Literature DB >> 19391686

Application of ecosystem-scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition.

Christopher D Knightes1, Elsie M Sunderland, M Craig Barber, John M Johnston, Robert B Ambrose.   

Abstract

Management strategies for controlling anthropogenic mercury emissions require understanding how ecosystems will respond to changes in atmospheric mercury deposition. Process-based mathematical models are valuable tools for informing such decisions, because measurement data often are sparse and cannot be extrapolated to investigate the environmental impacts of different policy options. Here, we bring together previously developed and evaluated modeling frameworks for watersheds, water bodies, and food web bioaccumulation of mercury. We use these models to investigate the timescales required for mercury levels in predatory fish to change in response to altered mercury inputs. We model declines in water, sediment, and fish mercury concentrations across five ecosystems spanning a range of physical and biological conditions, including a farm pond, a seepage lake, a stratified lake, a drainage lake, and a coastal plain river. Results illustrate that temporal lags are longest for watershed-dominated systems (like the coastal plain river) and shortest for shallow water bodies (like the seepage lake) that receive most of their mercury from deposition directly to the water surface. All ecosystems showed responses in two phases: A relatively rapid initial decline in mercury concentrations (20-60% of steady-state values) over one to three decades, followed by a slower descent lasting for decades to centuries. Response times are variable across ecosystem types and are highly affected by sediment burial rates and active layer depths in systems not dominated by watershed inputs. Additional research concerning watershed processes driving mercury dynamics and empirical data regarding sediment dynamics in freshwater bodies are critical for improving the predictive capability of process-based mercury models used to inform regulatory decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19391686     DOI: 10.1897/08-242R.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  18 in total

Review 1.  Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption.

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey; Elsie M Sunderland; Hing Man Chan; Anna L Choi; Philippe Grandjean; Koenraad Mariën; Emily Oken; Mineshi Sakamoto; Rita Schoeny; Pál Weihe; Chong-Huai Yan; Akira Yasutake
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services.

Authors:  Randall Jf Bruins; Timothy J Canfield; Clifford Duke; Larry Kapustka; Amanda M Nahlik; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Assessing exposure risks for freshwater tilapia species posed by mercury and methylmercury.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Cheng; Yi-Jun Lin; Shu-Han You; Ying-Fei Yang; Chun Ming How; Yi-Ting Tseng; Wei-Yu Chen; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  An Integrated Ecological Modeling System for Assessing Impacts of Multiple Stressors on Stream and Riverine Ecosystem Services within River Basins.

Authors:  John M Johnston; M Craig Barber; Kurt Wolfe; Mike Galvin; Mike Cyterski; Rajbir Parmar
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Developing and applying metamodels of high resolution process-based simulations for high throughput exposure assessment of organic chemicals in riverine ecosystems.

Authors:  M Craig Barber; Kristin K Isaacs; Caroline Tebes-Stevens
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination.

Authors:  David T Mayack
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Authors:  Amanda Giang; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CONNECTIVITY OF STREAMS AND RIPARIAN WETLANDS TO DOWNSTREAM WATERS: A SYNTHESIS.

Authors:  Ken M Fritz; Kate A Schofield; Laurie C Alexander; Michael G McManus; Heather E Golden; Charles R Lane; William G Kepner; Stephen D LeDuc; Julie E DeMeester; Amina I Pollard
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2018-04

9.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy.

Authors:  Noelle E Selin; Elsie M Sunderland; Christopher D Knightes; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.