| Literature DB >> 27216881 |
Tracy A Nichols1, Terry R Spraker2,3, Thomas Gidlewski1, Bruce Cummings2, Dana Hill3, Qingzhong Kong4, Aru Balachandran5, Kurt C VerCauteren1, Mark D Zabel3.
Abstract
Chronic wasting disease (CWD), the only known wildlife prion disease, affects deer, elk and moose. The disease is an ongoing and expanding problem in both wild and captive North American cervid populations and is difficult to control in part due to the extreme environmental persistence of prions, which can transmit disease years after initial contamination. The role of exogenous factors in CWD transmission and progression is largely unexplored. In an effort to understand the influence of environmental and dietary constituents on CWD, we collected and analyzed water and soil samples from CWD-negative and positive captive cervid facilities, as well as from wild CWD-endozootic areas. Our analysis revealed that, when compared with CWD-positive sites, CWD-negative sites had a significantly higher concentration of magnesium, and a higher magnesium/copper (Mg/Cu) ratio in the water than that from CWD-positive sites. When cevidized transgenic mice were fed a custom diet devoid of Mg and Cu and drinking water with varied Mg/Cu ratios, we found that higher Mg/Cu ratio resulted in significantly longer survival times after intracerebral CWD inoculation. We also detected reduced levels of inflammatory cytokine gene expression in mice fed a modified diet with a higher Mg/Cu ratio compared to those on a standard rodent diet. These findings indicate a role for dietary Mg and Cu in CWD pathogenesis through modulating inflammation in the brain.Entities:
Keywords: Cations; chronic wasting disease; copper; environment; iron; magnesium; manganese; metals; prion disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27216881 PMCID: PMC4981212 DOI: 10.1080/19336896.2016.1181249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prion ISSN: 1933-6896 Impact factor: 3.931
FIGURE 1.ICP-MS soil concentrations (ppb- parts per billion) of Mg (A), Cu (B), Fe (C) and Mn (D) from captive white-tailed deer and elk locations (n =16). No significant difference in cation concentration was detected between CWD-positive and CWD-negative locations (Two-tailed Student's T-test, α = 0.05) Mg (p = 0.719), Cu (p = 0.580), Fe (p = 0.335) and Mn (p = 0.732).
FIGURE 2.Soil Mg/cation ratio comparisons between CWD-positive and CWD-negative locations Mg/Cu (A), Mg/Mn (B), Mg/Fe (C) from captive white-tailed deer and elk locations. No significant difference was detected between any of the groups (Two-tailed Student's T-test, α = 0.05). Mg/Cu (p = 0.803), Mg/Mn (p = 0.936), Mg/Fe (p = 0.304).
Soil composition (by percent) at CWD-positive and negative sites. There was no statistically significant difference in composition between positive and negative sites (2-tailed Student's T-test, α = 0.05).
| Soil Constituent | Mean % at CWD- Sites | Mean% at CWD+ Sites | Statistical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Matter | 8.28 | 6.57 | |
| Quartz | 54.8 | 52.8 | |
| Silt | 13.6 | 12.8 | |
| Clay | 31.6 | 34.4 |
FIGURE 3.ICP-MS water concentrations (ppb = parts per billion) of Mg (A), Cu (B), Mn (C) and Fe (D) from captive white-tailed deer and elk locations. No significant difference in cation concentration was detected between CWD-positive and CWD-negative locations (Two-tailed Student's T-test, α = 0.05). Mg (p = 0.109) Cu (p = 0.227), Mn (p = 0.323), and Fe (p = 0.271).
FIGURE 4.Water Mg/cation ratio comparisons between CWD-positive and CWD-negative locations Mg/Cu (A), Mg/Mn (B), Mg/Fe (C) from captive white-tailed deer locations. A significant difference (*) was detected between all groups, with CWD-negative locations having greater Mg/cation ratios (Two-tailed Student's T-test, α = 0.05). Mg/Cu (p = 0.003), Mg/Mn (p = 0.007), Mg/Fe (p = 0.008).
FIGURE 5.Survival times (DPI-days post inoculation) versus Mg, Cu, or Mg/Cu ratio concentrations in CWD+ mouse diet. (A) Mg concentrations low to high, (B) Cu concentrations, low to high (C) and Mg/Cu expressed as a ratio, low to high. The Mg/Cu ratio showed the most positive influence on survival time (slope: 0.02600), followed by the negative influence of Cu (slope: −0.00023), and a modest increase on survival time by Mg (slope: 0.00007).
FIGURE 6.ICP-MS analysis of mouse brains from each group. (A) Cu concentration comparisons between CWD-negative (−) and CWD-positive (+) mice from each treatment group. (B) Mg concentration comparisons between CWD- and CWD+ mice from each treatment group. (C) Mg/Cu ratio comparisons between CWD- and CWD+ mice from each treatment group. ppb = parts per billion. * = significantly different from matched CWD- matches. (Student's one-tailed T-test, α ≤ 0.05.)
FIGURE 7.Survival times (DPI-days post inoculation) vs. ICP brain concentrations in CWD+ mice. (A) Mg concentrations low to high, (B) Cu concentrations, low to high (C) and Mg/Cu expressed as a ratio, low to high. The concentrations of Mg, Cu, or the Mg/Cu ratio found in study mouse brains did not appear to vary between survival times.
FIGURE 8.RT-PCR differential gene expression comparing CWD-infected mice from treatment groups D and E to CWD-negative control mice from group E. CWD-inoculated animals given higher Cu (ppm), group E, had a greater number of gene expression alterations (14 > 2-fold) at 60 d post inoculation (DPI), and at terminal disease (15 >2-fold) (A) than group D, which had 7 altered genes at 60 DPI and 13 at terminal disease (B). Although similar in number, the genes altered at terminal disease were different between groups E and D.
Gene alterations >2-fold by comparison group. Table shows gene abbreviation and full name. CWD- = CWD-negative animals, CWD+ = CWD-positive animals
| Compared Groups | Gene | |
|---|---|---|
| a. Group E CWD- vs Group D CWD- | ||
| Cxcl-15 | Chemokine (c-x-c motif) ligand 15 | |
| Infng | Interfuron gamma | |
| IL-1β | Interleukin 1 Beta | |
| IL-16 | Interleukin 16 | |
| IL-17B | Interleukin 17 B | |
| b. Group E CWD- vs Group E CWD+ 60 DPI | ||
| ccl-4 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 | |
| ccl-6 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 6 | |
| ccl-19 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 | |
| ccl-20 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 | |
| Ccr-2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 | |
| Ccr-4 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 4 | |
| Cxcl-5 | Chemokine (c-x-c motif) ligand 5 | |
| Tnfsf-13b | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily member 13b | |
| Fasl | Fas ligand (TNF superfamily member 6) | |
| Bmp-2 | Bone morphogenic protein 2 | |
| Spp1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1, OPN | |
| IL-2rγ | Interleukin 2 receptor gamma | |
| IL-13 | Interleukin 13 | |
| IL-16 | Interleukin 16 | |
| c. Group E CWD- vs Group E CWD+ terminal disease | ||
| ccl-3 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 | |
| ccl-9 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 | |
| ccl-19 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 | |
| Ccr-10 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 10 | |
| Cxcl-15 | Chemokine (c-x-c motif) ligand 15 | |
| Tnfsf-11 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11b- osteoprotegerin | |
| Tnfsf-13 | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily member 13 | |
| Csf-2 | Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage) | |
| OSM | Oncostatin M | |
| Infng | Interfuron gamma | |
| TNF | Tumor necrosis factor α | |
| IL-2rb | Interleukin 2 receptor gamma | |
| IL-11 | Interleukin 11 | |
| IL-13 | Interleukin 13 | |
| IL-16 | Interleukin 16 | |
| d. Group E CWD- vs Group D CWD+ 60 DPI | ||
| ccl-12 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12 | |
| ccl-19 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 | |
| Tnfsf-11 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11b- osteoprotegerin | |
| Spp1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1, OPN | |
| IL-1β | Interleukin 1 Beta | |
| IL-16 | Interleukin 16 | |
| IL-27 | Interleukin 27 | |
| Compared Groups | Gene | |
| e. Group E CWD- vs Group D CWD+ terminal disease | ||
| ccl-3 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 | |
| ccl-9 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 | |
| ccl-19 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 | |
| Tnfsf-11 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11b- osteoprotegerin | |
| Tnfsf-13 | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily member 13 | |
| Fasl | Fas ligand (TNF superfamily member 6) | |
| Bmp-2 | Bone morphogenic protein 2 | |
| Csf-2 | Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage) | |
| Nampt | Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase | |
| IL-5ra | Interleukin 5 receptor alpha | |
| IL-7 | Interleukin 7 | |
| IL-13 | Interleukin 13 | |
| IL-33 | Interleukin 33 | |
| f. Group D CWD- vs Group D CWD+ 60 DPI | ||
| ccl-1 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 1 | |
| Spp1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1, OPN | |
| g. Group D CWD- vs Group D CWD+ terminal disease | ||
| ccl-2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 | |
| ccl-3 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 | |
| ccl-6 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 6 | |
| ccl-9 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 | |
| ccl-12 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12 | |
| Ccr-1 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 | |
| Ccr-6 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 6 | |
| Tnfsf-13b | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily member 13b | |
| OSM | Oncostatin M | |
| TNF | Tumor necrosis factor alpha | |
| IL-5rα | Interleukin 5 receptor alpha | |
| IL-13 | Interleukin 13 | |
| IL-33 | Interleukin 33 |
FIGURE 9.RT-PCR differential gene expression comparing CWD-infected group D time points to the CWD-negative controls from group D. At 60 DPI, mice showed little differentiation from control animals (A). At terminal disease there was an increase in gene alterations with 13 exhibiting > 2-fold change (B). (20X magnification.)
FIGURE 10.GFAP staining in the hippocampus of groups E (left column) and D (right column) at 60 d post inoculation (DPI) and at terminal disease in CWD negative (−) and positive (+) TG12 mice (4X magnification).
Number of mice for each group utilized in the inflammatory RT-PCR array and protein expression assay. With chronic wasting disease (+) and without (−). DPI- days post inoculation
| Test Group and CWD Status | Number of mice |
|---|---|
| D. CWD- controls | 6 |
| D. CWD + DPI 60 | 3 |
| D. CWD + Terminal disease | 2 |
| E. CWD- controls | 4 |
| E. CWD + DPI 60 | 4 |
| E. CWD+ Terminal disease | 4 |
| Test Group | Mg/Cu Ratio | [Mg] ppb | [Cu] ppb | Mean survival DPI and CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Custom | 26 | 1,000,000 | 38,340 | 125 (113–134) | |
| B. Custom | 9 | 350,000 | 38,340 | 126 (119–137) | |
| C. Custom | 167 | 1,000,000 | 6,000 | 128 (124–135) | |
| D. Custom | 500 | 1,000,000 | 2,000 | 136 (130–148) | |
| E. 5001 | 162 | 2,100,000 | 13,000 | 133 (127–136) | |
| Treatment Group survival times compared | |||||
| D vs. A | 0.03* | ||||
| D vs. B | 0.10 | ||||
| D vs. C | 0.04* | ||||
| D vs. E | 0.07 | ||||
| A vs. B | 0.71 | ||||
| A vs. C | 0.03* | ||||
| A vs. E | 0.24 | ||||
| B vs. C | 0.76 | ||||
| B vs. E | 0.51 | ||||
| C vs. E | 0.76 | ||||
Dietary constituent values in parts per billion (ppb) for the custom and 5001 diets
| Constituent | Custom Diet-ppb | 5001 Diet-ppb |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 177,000,000 | 285,000,000 |
| Fat | 52,000,000 | 135,000,000 |
| Potassium | 9,520,000 | 11,800,000 |
| Magnesium | 0 | 2,100,000 |
| Iron | 210,000 | 270,000 |
| Zinc | 57,800 | 79,000 |
| Manganese | 122,000 | 70,000 |
| Copper | 500 | 13,000 |
| Selenium | 400 | 300 |
Magnesium (Mg) and Copper (Cu) levels and number of mice per treatment group with (+) and without (−) chronic wasting disease. ppb- parts per billion, Custom-Teklad Mg/Cu deficient diet and supplemented drinking water 5001-standard Purina rodent chow and regular drinking water
| Test Group | [Mg] ppb | [Cu] ppb | Mg/Cu Ratio | Number of mice CWD + | Number of mice CWD − |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Custom | 1,000,000 | 38,340 | 26 | 9 | 9 |
| B. Custom | 350,000 | 38,340 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| C. Custom | 1,000,000 | 6,000 | 167 | 12 | 6 |
| D. Custom | 1,000,000 | 2,000 | 500 | 9 | 8 |
| E. 5001. | 2,100,000 | 13,000 | 162 | 9 | 6 |