| Literature DB >> 34913829 |
Tracy A Nichols1, Eric M Nicholson2, Yihui Liu3, Wanyun Tao3, Terry R Spraker4, Michael Lavelle5, Justin Fischer5, Qingzhong Kong3, Kurt C VerCauteren5.
Abstract
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) continues to spread in both wild and captive cervid herds in North America and has now been identified in wild reindeer and moose in Norway, Finland and Sweden. There is limited knowledge about the variety and characteristics of isolates or strains of CWD that exist in the landscape and their implications on wild and captive cervid herds. In this study, we evaluated brain samples from two captive elk herds that had differing prevalence, history and timelines of CWD incidence. Site 1 had a 16-year history of CWD with a consistently low prevalence between 5% and 10%. Twelve of fourteen naïve animals placed on the site remained CWD negative after 5 years of residence. Site 2 herd had a nearly 40-year known history of CWD with long-term environmental accrual of prion leading to nearly 100% of naïve animals developing clinical CWD within two to 12 years. Obex samples of several elk from each site were compared for CWD prion strain deposition, genotype in prion protein gene codon 132, and conformational stability of CWD prions. CWD prions in the obex from site 2 had a lower conformational stability than those from site 1, which was independent of prnp genotype at codon 132. These findings suggest the existence of different CWD isolates between the two sites and suggest potential differential disease attack rates for different CWD strains.Entities:
Keywords: CWD; Cervus elaphus; cervus canadensis; chronic wasting disease; conformational stability; disease prevalence; elk; isolates; prion; strains
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34913829 PMCID: PMC8682864 DOI: 10.1080/19336896.2021.1982333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prion ISSN: 1933-6896 Impact factor: 3.931
Study animal location, ID, sex, and PrP genotypes in codon 132 (M. methionine; L. leucine) for CWD isolate evaluation
| Animal Site and ID | Sex | Age | Genotype at codon 132 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-A | M | 7 yr | ML |
| 1-B | F | 5 yr | MM |
| 2-A | F | Adult | MM |
| 2-B | F | Adult | MM |
| 2-C | F | Adult | ML |
| 2-D | F | Adult | ML |
Site 1 direct and indirect contact animals. group, ID, sex, incubation period (if applicable), CWD status at death, and PrP genotypes at codon 132 (M, methionine; L, leucine)
| Site 1 Indirect Contact Pen Animal ID | Sex | Incubation period | CWD Status at death | Genotype at codon 132 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S11 | M | >5 years | Non-detect | ML |
| 44 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 51 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 806 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 808 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 814 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| S12 | M | >5 years | Non-detect | LL |
| S13 | F | 1 year | Positive | MM |
| 58 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 800 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 801 T | M | 3 years | Positive | MM |
| 802 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 803 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
| 840 T | M | >5 years | Non-detect | MM |
Figure 1.The fibril stability of PrPSc from the two sites are different. (a) Representative fibril stability curves for samples from sites 1 and 2. The connecting lines are presented to aid the eye and highlight the point at which each unfolding curve intersects a fraction fibril of 0.5. Both Site 1-A and Site 1-B samples exhibit visibly higher fibril stability than the Site 2 samples based upon the concentration of GdnHCl at which the fraction fibril reaches 0.5 (Cmid). (b) Bargraph of quantified Cmid values of the site 1 and site 2 samples. The average Cmid value of site 1 samples (2.53 ± 0.05 M) is significantly higher than that of site 2 samples (2.16 ± 0.09 M) (p = 0.0043)
Figure 2.Western blot of CWD PrPRES in the brain tissues from Sites 1 and 2 elk. Four anti-PrP antibodies that target different PrP epitopes were used: 9A2 (epitope 97–115), 8H4 (epitope 177–180), and POM19 (epitope 201–225). POM19 does not recognize human PrP whereas 9A2 shows higher affinity for type 1 PrPRES. T1 and T2 are type 1 sCJD and type 2 sCJD human brain tissue controls, respectively. ‘CWD’ is a positive control elk CWD brain sample from an unrelated study. The loading amount was adjusted between the brain samples to allow more comparable signal strength for all samples with the same exposure: 5ul of 5% brain homogenate for 1-B, 1-A, 2-C and 2-A; 2ul of 5% brain homogenate for 2-D, 2-B and the control ‘CWD’ samples; 30ul of 5% brain homogenate for T1 and T2 human sCJD controls. The difference in sample loading volume was made up with 5% brain homogenate from PrPKO/FVB mice