| Literature DB >> 34912932 |
Vincent Edward Butcon1, Eddieson Pasay-An1, Maria Charito Laarni Indonto1, Liza Villacorte1, Jupiter Cajigal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to use the artificial neural network as a novel approach to explore factors that determine and predict successful performance of nursing interns in Saudi Arabia on the Saudi Nursing Licensure Examination (SNLE).Entities:
Keywords: Determinants; examination; neural network analysis; nursing; nursing licensure; success
Year: 2021 PMID: 34912932 PMCID: PMC8641714 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_652_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Nurse intern characteristics
| Characteristics ( | |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| 21-30 | 45 (72.58) |
| 31-40 | 15 (24.19) |
| Over 40 | 2 (3.23) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 25 (40.32) |
| Female | 37 (59.68) |
| Marital status | |
| Unmarried | 38 (61.29) |
| Married | 24 (38.71) |
| Academic program | |
| Regular | 41 (66.13) |
| Bridging | 21 (33.87) |
| GPA (mean±SD: 2.58±0.741) | |
| Low (<2.000) | 15 (24.19) |
| High (≥2.000) | 47 (75.81) |
| Study hours (mean±SD: 17.06±4.420) | |
| Low (<15.00) | 5 (8.06) |
| High (≥15.00) | 57 (91.94) |
| Total items score (mean±SD: 70.97±9.609) | |
| Low (18-45) | 2 (3.23) |
| High (46-90) | 60 (96.77) |
GPA=Grade point average, SD=Standard deviation
Perceived examination determinants of the nurse interns
| Item number | Items | Mean±SD | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | School factors | 4.02±0.13 | Agree |
| 1 | The review program is comprehensive and covered all subjects | 4.02±0.90 | Agree |
| 2 | The nursing faculties are specialists in their fields | 4.23±0.82 | Agree |
| 3 | The university encourages students to attend the review classes | 3.89±0.98 | Undecided |
| 4 | The review program enhances the test-taking skills of the students | 4.06±0.67 | Agree |
| 5 | The course program is patterned on the licensure examination framework | 3.89±0.89 | Undecided |
| 6 | The questions in the review class are structured on the licensure exam | 4.03±0.85 | Agree |
| B | Candidate factors | 3.81±0.26 | Undecided |
| 7 | I spent adequate time studying for the examination | 4.10±0.86 | Agree |
| 8 | I balanced my review time with my other tasks and social obligations (e.g., family, friends) | 3.68±1.25 | Undecided |
| 9 | I ate nutritious food and had a balanced diet while reviewing | 3.73±1.19 | Undecided |
| 10 | I engaged in stress management activities (e.g., exercise) | 3.45±1.13 | Undecided |
| 11 | I engaged in group review | 3.79±0.85 | Undecided |
| 12 | I did self-study modules in my free time | 4.11±0.79 | Agree |
| C | Exam factors | 4.00±0.13 | Agree |
| 13 | The examination questions were clear and easy to understand | 4.19±0.83 | Agree |
| 14 | The examination questions covered all topics in all nursing concepts | 3.94±0.83 | Undecided |
| 15 | The examination questions allowed me to think critically | 3.94±0.79 | Undecided |
| 16 | The examination questions were applicable to what I learned in the university | 4.02±0.82 | Agree |
| 17 | The time allocated for the entire examination was adequate | 4.08±0.91 | Agree |
| 18 | The examination questions focused on applied rather than theoretical knowledge | 3.84±0.89 | Undecided |
| Overall | 3.94±0.14 | Undecided |
SD=Standard deviation
Independent variable importance to examination determinants score in a two-layer neural networks (perceptron/regression) model
| Factors/covariates* | Importance | Normalized importance (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.160 | 45.7 |
| Gender | 0.053 | 15.2 |
| Marital status | 0.075 | 21.3 |
| Academic program | 0.021 | 5.9 |
| GPA* | 0.340 | 96.9* |
| Study hours* | 0.351 | 100* |
GPA=Grade point average . *Sig. at 90%
Figure 1Two-layer neural network model diagram