the mean values ± S.D.
Effects of ultrasound power on fatty acid contents.
| Fatty acid (g/100 g) | Ultrasound Power (W) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 200 W | 300 W | 400 W | |
| C11:0 | 0.83 ± 0.02ab | 0.75 ± 0.03b | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 0.89 ± 0.05 |
| C14:0 | 5.06 ± 0.02 | 4.28 ± 0.12b | 3.68 ± 0.08c | 2.72 ± 0.37d |
| C15:0 | 0.93 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.02b | 0.66 ± 0.01b | 0.66 ± 0.01b |
| C16:0 | 19.31 ± 0.67c | 21.62 ± 0.35b | 22.63 ± 0.17b | 25.30 ± 0.05 |
| C16:1 | 1.34 ± 0.01d | 2.59 ± 0.08c | 2.80 ± 0.01b | 3.14 ± 0.04 |
| C17:0 | 0.81 ± 0.03c | 0.83 ± 0.02c | 1.11 ± 0.05b | 3.90 ± 0.09 |
| C18:0 | 9.01 ± 0.50d | 10.38 ± 0.30c | 12.68 ± 0.27b | 15.90 ± 0.08 |
| C18:1 | 34.81 ± 0.03 | 31.96 ± 0.05b | 30.74 ± 0.76c | 27.61 ± 0.01d |
| C18:2 | 6.88 ± 0.16 | 6.01 ± 0.16b | 5.77 ± 0.01b | 4.33 ± 0.55c |
| C18:3 | 4.75 ± 0.11 | 4.90 ± 0.11 | 4.44 ± 0.10b | 3.33 ± 0.08c |
| C20:0 | 0.25 ± 0.02b | 0.11 ± 0.05c | 0.19 ± 0.02bc | 0.44 ± 0.02 |
| C20:3 | 1.90 ± 0.04 | 1.83 ± 0.11 | 1.39 ± 0.06b | 0.78 ± 0.05c |
| C20:4 | 5.37 ± 0.28 | 5.35 ± 0.09 | 4.29 ± 0.23b | 2.25 ± 0.02c |
| SFA | 36.18 ± 0.18d | 38.60 ± 0.15c | 41.78 ± 0.26b | 49.78 ± 0.38 |
| MUFA | 36.15 ± 0.04 | 34.54 ± 0.03b | 33.54 ± 0.78b | 30.75 ± 0.03c |
| PUFA | 18.89 ± 0.18 | 18.08 ± 0.25 | 15.89 ± 0.20b | 10.68 ± 0.70c |
| n-3 | 3.48 ± 0.04 | 3.35 ± 0.13ab | 3.17 ± 0.03b | 2.69 ± 0.13c |
| n-6 | 15.42 ± 0.15 | 14.73 ± 0.12 | 12.72 ± 0.17b | 7.99 ± 0.57c |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.01b | 0.38 ± 0.01c | 0.21 ± 0.02d |
| n-6/n-3 | 4.44 ± 0.01 | 4.40 ± 0.13 | 4.01 ± 0.01b | 2.97 ± 0.07c |
SFA, MUFA, PUFA and n represent saturated fatty acid, mono unsaturated fatty acid, poly unsaturated fatty acid and omega, respectively.
-d Within a row, values with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05). Values Data are shown as the mean values ± S.D.
Fig. 2Spider web chart of sensory properties data for dry-cured yak meat with different ultrasonic power treatments. Each value represents the average taste intensity of three measurements. Control, 200 W, 300 W and 400 W were four treatment groups.
Fig. 3Stacked bar charts of volatile compounds dry-cured yak meat of different treatments groups.
Fig. 4The radar chart and principal component analysis of electronic tongue data for dry-cured yak meat with different ultrasonic power (A). The radar chart and principal component analysis of electronic nose data for dry-cured yak meat with different ultrasonic power (B).
Extraction of the main component factors of different dry-cured yak meat qualities.
| Main ingredient | Eigenvalues | Contribution rate/% | Cumulative contribution rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | 32.54 | 77.50 | 77.50 |
| PC2 | 3.63 | 8.60 | 86.10 |
Fig. 5Factor loading diagram of two principal components of dry-cured ya meat. Control, 200 W, 300 W and 400 W were four treatment groups.