Carles Serrat1. 1. Department of Physics, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa (Barcelona), Spain.
Abstract
We use real-time time-dependent density functional theory simulations to numerically demonstrate that resonantly enhanced difference-frequency generation (re-DFG) involving intense ultrashort coherent X-ray pulses can selectively excite core states of atoms in molecules. As a model case, we evaluate the spectral selectivity of re-DFG excitation of the oxygen K-edge by illumination of a single gas-phase water molecule with two-color X-ray pulses of different photon energies and durations. The re-DFG excitation is further probed by a small delayed pulse with central photon energy resonant with the oxygen K-edge peak absorption line. Based on these results, we anticipate that highly selective excitation by re-DFG X-ray nonlinear processes might be achieved in more complex molecular systems and bulk materials by using highly penetrating two-color hard X-ray pulses, with extensive applications.
We use real-time time-dependent density functional theory simulations to numerically demonstrate that resonantly enhanced difference-frequency generation (re-DFG) involving intense ultrashort coherent X-ray pulses can selectively excite core states of atoms in molecules. As a model case, we evaluate the spectral selectivity of re-DFG excitation of the oxygen K-edge by illumination of a single gas-phase water molecule with two-color X-ray pulses of different photon energies and durations. The re-DFG excitation is further probed by a small delayed pulse with central photon energy resonant with the oxygen K-edge peak absorption line. Based on these results, we anticipate that highly selective excitation by re-DFG X-ray nonlinear processes might be achieved in more complex molecular systems and bulk materials by using highly penetrating two-color hard X-ray pulses, with extensive applications.
Selective photodissociation of molecules
by resonant excitation
near a chosen core ionization edge by means of nonlinear interactions
in the X-ray range is becoming conceivable due to recent advances
in the development of intense ultrashort X-ray coherent pulse sources,
such as synchrotron, free-electron lasers (FELs), and in high-harmonic
generation.[1−10]Several nonlinear interactions in the X-ray range are accordingly
being investigated.[11] In a previous work,[12] we showed how the phase-sensitivity cancellation
of the anti-Stokes component previously described in two- and three-level
systems in the infrared and optical regions can be extended to the
X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption
fine structure (EXAFS)[6] of chemical species
by highly localized four-wave-mixing (FWM) nonlinear processes. Femtosecond
transient FWM grating spectroscopy with ultrafast X-rays has recently
been demonstrated,[13,14] showing experimentally how the
large penetration depth of X-rays allows probing the bulk properties
of materials, addressing core excited states, and creating excitation
gratings with unprecedented nanoscale spatial resolution. Among the
X-ray wave-mixing processes, difference-frequency generation (DFG)
of optical and UV radiation using two-color (Ω1,
Ω2) X-ray laser pulses, where ℏΩ is the central photon energy of the pulses,
has been studied theoretically.[15,16] We note here that atomic
units and hence ℏ = 1 are used in the rest of the paper.Here we address atomic core resonantly enhanced difference-frequency
generation (re-DFG) from X-ray pulses, considering the oxygen K-edge
in a single gas-phase water molecule as a model system. We numerically
show how the illumination of a water molecule with two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) femtosecond X-ray pulses produces a difference-frequency
component Ω that is enhanced at the core resonance Ω =
ω0, with ω0 being in this case the
oxygen K-edge in the gas-phase water molecule, and evaluate the degree
of excitation selectivity as a function of the duration of the two-color
pulses.
Numerical Simulations
The first step is to calculate
the absorption spectrum of the molecule
around the target absorption edge. Figure shows the computed water linear spectrum
considering different field polarizations, together with the absorption
spectrum obtained by adding the different polarization contributions.
The simulations have been performed using the NWChem real-time TDDFT
module.[17] A delta-function electric field
perturbation applied at t = dt,
with dt = 0.045 au, excites all electronic modes
of the system aswhere κ is the kick strength and d̂ is the unit polarization vector in Cartesian coordinates.
The complex molecular polarizability components α̃(ω) in the x, y, and z directions are obtained from the
Fourier transform of the dipole moments μ(t), which are computed separately, divided
by the Fourier transform of the corresponding electric field component Eδ(t) aswith i = x, y, z. The absorption spectrum S1(ω) is then calculated with the mean
of the imaginary part of the polarizability components as
Figure 1
Oxygen K-edge
linear absorption lines obtained from the imaginary
part of the Fourier transform of the time-dependent dipole moments,
after the system has been excited with a small electric field kick
of 10–4 au ≈ 51 mV/nm at t > 0. The peaks have been broadened to account for core relaxation
effects by damping the dipole time signal by e–, with td = 20 au ≈ 480 as. The absorption obtained with
different linear field polarizations together with the mean in the
three directions is shown.
Oxygen K-edge
linear absorption lines obtained from the imaginary
part of the Fourier transform of the time-dependent dipole moments,
after the system has been excited with a small electric field kick
of 10–4 au ≈ 51 mV/nm at t > 0. The peaks have been broadened to account for core relaxation
effects by damping the dipole time signal by e–, with td = 20 au ≈ 480 as. The absorption obtained with
different linear field polarizations together with the mean in the
three directions is shown.It is intricate to determine the convenient choice of exchange-correlation
functionals and basis sets to describe the absolute positions, number
of spectral peaks, and relative strengths of a particular system.
An extensive study of the gas-phase water molecule was performed in
ref (18), where the
B3LYP functional together with Sapporo basis sets gave the best overall
agreement with experimental results. In Figure 2 of ref (18), a comparison between
the theoretical and experimental results for the absorption spectrum
of the gas-phase water molecule around the oxygen K-edge can be examined.
After testing several exchange-correlation functionals and basis sets,
in the present work, we have chosen the Gaussian basis set aug-cc-pVTZ
for the nuclear geometry optimization in the y–z plane together with the exchange-correlation functional
PBE0, and instead the relatively small 6-31G basis set with PBE0 for
the real-time TDDFT. The absorption spectrum around the oxygen K-edge
that we obtain coincides reasonably well with the experiments.[18,19] The calculated oxygen K-edge main absorption peak is neat at 543
eV, which differs by 7 eV from the experimental value, and the near-edge
features agree in number and relative strengths although they span
a larger frequency domain. We hence resolve that the theory level
that we use is sufficiently accurate and most computationally efficient
for the real-time TDDFT description of the fundamental physics of
the re-DFG process that we address, which is based on the resonance
at the main oxygen K-edge spectral peak.In order to examine
the re-DFG nonlinear effect, the water molecule
is illuminated with two-color (3Ω, 4Ω) laser pulses and
the resulting DFG component is evaluated by varying Ω. The two-color
pulses are linearly polarized in the x, y, and z directions, with all polarizations in phase
with each other, so that the resulting polarization is not aligned
with any of the molecular axis. The two-color field components in
each direction have the formwhere E0 is the
peak amplitude of the two-color pulse components, τ gives the
duration of the pulses, which in the present simulations are 1.67,
2.56, and 3.43 fs (fwhm), 3Ω and 4Ω are the respective
central angular frequencies, and t0 centers
the pulses in the temporal grid. An important matter with respect
to the potential applications of the re-DFG effect that we discuss
is the balance between the peak intensity needed for the nonlinear
effect to occur and the maximum peak intensity for extended molecular
damage. A laser peak intensity of 1012 W/cm2 has been chosen in the present simulations as an example to be about
the order of magnitude for harmless doses in different tissues and
materials as reported in ref (20) and as will be further commented below. Additionally, in Figure , a study of the
variation of the re-DFG signal as a function of the laser pulse peak
intensities and their photon energies is shown.
Figure 4
(a) Log–log plot showing the quadratic dependence
of the
re-DFG integrated signal on the peak intensity of the laser pulses,
in the case of 3.43 fs two-color (3ω0, 4ω0) pulses (ω0 = 543 eV). (b) Dependence of
the re-DFG integrated signal on the photon energy input pulses as
(nω0, (n + 1)ω0), in the case of 3.43 fs pulses with 1012 W/cm2 peak intensity.
The power spectra
shown in Figure have
been obtained by computing the Fourier transform
of the acceleration of the expectation value of the time-dependent
dipole d(t) = μ̈(t) resulting from the interaction of the two-color pulses
with the system as[21]A Hann-type time window of the form is applied before the Fourier transform,
where tT is the total time of the simulation. Figure shows the spectral
signal D(ω) obtained for three different central
photon energy values of the incident two-color pulses that produce
a DFG component very close to the calculated oxygen K-edge. The inset
shows how the signal peaks at the oxygen K-edge, which is the demonstration
that the DFG signal is enhanced by the core oxygen K-edge resonance
(ω0 = 543 eV). Other frequency mixing effects can
also be seen in Figure at larger spectral values, corresponding to the second harmonic
of the 3Ω field (6Ω) and the sum-frequency generation
3Ω + 4Ω signal (7Ω). The central photon energy of
the input two-color pulses (3Ω, 4Ω) has been scanned by
varying Ω to give DGF signals from about 535 to 550 eV, and
the resulting spectrally integrated DFG signal is plotted in Figure for three different
durations of the two-color input pulses, as indicated. The integration
of the power spectra has been considered in the region around the
oxygen K-edge, spanning the frequency range between 500 and 600 eV.
Here we can clearly see the peak of the integrated DFG signal at the
oxygen K-edge (543 eV), which, as can be expected, it is narrower
as the duration of the incident pulses is increased. The integrated
DFG values in Figure have been normalized for clarity. It is worth noting that, in order
to optimize the computational requirements of our rt-TDDFT simulations,
the durations of the pulses that we have considered are remarkably
short (1.67, 2.56, and 3.43 fs), and therefore, much narrower peaks
in Figure can be
expected by considering longer incident pulses, which would consequently
result in a more selective re-DFG effect. Markedly, they can be most
regularly produced in X-ray FEL experiments.
Figure 2
Power spectra D(ω) obtained by Fourier transform
of the acceleration of the time-dependent dipole resulting from the
interaction of the two-color (3Ω, 4Ω) pulses with the
water molecule, for three different values of Ω. The inset is
a zoom of the spectra near the oxygen K-edge showing the enhancement
of the DFG signal at resonance (Ω = ω0 = 543
eV).
Figure 3
Integrated DFG spectral signal around the oxygen
K-edge as a function
of the incident photon energy (Ω) of the two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) pulses.
Power spectra D(ω) obtained by Fourier transform
of the acceleration of the time-dependent dipole resulting from the
interaction of the two-color (3Ω, 4Ω) pulses with the
water molecule, for three different values of Ω. The inset is
a zoom of the spectra near the oxygen K-edge showing the enhancement
of the DFG signal at resonance (Ω = ω0 = 543
eV).Integrated DFG spectral signal around the oxygen
K-edge as a function
of the incident photon energy (Ω) of the two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) pulses.After the two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) laser pulse interacts
with the water molecule, the system remains core excited due to re-DFG
when Ω = ω0 = 543 eV, since no relaxation processes
are considered in the simulations. We observe how the differences
between the excited and ground state charge densities[18] follow complicated dynamics around the oxygen atom, with
a periodicity that corresponds to the calculated oxygen K-edge, therefore
demonstrating 1s core excitation (not shown).Figure shows the dependence of the re-DFG integrated signal
on the peak intensity of the laser pulses, in the case of two-color
(3ω0, 4ω0) pulses (Figure a), together with the variation
of the re-DFG integrated signal as a function of the photon energy
input two-color pulses as (nω0,
(n + 1)ω0), with 1012 W/cm2 peak intensity (Figure b), and for 3.43 fs pulses in both cases.
In the log–log plot of Figure a, we can observe how the intensity of the re-DFG signal
increases as the square of the intensity of the input laser pulse,
as is expected from a second-order nonlinear polarization. Figure b gives the computed
decay of the re-DFG integrated signal as the photon energy of the
two-color pulses is considered further away from the oxygen K-edge
resonance, with a dependence on n of approximately
(n2 + n)−4, as can be determined from the second order nonlinear susceptibility,
although the precise values will count on the decay rate of the dipole.[22](a) Log–log plot showing the quadratic dependence
of the
re-DFG integrated signal on the peak intensity of the laser pulses,
in the case of 3.43 fs two-color (3ω0, 4ω0) pulses (ω0 = 543 eV). (b) Dependence of
the re-DFG integrated signal on the photon energy input pulses as
(nω0, (n + 1)ω0), in the case of 3.43 fs pulses with 1012 W/cm2 peak intensity.In order to evaluate
in an all-laser-field approach the degree
of excitation of the oxygen after the interaction with the two-color
(3Ω, 4Ω) pulse, we add a cos2 envelope probe
pulse of 0.8 fs (fwhm) duration and 104 W/cm2 peak intensity, with the central photon energy of the calculated
oxygen K-edge (ω0 = 543 eV). The probe is delayed
240 as from the end of the input two-color pulse. The absorption spectrum Sp(ω) of the probe pulse in the medium
is computed in the frame of transient absorption signals, as described
in ref (23)where Ẽp(ω) is the complex spectrum of the probe pulse and μ̃(ω)
is the Fourier transform of the time-dependent dipole, considered
in the complete pump–probe time window of the calculation.
The total probe absorption signal is then obtained by integration
of Sp(ω)Negative (positive) values
of Sp(ω) or S2 correspond to absorption (emission) of light. The absorption
cross section S2 multiplied by the number
density of atoms results in the absorption/gain coefficient. The computed
probe absorption around the oxygen K-edge as a function of the central
photon energy of the input two-color pulses (3Ω, 4Ω) is
shown in Figure .
We observe clear oscillations of the absorption rate around the oxygen
K-edge, which provide the evidence that the atom is excited about
543 eV. Also clear in Figure is the spectral width of the excitation, which is set by
the duration of the input pulses, as commented above. The period of
the oscillations of the probe absorption in Figure corresponds to the Fourier limited bandwidth
of the input pulses, which is roughly 1.6 eV for the 1.67 fs pulses,
1.1 eV for the 2.55 fs pulses, and 0.8 eV for the 3.43 fs pulses,
and it is a consequence of the periodic convolution between the probe
field and the nonlinearly DFG generated time-dependent dipole moment,
which modulates their time delay as Ω is varied and therefore
also the probe absorption rate.[23]
Figure 5
Probe absorption
(S2) as a function
of the incident photon energy (Ω) of the two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) pulses. The curves have been slightly shifted vertically
as indicated for a better visualization of the oscillation width.
Probe absorption
(S2) as a function
of the incident photon energy (Ω) of the two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) pulses. The curves have been slightly shifted vertically
as indicated for a better visualization of the oscillation width.
Discussion and Conclusions
In conclusion,
we have numerically shown that two-color (3Ω,
4Ω) re-DFG can be implemented using synchronized femtosecond
X-ray pulses for the selective excitation of atomic core states, considering
a single gas-phase water molecule as a model system. The duration
of the two-color pulses determines the spectral selectivity that can
be achieved by the nonlinear re-DFG effect. We have shown how the
re-DFG integrated signal increases as the laser peak intensities increase
and decreases as the photon energy of the two-color pulses is increased.
It is deserving to comment that rt-TDDFT has shown a fail in describing
resonant excitations at relatively high intensities (1011–1012 W/cm2).[24] This is certainly not the case of the generated re-DFG signal in
our study, which is several orders of magnitude less intense than
the input pulses, always in the linear regime, and therefore, the
time-dependent dipole resulting from its resonant core interaction
with the atom is accurately described.[18,25] It is also
worth noting that our simulations build upon the dipole approximation,
so that some corrections due to non-dipole effects are expected at
the high photon energies that we consider, to which extent would demand
further theoretical and experimental studies.[26]The results that we have described might be extended to other
molecules,
essentially considering that the interaction of coherent X-ray FEL
pulses is locally produced at the site specific atoms rather than
the whole molecule. Since DFG is a second-order nonlinear effect,
some symmetry-breaking is expected and would not be produced, for
instance, in rare gas atoms. The effect in solids and other more complex
molecules needs to be investigated separately and using the appropriate
level of theory in each case. In this regard, it is well-known that
resonant excitation near a core atomic ionization edge in a molecule
can follow a rapid redistribution of charge beginning in less than
a femtoseconds via Auger processes, so that multiple charged molecular
ions can be formed and the molecule generally will become unstable
and dissociate.[27] From this perspective,
considering that a spectral fingerprint of the particular state of
a molecule can generally be obtained by its XANES/EXAFS linear absorption
spectra at the different atomic absorption edges, the selectivity
of the re-DFG process that we outline could further be optimized using
a combination of several synchronized two-color (Ω1, Ω2) pulses, which can produce re-DFG signals resonant
with several XANES/EXAFS absorption lines simultaneously, resulting
in additional selective local excitation of the molecule.Beyond
the fundamental and applied interest of the nonlinear re-DFG
X-ray matter interaction process that we have presented in a single
gas-phase water molecule, our motivation also anticipates the potential
of extending it to higher photon energies following the rapid advances
in FEL sources, such as considering two-color hard X-rays to core
excite higher atomic number atoms by re-DFG. The essential part of
this hard X-ray approach is that the two-color (Ω1, Ω2) pulses can be highly penetrating in bulk,
while the core resonant re-DFG signals Ω2 –
Ω1 are not. Therefore, by virtue of the results from
the water model that have been shown, we may consider re-DFG to be
achieved in the atomic edges of, e.g., biomolecular zinc complexes[28] (Zn K-edge ∼10 keV), using two-color
(Ω1, Ω2) pulses of highly penetrating
Ω1 and Ω2 hard X-ray central photon
energies. Consistently, it was recently reported that exposure to
laser-produced hard X-ray pulses with relatively high peak intensities
does not lead to increased harm to mammalian cells exposed in vitro
compared with the harm induced from exposure to hard X-rays from conventional
medical sources, concluding that the use of high-power laser facilities
for medical imaging is justified.[20] In
this regard, the optimal two-color pulse photon energies, peak intensities,
and durations to attain a harmless dose in different tissues and materials
using hard X-ray re-DFG need to be addressed by additional molecular
dynamics studies together with experimental measurements. We can hence
envisage extensive potential applications of the nonlinear X-ray re-DFG
effect that we describe, which include, in general, the local and
selective manipulation of atoms and molecules in bulk matter, and,
in particular, in medicine, it might be significant for local and
selective cancellation of the active center of biomolecules.[28−30]
Authors: Martinus C Feiters; Astrid P A M Eijkelenboom; Hans Friedrich Nolting; Bernt Krebs; Fusinita M I van den Ent; Ronald H A Plasterk; Robert Kaptein; Rolf Boelens Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat Date: 2002-12-24 Impact factor: 2.616
Authors: C Tillman; G Grafström; A C Jonsson; B A Jönsson; I Mercer; S Mattsson; S E Strand; S Svanberg Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: E Aprà; E J Bylaska; W A de Jong; N Govind; K Kowalski; T P Straatsma; M Valiev; H J J van Dam; Y Alexeev; J Anchell; V Anisimov; F W Aquino; R Atta-Fynn; J Autschbach; N P Bauman; J C Becca; D E Bernholdt; K Bhaskaran-Nair; S Bogatko; P Borowski; J Boschen; J Brabec; A Bruner; E Cauët; Y Chen; G N Chuev; C J Cramer; J Daily; M J O Deegan; T H Dunning; M Dupuis; K G Dyall; G I Fann; S A Fischer; A Fonari; H Früchtl; L Gagliardi; J Garza; N Gawande; S Ghosh; K Glaesemann; A W Götz; J Hammond; V Helms; E D Hermes; K Hirao; S Hirata; M Jacquelin; L Jensen; B G Johnson; H Jónsson; R A Kendall; M Klemm; R Kobayashi; V Konkov; S Krishnamoorthy; M Krishnan; Z Lin; R D Lins; R J Littlefield; A J Logsdail; K Lopata; W Ma; A V Marenich; J Martin Del Campo; D Mejia-Rodriguez; J E Moore; J M Mullin; T Nakajima; D R Nascimento; J A Nichols; P J Nichols; J Nieplocha; A Otero-de-la-Roza; B Palmer; A Panyala; T Pirojsirikul; B Peng; R Peverati; J Pittner; L Pollack; R M Richard; P Sadayappan; G C Schatz; W A Shelton; D W Silverstein; D M A Smith; T A Soares; D Song; M Swart; H L Taylor; G S Thomas; V Tipparaju; D G Truhlar; K Tsemekhman; T Van Voorhis; Á Vázquez-Mayagoitia; P Verma; O Villa; A Vishnu; K D Vogiatzis; D Wang; J H Weare; M J Williamson; T L Windus; K Woliński; A T Wong; Q Wu; C Yang; Q Yu; M Zacharias; Z Zhang; Y Zhao; R J Harrison Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: F Bencivenga; R Cucini; F Capotondi; A Battistoni; R Mincigrucci; E Giangrisostomi; A Gessini; M Manfredda; I P Nikolov; E Pedersoli; E Principi; C Svetina; P Parisse; F Casolari; M B Danailov; M Kiskinova; C Masciovecchio Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 49.962