Literature DB >> 34909760

Long-Term Enrollment in Cardiac Rehabilitation Benefits of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Skeletal Muscle Strength in Females with Cardiovascular Disease.

Mike Pryzbek1, Maureen MacDonald2, Paul Stratford1, Julie Richardson1, Angelica McQuarrie3, Robert McKelvie4, Ada Tang1.   

Abstract

Background: The benefits of short-term cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for improving fitness are well known, but the effects of long-term maintenance-phase CR are less well established. Moreover, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscle strength with long-term CR have never been examined specifically in females, a population that is under-researched and under-represented in cardiovascular research. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to estimate changes in CRF and muscle strength in females enrolled in a long-term CR program.
Methods: Data from 39 females (mean ± standard deviation age 65 ± 9 years) enrolled for at least 1 year in a maintenance-phase CR program were analyzed. The program consisted of aerobic and resistance training, and data were collected annually for CRF (peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak, mL/kg/min]) and skeletal muscle strength (one-repetition maximum tests for chest press, seated row, and knee extension, kg). Mixed-model analyses were used to determine changes in CRF over the 5-year follow-up (203 observations) and muscle strength over 6 years (108 observations).
Results: The CRF increased in females by 1.8%/year over 5 years of CR enrollment, and muscle strength increased by 0.6%-2.1%/year over 6 years. These findings are in contrast to the expected age-related declines in fitness over time.
Conclusion: The positive long-term benefits on CRF and muscle strength in females provide initial preliminary support for maintenance-based CR, especially given that this population is commonly under-researched and under-represented in the CR literature. © Mike Pryzbek et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise training; fitness in women; long-term cardiac rehabilitation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34909760      PMCID: PMC8665274          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2021.0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


Introduction

It has been long understood that the global prevalence and mortality rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were higher in males than females, but more recent data suggest that the gap between the sexes is narrowing.[1] Despite similarities in disease prevalence, however, there remain differences in courses of care and health outcomes between women and men. Women are less likely to be investigated and treated for CVD[2-4]; they are diagnosed 10–20 years later,[2] present with more severe disease,[3] and have poorer prognoses[3-6] compared with men. Exercise-focused cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is well established as a core component of the continuum of care for individuals living with CVD. Evidence from a large systematic review of 63 studies and 14,486 participants provides strong support for short-term CR programs, typically lasting <12 months, for reducing cardiovascular mortality and hospital admissions in both men and women.[7] Importantly, these reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are associated with analogous improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)[8-11] and skeletal muscle strength.[11-15] Despite the strong evidence supporting CR, females have only represented 15% of data, and study results are usually not disaggregated by sex to allow sex-specific effect sizes to be determined.[7,14,16] Promisingly, of the few studies that did disaggregate by sex, improvements in CRF after short-term CR programs were reported to be equal,[17,18] if not greater,[19-22] in females compared with males. With growing awareness and recognition of the importance of sex and gender considerations in health research,[23] a meta-analysis was recently attempted to examine sex-based differences in the effects of CR on mortality and morbidity but ultimately was not undertaken because only 2 of the 80 studies provided data for females.[24] For long-term CR programs, a small body of evidence has reported improvements in fitness,[25-27] providing support for these programs as important opportunities for not only maintaining fitness but also reducing morbidity and mortality in individuals with CVD. To date, however, no studies of long-term CR have exclusively examined changes in fitness among females. Thus, the objective of this pilot study was to describe long-term changes in CRF and skeletal muscle strength in females enrolled in at least 12 months of a maintenance-phase CR program.

Materials and Methods

This study was a retrospective chart review of data for members in a community-based, maintenance-phase, exercise-focused CR program. The study was approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (#2017-1248) and utilized available data from program inception (January 1985) to December 2016. Participants provided consent for their data to be used on initiation into the program. Data were extracted from January till April 2017. Demographic information of age (years), height (cm), weight (kg), date of cardiovascular event or surgical procedure, time since event (time since cardiac event o program enrollment, in years), reason of enrollment, date of exercise test(s), and duration of enrollment (years) were extracted.

Study eligibility

For this analysis, we included participant data if they were female, enrolled for at least 12 months in the CR program, and had CRF data from at least two cardiopulmonary exercise tests conducted using cycle ergometry.

CR program

The CR program was a maintenance-phase, exercise-based program offered to community-dwelling adults ≥18 years old with CVD. Participants were referred to the program by their internal medicine specialist or family physician. Aerobic training began immediately on program entry, but initiation of upper body resistance training was delayed 6–8 weeks for those individuals recovering from cardiac surgery per published guidelines.[28] Exercise was individually prescribed. Aerobic exercise was prescribed at least 2 days/week for 30 minutes at 60%–65% of heart rate reserve. Resistance training loads were prescribed at 30%–40% and 50%–60% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) for upper and lower extremity major muscle groups, respectively, and performed for 1–3 sets of 12 repetitions. Blood pressure, heart rate, and rate of perceived exertion were recorded at the beginning and end of the exercise sessions for all participants, and they were monitored more frequently as needed if symptoms were observed. Exercise intensity and duration were progressed throughout enrollment per published guidelines.[28] Members were encouraged to attend the program at least twice weekly, and to add aerobic exercise outside the program to meet physical activity guidelines of 150 minutes of moderate-vigorous activity per week. Attendance to the program was not regularly monitored. Adherence records were not available. Self-management and heart-healthy living education was provided informally via brochures and knowledge translation seminars, in which program staff would provide ongoing advice and information for maintaining cardiovascular health and answer member questions.

Study outcomes

The CRF was the primary outcome of interest. The CRF was measured by using cardiopulmonary exercise tests conducted annually and represented by peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Each datapoint for VO2peak was considered one observation. Exercise tests were conducted by using cycle ergometry, and VO2peak (mL/kg/min) was measured by using breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry averaged over 15 seconds (Vmax CareFusion, Vyaire Medical, Mettawa, IL). All tests were conducted by a cardiovascular technologist with physician supervision. Medications were not withheld. Workload started at 100 kpm/min and increased by 100 kpm/min every minute until test termination. Heart rate (beats/minute) and blood pressure (mmHg) were also measured at rest, at peak, and throughout the test. Upper and lower body skeletal muscle strength outcomes were available for a subset of members (n = 19/39, 49%) who attended annual assessments at a testing site that possessed the necessary equipment (Hydrafitness Omnikinetics, Belton, TX) to conduct the tests. Muscle strength was quantified by using 1RM (kg) for chest press, seated back row, and knee extension. Standardized procedures to determine 1RM were followed.[28] Each datapoint for 1RM was considered one observation. Data for VO2peak, 1RM for chest press, seated back row, and knee extension, and resting and peak heart rate and blood pressure were extracted from program members' charts for all available time points.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed by using Stata 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Descriptive statistics (means ± standard deviation) and frequencies (n, %) were used to describe demographic information and baseline characteristics. Mixed-model analyses for longitudinal data were applied to examine the relationship between changes in the dependent variables (VO2peak and 1RM chest press, seated back row, and knee extension) and the independent variable (enrollment time, years), controlling for age at the time of enrollment. Models were explored for linear and non-linear growth based on the findings of the Lowess curves and likelihood ratio tests indicating the best model. Tests of interactions between enrollment time and age were performed. Relevant random effects and the most appropriate covariance structure were identified. The Bayesian Information Criteria were used to identify the best fitting model.

Results

Figure 1 displays a flowchart representing the data extraction and inclusion process. Five hundred ninety-nine members' charts were reviewed, of which data from 39 females who met the study eligibility criteria were used for analysis. Longitudinal CRF data for all 39 females were included in the analysis, and data for muscle strength were available for a subset of 19.
FIG. 1.

Flow of data extracted and included in the analysis. One observation is a single measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) or muscle strength at any point in time.

Flow of data extracted and included in the analysis. One observation is a single measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) or muscle strength at any point in time. All fitness outcomes were analyzed by using linear models based on the findings of the Lowess curves and likelihood ratio tests indicating the best model. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age at the time of enrollment was 65.0 years. Baseline VO2peak was 16.8 mL/kg/min, which is comparable to values reported from other studies of females with CVD[24] and represents 64%–70% of values for age-matched females without CVD.[29]
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of 39 Females Enrolled in the CR Program

VariablenValue
Age (years)3965.0 ± 8.7
Weight (kg)3374.0 ± 19.7
Height (cm)33160.5 ± 6.6
Reason for enrollment: n (%)39 
 Coronary bypass graft 12 (30.8)
 Coronary angioplasty 5 (12.8)
 Valve surgery 4 (10.3)
 Myocardial infarction 8 (20.5)
 Other 10 (25.6)
Time since event (years)321.3 (1.7)
Enrollment duration (years)396.2 ± 4.8
Resting values
 Heart rate (beats/min)3471 ± 11
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)39135 ± 20
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)3977 ± 8
Peak values
 Heart rate (beats/min)39129 ± 25
  % age-predicted maximum heart rate3980 ± 14
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)28172 ± 21
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)2884 ± 24
 VO2peak (mL/kg/min)3916.8 ± 5.1
1RM
 Chest press (kg)1939 ± 14
 Seated back row (kg)1933 ± 11
 Leg extension (kg)1932 ± 11

Values are means ± standard deviations for continuous variables, frequency (percentage) for categorical variables.

1RM, 1-repetition maximum; CR, cardiac rehabilitation.

Baseline Characteristics of 39 Females Enrolled in the CR Program Values are means ± standard deviations for continuous variables, frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. 1RM, 1-repetition maximum; CR, cardiac rehabilitation. Overall, the mean program enrollment duration was 6.2 years but on closer inspection, there were nine females (23%) with enrollment durations exceeding 10 years. As such, there were fewer observations toward the upper limits of enrollment time. Data were, thus, truncated at 5 years for CRF and 6 years for muscle strength for the analysis to preserve ≥70% available data and improve the generalizability of the mixed models. Table 2 displays the computed changes in VO2peak and muscle strength over 5 and 6 years of enrollment, respectively. Table 3 shows the mixed-model analysis of the age-adjusted linear trajectory of VO2peak over 5 years of enrollment in CR. There were no interactions found between enrollment time and age at enrollment. According to Bayesian model statistics, the best fitting model was linear and included a random intercept [variance estimate (standard error) 14.8 (3.8), 95% confidence interval 8.89, 24.5] but no effect of a random slope, indicating inter-individual variability in baseline VO2peak but similar individual trajectories. Data based on the β coefficients from this model indicate that the VO2peak increased by 1.8%/year over enrollment time.
Table 2.

Computed Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness (VO2peak) and Muscle Strength (1-Repetition Maximum) Since Enrollment

CRFBaseline1 year5 years
VO2peak (mL/kg/min)17.0 ± 0.7 (15.7, 18.4)17.3 ± 0.7 (16.0, 18.6)18.3 ± 0.8 (16.7, 19.9)

Values are mean ± SE (95% CI).

CI, confidence interval; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; SE, standard error.

Table 3.

Mixed-Model Analysis on Changes in VO2peak Levels in Females Older Than 5 Years of CR Enrollment After Controlling for Age (n = 39, 123 Observations)

Fixed and random-effects components from 0 to 5 years of enrollment
Fixed-effects variablesβ (SE)95% CIp
 Time0.26 (0.14)−0.02, 0.540.072
 Age at enrollment−0.25 (0.08)−0.40, −0.100.001[*]
 Constant33.1 (5.0)23, 43<0.0001[*]

p < 0.05.

Computed Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness (VO2peak) and Muscle Strength (1-Repetition Maximum) Since Enrollment Values are mean ± SE (95% CI). CI, confidence interval; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; SE, standard error. Mixed-Model Analysis on Changes in VO2peak Levels in Females Older Than 5 Years of CR Enrollment After Controlling for Age (n = 39, 123 Observations) p < 0.05. Table 4 shows the mixed-model analyses for age-adjusted trajectories for 1RM chest press, seated back row, and knee extension over 6 years of CR enrollment. Based on the Bayesian model statistics, linear models with random intercepts best captured the changes observed in seated back row and knee extension muscle strength, whereas the linear model with a random intercept, random slope, and an unstructured covariance structure best captured the trajectory of chest press.
Table 4.

Mixed-Model Analysis on Changes in Muscle Strength for 1) Chest Press, 2) Seated Back Row, and 3) Knee Extension in Females Older Than 6 Years of CR Enrollment After Controlling for Age (n = 19, 66 Observations)

Fixed- and random-effects components from 0 to 6 years of enrollment
1) Chest press
Fixed-effects variablesβ (SE)95% CIp
 Time0.25 (0.70)−1.13, 1.620.725
 Age at enrollment−0.85 (0.20)−1.24, −0.45<0.0001[*]
 Constant94 (13)68, 119<0.0001[*]

p < 0.05.

Mixed-Model Analysis on Changes in Muscle Strength for 1) Chest Press, 2) Seated Back Row, and 3) Knee Extension in Females Older Than 6 Years of CR Enrollment After Controlling for Age (n = 19, 66 Observations) p < 0.05. There were no interactions between enrollment time and age. Muscle strength increased by 0.6 to 2.1%/year over 6 years, but it only reached statistical significance for the seated back row.

Discussion

This study provides the initial evidence to suggest that females enrolled in a maintenance-phase CR program demonstrate trajectories of continuous improvements in both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal fitness over 5–6 years of enrollment. The continued increase in CRF and muscle strength over time in females with CVD are in contrast not only to the non-linear changes previously reported among males enrolled in long-term CR[27] but also to the expected declines in fitness associated with aging as reported in females without CVD.[29-31] It is possible that the access to long-term CR may mitigate aging-related fitness declines in women. These findings underscore first, that sex-based considerations are needed in CR research and second, that sex-specific analysis can provide greater insight into the benefits of long-term CR for individuals living with CVD. The possible mechanisms underlying the differential effects of long-term exercise on fitness between males and females are unknown, but sex- and gender-related differences in physiological and behavioral factors may provide some insight. Cardiac output and left ventricular mass,32.33 flow-mediated vasodilation,[34] and muscle mass and strength[35] decline to a lesser degree with aging in females compared with males, which may partially account for greater exercise-related benefits in fitness observed in females. Sex hormones may also play a role, as the loss of testosterone in males after the age of 40 and the associated loss of skeletal muscle mass can contribute to accelerated declines in fitness.[36-39] We note that in the current study, one-third of female participants were aged 40–59 years at program entry and thus may still have benefited from the cardio-protective effects of estrogen before menopause.[37,38] Finally, the relative preservation of fat-free mass in aging females compared with males may also support analogous sex-specific preservation of fitness levels.[38] Behavioral factors, such as program attendance and adherence, may also help to explain differences in fitness changes between men and women. It is known that women with CVD are less likely than men to be referred to, and participate in, CR programs[40,41] but interestingly, among those who do enroll in CR, women are more likely to meet the recommended ≥150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity physical activity.42 Such behavioral factors associated with CR enrollment and adherence likely reflect gender-related differences that are beyond the scope of the current study, yet they underscore the importance of identifying strategies to overcome barriers to enrollment and participation in CR among women. We acknowledge the limitations of this study. The sample size of 39 females limits the generalizability of the findings, and due to the retrospective nature of this analysis, we cannot infer causal links for the observed changes in fitness with CR enrollment in females. Insights could not be gained through program attendance, adherence or physical activity records, as this information was not available. We acknowledge that there may be a risk of sampling bias, as individuals who were less likely to demonstrate improvements in fitness may not have enrolled in CR or been able to continue with the program over the long term; however, information on loss to follow-up as a result of morbidity or mortality was not available. The variance estimates, relative to the average slopes in the data, must be interpreted with caution as large between-participant variations in fitness trajectories were observed due to the small sample. Future studies with larger samples are needed to investigate these between-level changes in long-term CR programs. However, this study also has several strengths. Despite the small sample size, our dataset provided a high number of observations over multiple time points, thereby permitting mixed-model analyses that adds to our understanding of long-term trajectories of fitness and that are superior to conventional pre–post measurement research designs. The data in the current study further allowed for the identification of potential non-linear and random effects; this method of modeling provides a more complete picture of changes in fitness over time, thus improving the interpretability and generalizability of the findings. This was the first study to report on fitness trajectories over 5–6 years of CR in females, which was not possible in other studies of long-term CR that did not disaggregate data by sex.[24]

Conclusions

Females are under-represented in CR research.[7] Our results offer new, sex-specific evidence suggesting a trajectory of continued improved fitness in females with long-term enrollment in CR. Moreover, the improvements observed are in contrast with the expected declines in fitness that would be expected to occur with aging. These findings provide initial evidence to suggest the potential benefits of long-term exercise opportunities as strategies for secondary prevention in this high-risk population of females. Larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm the observations, and to identify the potential mechanisms underlying these changes.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for sex differences in cardiovascular aging and adaptive responses to physical activity.

Authors:  Beth A Parker; Martha J Kalasky; David N Proctor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Women: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain?

Authors:  Nina Johnston; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Evaluation of peripheral muscle strength of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Kelli Maria Souza Santos; Manoel Luiz de Cerqueira Neto; Vitor Oliveira Carvalho; Valter Joviniano de Santana Filho; Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior; Amaro Afrânio Araújo Filho; Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira; Lucas de Assis Pereira Cacau
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

5.  Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in women with chronic heart failure: mood, fitness, and exercise safety.

Authors:  Frances M Wise; Jennifer M Patrick
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  Gender differences in the decline in aerobic capacity and its physiological determinants during the later decades of life.

Authors:  Edward P Weiss; Robert J Spina; John O Holloszy; Ali A Ehsani
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-02-23

7.  Impact of age, sex, and exercise on brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation.

Authors:  Mark A Black; N Timothy Cable; Dick H J Thijssen; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 8.  Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liz Samayoa; Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely; Lisa Benz Scott; Susan Marzolini; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Gender differences in the efficacy of cardiovascular rehabilitation in patients after cardiac surgery procedures.

Authors:  Mauro Feola; Sonia Garnero; Beatrice Daniele; Claudia Mento; Fabio Dell'Aira; Giuliana Chizzolini; Marzia Testa
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015.

Authors:  Gregory A Roth; Catherine Johnson; Amanuel Abajobir; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw Ferede Abera; Gebre Abyu; Muktar Ahmed; Baran Aksut; Tahiya Alam; Khurshid Alam; François Alla; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Stephen Amrock; Hossein Ansari; Johan Ärnlöv; Hamid Asayesh; Tesfay Mehari Atey; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Ashish Awasthi; Amitava Banerjee; Aleksandra Barac; Till Bärnighausen; Lars Barregard; Neeraj Bedi; Ezra Belay Ketema; Derrick Bennett; Gebremedhin Berhe; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Shimelash Bitew; Jonathan Carapetis; Juan Jesus Carrero; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Carlos Andres Castañeda-Orjuela; Jacqueline Castillo-Rivas; Ferrán Catalá-López; Jee-Young Choi; Hanne Christensen; Massimo Cirillo; Leslie Cooper; Michael Criqui; David Cundiff; Albertino Damasceno; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Kairat Davletov; Samath Dharmaratne; Prabhakaran Dorairaj; Manisha Dubey; Rebecca Ehrenkranz; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Alireza Esteghamati; Talha Farid; Maryam Farvid; Valery Feigin; Eric L Ding; Gerry Fowkes; Tsegaye Gebrehiwot; Richard Gillum; Audra Gold; Philimon Gona; Rajeev Gupta; Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Tesfaye Hailu; Gessessew Bugssa Hailu; Graeme Hankey; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Masako Horino; Peter J Hotez; Kathryn Jacobsen; Spencer James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Denny John; Jost Jonas; Yogeshwar Kalkonde; Chante Karimkhani; Amir Kasaeian; Yousef Khader; Abdur Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Sahil Khera; Abdullah T Khoja; Jagdish Khubchandani; Daniel Kim; Dhaval Kolte; Soewarta Kosen; Kristopher J Krohn; G Anil Kumar; Gene F Kwan; Dharmesh Kumar Lal; Anders Larsson; Shai Linn; Alan Lopez; Paulo A Lotufo; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Reza Malekzadeh; Mohsen Mazidi; Toni Meier; Kidanu Gebremariam Meles; George Mensah; Atte Meretoja; Haftay Mezgebe; Ted Miller; Erkin Mirrakhimov; Shafiu Mohammed; Andrew E Moran; Kamarul Imran Musa; Jagat Narula; Bruce Neal; Frida Ngalesoni; Grant Nguyen; Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer; Mayowa Owolabi; George Patton; João Pedro; Dima Qato; Mostafa Qorbani; Kazem Rahimi; Rajesh Kumar Rai; Salman Rawaf; Antônio Ribeiro; Saeid Safiri; Joshua A Salomon; Itamar Santos; Milena Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Aletta Schutte; Sadaf Sepanlou; Masood Ali Shaikh; Min-Jeong Shin; Mehdi Shishehbor; Hirbo Shore; Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Eugene Sobngwi; Saverio Stranges; Soumya Swaminathan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Niguse Tadele Atnafu; Fisaha Tesfay; J S Thakur; Amanda Thrift; Roman Topor-Madry; Thomas Truelsen; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Olalekan Uthman; Tommi Vasankari; Vasiliy Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Tolassa Wakayo; David Watkins; Robert Weintraub; Andrea Werdecker; Ronny Westerman; Charles Shey Wiysonge; Charles Wolfe; Abdulhalik Workicho; Gelin Xu; Yuichiro Yano; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Theo Vos; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Aerobic, Strength and Flexibility Exercise Training Program in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Squeo; Barbara Di Giacinto; Marco Alfonso Perrone; Massimo Santini; Maria Luisa Sette; Emanuele Fabrizi; Antonia Vaquer; Attilio Parisi; Antonio Spataro; Alessandro Biffi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-06-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.