| Literature DB >> 34909941 |
Ana Patrícia da Silva Souza1, Waleska Maria Almeida Barros1,2,3, José Maurício Lucas Silva2, Mariluce Rodrigues Marques Silva1, Ana Beatriz Januário Silva1, Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes1, Maria Eduarda Rodrigues Alves Dos Santos2, Mayara Luclécia da Silva2, Taciane Silva do Carmo2, Roberta Karlize Pereira Silva3, Karollainy Gomes da Silva3, Sandra Lopes de Souza1, Viviane de Oliveira Nogueira Souza4.
Abstract
Evidence shows that metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with a greater risk of developing Parkinson's disease (PD) because of the increase in oxidative stress levels along with other factors such as neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, because some studies have reported that MS is associated with a lower risk of PD, the relationship between MS and PD should be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of MS on PD. Two authors searched five electronic databases, namely, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Science Direct, for relevant articles between September and October 2020. After screening the title and abstract of all articles, 34 articles were selected for full-text review. Finally, 11 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the study. The quality of articles was critically evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute. Overall, we evaluated data from 23,586,349 individuals (including healthy individuals, with MS and PD) aged 30 years or more. In cohort studies, the follow-up period varied between 2 and 30 years. MS contributed considerably to the increase in the incidence of PD. In addition, obesity, a component of MS, alone can increase the probability of developing neurodegenerative diseases. However, despite few studies on MS and PD, changes in cognitive function and more rapid progression of PD disease has been documented in patients with MS using methods commonly used in research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34909941 PMCID: PMC8634740 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Flowchart of study selection.
Main characteristics of the included studies.
| Study, year, Country, Study design | Sample (number, sex, age or mean age) | Objective | Methods | Data collection instruments | Diagnosis of MS and related component | Results: biochemical parameters | Results: anthropometric variables | Main Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| N= 314.737 | To investigate the effect of MS on the incidence of PD | Analysis of data from the National health service database. (NHIS-HealS) (2002-2015) | Secondary data | Joint Interim Statement (JIS) | ↓ HDL | ↑ WC was not associated with the incidence of PD in individuals in general. | Average follow-up period: 7.23 years |
|
| N=562 | To evaluate the effect of MS on the phenotype of LRRK2 and PD GBA and on the prevalence of prodromal characteristics among individuals at risk for PD | Genetic tests for the G2019S mutation in the LRRK2 gene and for the AJ GBA mutations; laboratory tests; Information; cognitive, motor, olfactory and affective functions. | MDS-UPDRS; MoCA, BDI; NMSQ; SCOPA-AUT; RBDO; UPSIT. | Change in 3 of the 5 components: fasting glucose levels, BP, BMI, HDL, and TG. |
| Groups with PD and PNM did not differ in the number of metabolic components | |
|
| 56 F (25 pcts F with PD and 31 controls) aged 45 to 78 years | To examine the association of PD diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and risk of PD-CVD (as defined by the MS) with the levels of GC (cortisol and cortisone) in hair. | Analysis of hair samples, representing a 3-month retrospective window of GC levels using tandem mass chromatography liquid chromatography. | Glycemia, TG, HDL, HbA1c; LDL, total blood cholesterol. Sociodemographic data, MINI, UPDRS, H&I, NMSS; PSS-10; WHO STEPS; GPAQ. | Joint Interim Statement(JIS) | ↑ Capillary cortisone in PD patients than in controls. | Prevalence of MS in Pcts with PD was 56.0% and that in control individuals was 25.8%. | |
|
| N=6,098,405 | To assess the association between the serum GGT level and PD risk. Analyze the possible interaction between the GGT level and obesity or MS | National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database | Secondary data | Change in 3 of the 5 components or use of antihypertensive, hypoglycemic, or hypolipemic medication. | - | Factors associated with the serum GGT level were age, low income, BMI, current smoking, light to moderate alcohol consumption, exercise, DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and MS | Average follow-up period was 6.4 years. DP developed in 20,895 (0.34%) individuals (M: 9,512 and F: 11,383) |
|
| N=17,163,560 | To investigate the association of MS and its components with the development of PD in the South Korean population using large cohort data. | Analysis of NHIS data from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2012 and follow-up of pcts up to 31 December 2015. | Secondary data | National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. | Pcts with 3 MS components at ↑ 31% PD risk, and those with all 5 components at ↑ 66% risk compared with those without any component | MS group had higher mean BMI, WC, BP, glucose level, serum total cholesterol level, TG level, and LDL-C level. | Average follow-up period was 5.3 years. |
|
| N=787 | To investigate the effect of MS on cognitive impairment in PD. | Physical and neurological examinations, blood analysis and neuroimaging. | UPDRS, MMSE, RAVLT, Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging | National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III. | ↑ Individuals with PD-CCL and those with PDD had high levels of hypertension, glucose, and ↑ hypertriglyceridemia than individuals with PD-CN. | Individuals with PD-CCL and those with PDD were significantly older and had higher BMI, UPDRS 3 scores, H&Y stage, systolic and diastolic BP, glucose level, total cholesterol level, and TG level as well as longer duration of PD. Still had lower education level (<6 years), lacunar infarction, white matter lesions, and MS than those with PD-CN | At 5 years, 255 (32.4%) individuals were diagnosed with PD-CCL and 105 (13.3%) individuals were diagnosed with PDD. |
|
| 7 F pcts with PD and 11 M pcts with PD (age range: 50 to 74 years). | To compare peripheral quinurenines in AD and PD with an emphasis on quinurenines associated with MS (i.e., KYNA, ANA, 3-HK, and XA) | Analysis of blood samples collected after overnight fasting. | Analysis of Trp, Kyn, ANA, KYNA, and 3-HK using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, MMSE | N/S differences in plasma concentrations of Trp, Kyn, and all Kyn metabolites were found in untreated patients and patients treated with L-DOPA. | In Pcts with PD, ↓ Trp concentrations and the reason Kyn: Trp, Kyn, ANA and KYNA ↑ than in the control. | ||
|
| N=1022 | To compare the progression of PD between individuals with MS during the first 3 years of the trial and individuals with no evidence of MS. | Secondary analysis of patient data from the NET-DP LS study 1. The changes in the UPDRS and SDMT scores from randomization to 3 years were compared. | UPDRS, SDMT | National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (modified). | - | - | Pcts with older MS: propensity to be of the sex M (75.3% |
|
| 367 pcts (≥50 years old) with PD at baseline and 310 pcts at 24-month follow-up. | To investigate hypertension, dyslipidemia, DM, and BMI as possible risk factors for cognitive impairment in a large cohort of untreated patients with PD and without dementia. | Clinical and neurological examinations, biological sampling, neuropsychological assessments, and neuroimaging. Participants reassessed approximately after 24 months. | UPDRS, GDS, Girl, LNS, SDMT, HVLT-R, BJLO, total blood cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and TG. | Hypertension, DM, Obesity | HDL was correlated with BJLO performance at baseline | BMI was associated only with the verbal fluency Z score at 24 months. | Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity in 35.4% of the individuals at baseline and 41.1% of the individuals at follow-up. |
|
| N=194 | To evaluate the association between MS and occurrence of falls in patients with PD. | Recorded the history and number of falls in the last year. | ADL; IADLs; GDS; MMSE, UPDRS, MNA, dual energy X-rays | National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. | N/S associations were noted between the occurrence of falls and any of the components of SM. | - | 91 (47%) participants reported falls. |
|
| 6641 aged 30-79 years and without PD at baseline (1978-1980) | To investigate whether MS or its components, or serum total cholesterol, can predict the incidence of PD in a prospective cohort. | Based on the Mini-Finland Health Survey conducted from 1978 to 1980. | HDL, TG, Glycemia, and total cholesterol in the blood. 25-hydroxy vit D serum by radioimmunoassay | Harmonized definition of the metabolic syndrome | ↑ Serum TG and fasting plasma glucose predicted ↓ risk of PD, even after excluding the first 10 years of follow-up. | ↑ Risk suggestive of PD observed in overweight individuals | During 30-year follow-up (1978-2007), 89 incident cases of PD were recorded. |
Abbreviations: 3-HK, 3-hydroxyquinurenine; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADLs, Katz’s activities of daily living; ANA, anthranilic acid; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BJLO, Benton Judgment of Line Orientation; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CC, waist circumference; CVD, cardiovascular disease; F, female; GBA, glucocerebrosidase genes; GC, glucocorticoid; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; GGT, serum gamma-glutamyltransferase; GPAQ, global physical activity questionnaire; HbA1c, Glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; H HVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised; IADL, Lawton and Brody scale for instrumental activities of daily living; KYNA, quinurenic acid; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LNS, Letter–Number Sequencing; LRRK2-repeat of leucine-rich kinase 2; M, male; MINI, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment; MoCa, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MS, Metabolic syndrome; NET-PD LS 1, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke Exploratory Trials in the Long Term Study 1 of PD; NHIS-HEALS National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort; NMSQ, Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale; N/S, not significant; Pcts-patients; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PD-CN, Parkinson’s disease with normal cognitive function; PDD, Parkinson’s disease and dementia; PD-CCL, mild cognitive impairment in PD; PNM, Carrier not manifest; PSS10, Perceived Stress Scale; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; RBDO-REM, Sleep Behavior Disorder Questionnaire; SCOPA-AUT, Scale of Autonomic Function in PD; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; TG, triglycerides; Trp, Tryptophan; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; UPSIT, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; WHO STEPS, WHO STEPwise approach; WHR, waist to hip ratio; XA, xanthurenic acid.
Results of the critical assessment of the included studies (Cohort) using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach.
| Studies | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
N, no; NA, not applicable; U: unclear; Y, yes. Q1: Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Q2: Were the exposures measured similarly to assign individuals to both the exposed and unexposed groups? Q3: Was the exposure measured using a valid and reliable method? Q4: Were confounding factors identified? Q5: Were strategies to overcome the confounding factors stated? Q6: Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the time of exposure)? Q7: Were the outcomes measured using a valid and reliable method? Q8: Was the follow-up period reported and sufficiently long for outcomes to occur? Q9: Was follow-up complete, and if not, were the reasons for loss to follow-up described and explored? Q10: Were strategies to address incomplete follow-up used? Q11: Was an appropriate statistical analysis method used?
Results of the critical assessment of the included studies (Cross-sectional) using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach.
| Studies | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
| U | U | Y | Y | U | U | U | U |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
N, no; U, unclear; Y, yes. Q1: Were the inclusion criteria clearly defined? Q2: Were the study participants and context described in detail? Q3: Was exposure measured using a valid and reliable method? Q4: Were objective and standard criteria used to measure the condition? Q5: Were the confounding factors identified? Q6: Were strategies to overcome confounding factors used? Q7: Were the results measured using a valid and reliable method? Q8: Was an appropriate statistical analysis method used?
Results of the critical assessment of included studies (case-control) using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach.
| Studies | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
N, no, NA, not applicable; U, unclear, Y: Yes. Q1: Were the groups comparable, except for the presence of disease in patients and absence of disease in control individuals? Q2: Were patients and control individuals matched appropriately? Q3: Were the same criteria used for the identification of patients and control individuals? Q4: Was exposure measured using a standard, valid, and reliable method? Q5: Was the same method used to measure the exposure in both patients and control individuals? Q6: Were confounding factors identified? Q7: Were strategies to overcome the confounding factors stated? Q8: Were outcomes assessed using a standard, valid, and reliable method in patients and control individuals? Q9: Was the exposure period sufficiently long to be meaningful? Q10: Was an appropriate statistical analysis method used?