| Literature DB >> 34912113 |
Paul J Blanchfield1,2,3, John W M Rudd4,5, Lee E Hrenchuk4,6, Marc Amyot7, Christopher L Babiarz8, Ken G Beaty4, R A Drew Bodaly4, Brian A Branfireun9, Cynthia C Gilmour10, Jennifer A Graydon11, Britt D Hall12, Reed C Harris13, Andrew Heyes14, Holger Hintelmann15, James P Hurley16, Carol A Kelly4,5, David P Krabbenhoft17, Steve E Lindberg18, Robert P Mason19, Michael J Paterson4,6, Cheryl L Podemski4, Ken A Sandilands4,6, George R Southworth18, Vincent L St Louis11, Lori S Tate4,20, Michael T Tate17.
Abstract
Anthropogenic releases of mercury (Hg)1-3 are a human health issue4 because the potent toxicant methylmercury (MeHg), formed primarily by microbial methylation of inorganic Hg in aquatic ecosystems, bioaccumulates to high concentrations in fish consumed by humans5,6. Predicting the efficacy of Hg pollution controls on fish MeHg concentrations is complex because many factors influence the production and bioaccumulation of MeHg7-9. Here we conducted a 15-year whole-ecosystem, single-factor experiment to determine the magnitude and timing of reductions in fish MeHg concentrations following reductions in Hg additions to a boreal lake and its watershed. During the seven-year addition phase, we applied enriched Hg isotopes to increase local Hg wet deposition rates fivefold. The Hg isotopes became increasingly incorporated into the food web as MeHg, predominantly from additions to the lake because most of those in the watershed remained there. Thereafter, isotopic additions were stopped, resulting in an approximately 100% reduction in Hg loading to the lake. The concentration of labelled MeHg quickly decreased by up to 91% in lower trophic level organisms, initiating rapid decreases of 38-76% of MeHg concentration in large-bodied fish populations in eight years. Although Hg loading from watersheds may not decline in step with lowering deposition rates, this experiment clearly demonstrates that any reduction in Hg loadings to lakes, whether from direct deposition or runoff, will have immediate benefits to fish consumers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34912113 PMCID: PMC8732272 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04222-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962
Fig. 1Temporal dynamics of mercury addition and recovery in the Lake 658 ecosystem.
a, Location (inset) of the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), Canada, where Hg enriched with different isotopes was applied to the wetland, upland and lake surface of Lake 658 to simulate enhanced wet deposition of Hg (dark blue shaded area). b, Inorganic Hg added to the lake was methylated and measured as MeHg concentration in water (in ng l−1; n = 516), sediments (in ng g−1 dry weight; n = 1,627) and invertebrates (in ng g−1 wet weight; n = 211), and as total Hg in fishes (in ng g−1 wet weight; n = 1,052). Mean annual concentrations for the open-water season are shown for all lake components except for fish populations, which were collected each autumn. Concentration data for large-bodied fish are derived from body-length standardization (pike, 475 mm; whitefish, 535 mm). c, Hg loading to the lake increased MeHg concentrations (per cent increase = [lake spike MeHg]/[ambient MeHg] × 100) during the addition phase (2001–2007), then decreased during the recovery phase (2008–2015), when experimental Hg additions to the ecosystem ceased (light blue shaded area in a). Dotted lines indicate missing data.
Source data.
Extended Data Fig. 1Temporal dynamics of upland mercury in fish.
Isotopic 198Hg added to the upland area of Lake 658 was above the detection limit (0.5% of ambient MeHg; dashed line) in all fish species, but contributed little (<2%) to overall MeHg concentrations (percent increase = [upland spike MeHg]/[ambient MeHg] × 100). Mean annual MeHg concentration data for each species or age-class is presented and based on fish collected during fall population sampling (n = 1,052; sample size details in Extended Data Tables 2 and 3); dotted lines indicate missing data
.
Fish mercury concentrations in the experimental and reference lakes over time
Fish mercury concentrations in the experimental and reference lakes over time
Footnote: Linear regression statistics [F = y0 + (a × x)] of the change in annual mean (yellow perch, blacknose shiner) or body-size standardized (northern pike, lake whitefish) concentrations (ng g−1 w.w.) of ambient and lake spike MeHg (measured as THg) in fish muscle tissue during the addition phase or entire study. Isotopic Hg additions were made to Lake 658 from 2001–2007; Lake 240 is a reference lake. Fish collections occurred each autumn.
*lake spike below detection in 2001 (pike: n = 32; whitefish: n = 7 of 9); regression from 2002–2007
Fig. 2Accumulation and trophic transfer of lake spike and ambient mercury.
a–c, Annual fish muscle MeHg concentrations (total MeHg = lake spike MeHg + ambient MeHg; grey circles) increased above background concentrations (ambient MeHg; white circles) during the addition phase (dark blue shaded area) from uptake of isotope enriched Hg added to Lake 658 (lake spike; black circles) for planktivorous (age 1+ yellow perch; n = 140) (a), piscivorous (northern pike; n = 442) (b) and benthivorous (lake whitefish; n = 189) (c) populations, then declined during the recovery phase (light blue shaded area). d–f, Biomagnification factors (BMF = [MeHgpredator]/[MeHgprey]) of lake spike MeHg and ambient MeHg from dominant prey items for each of these fish species were as follows: zooplankton (n = 127) to yellow perch (d); forage fish (n = 421) to northern pike (e); and Chaoborus (n = 62) to lake whitefish (f). Fish data are means from autumn sampling (sample sizes in Extended Data Tables 2, 3). Concentration data for pike and whitefish are derived from body-length standardization; dotted lines indicate missing data.
Source data.
Annual fish metrics and mercury concentrations during the addition phase
Annual fish metrics and mercury concentrations during the addition phase
Footnote: Data presented are mean (± s.e.m.) of n fish measured and their muscle tissue analysed for ambient and lake spike MeHg concentrations (ng g−1 w.w., measured as THg), except for northern pike and lake whitefish where concentration data were standardized by fish length (range in parentheses). Percent lake spike THg = [lake spike THg]/[ambient THg] × 100. Isotopic Hg additions were made to Lake 658 from 2001–2007; Lake 240 is a reference lake. Fish collections occurred each autumn.
nd = not detected (detection limit for lake spike is 0.5% of ambient THg).
*Standardized by fish length (pike: 475 mm; whitefish: 535 mm).
†Two fish above detection limit.
‡Standardized with linear regression instead of polynomial.
Annual fish metrics and mercury concentrations during the recovery phase
Annual fish metrics and mercury concentrations during the recovery phase
Footnote: Data presented are mean (± s.e.m.) of n fish measured and their muscle tissue analysed for ambient and lake spike MeHg concentrations (ng g−1 w.w., measured as THg), except for northern pike and lake whitefish where concentration data were standardized by fish length (range in parentheses). Percent lake spike THg = [lake spike THg]/[ambient THg] × 100. Isotopic Hg additions were made to Lake 658 from 2001–2007; Lake 240 is a reference lake. Fish collections occurred each autumn.
*Year class failure.
†Standardized by fish length (pike: 475 mm; whitefish: 535 mm).
Fig. 3Recovery of the apex predator from mercury loading.
Comparison of changes in body burdens of lake spike MeHg during the recovery phase for the northern pike population (annual mean, black circles) to that of individual northern pike (grey lines and triangles). Individual northern pike were sampled at the end of the addition phase (in 2007; n = 16) and subsequently recaptured during the recovery phase (each line represents an individual fish). Population data are based on all fish captured each autumn (n = 280). All northern pike were sampled using a non-lethal biopsy (represented in images) in the autumn of each year and returned to the lake. Fish body burdens of lake spike MeHg (body burden = lake spike MeHg (ng g−1) × fish mass (g)) were normalized to concentrations in the autumn of 2007 (t0; the final time isotope-enriched Hg was added to Lake 658 and the beginning of the recovery period). Exponential decay regression starting in the second year of recovery estimated a 50% reduction in lake spike MeHg burden in the population in 4.2 years (data are mean (black circle) ± 95% confidence interval (shaded band); line fit: y = 1.7439 × e−0.2928, R2 = 0.95, F1,6 = 95.5, P = 0.0002).
Source data.
Extended Data Fig. 2Comparison of individual and population body sizes of northern pike.
Mean (± s.e.m.) body size of all northern pike sampled in the fall of each year (population, black circles; n = 442) for muscle MeHg concentration using a biopsy method was stable over time. Individual northern pike (grey triangles) captured in 2007 and again in at least one subsequent year (n = 16 fish with 1–9 individuals recaptured each year 2008–2015) were used to determine individual losses of lake spike MeHg during recovery (see Fig. 3). These individual fish, which were also captured prior to 2007, showed an increase in body size over time (linear regression: y = 17.43x−34470.0, R = 0.55, F = 61.1, P < 0.0001)
.