Efficacy and safety of recombinant human erythropoietin (Hema-Plus®) for management of anemia in Thai patients on peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Hema-Plus, a recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) or epoetin alfa has shown effectiveness in correction of anemia in Thai population in clinical practice. This study was aimed to demonstrate efficacy and safety under the evidence-based approach. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rHuEPO (Hema-Plus) for treatment of anemia over 12 wk in Thai patients with Stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD) on peritoneal dialysis (PD).
METHODS: This study was an open-label, multi-center study to enroll 30 CKD patients identified to start PD with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 9.5 g/dL, serum ferritin more than 100 ng/mL, serum transferrin saturation more than or equal to 20% and who had not previously received epoetin. Patients with conditions that could increase the risk of adverse effects from study participation or interfere with study outcomes, were using concomitant androgens or had secondary hyperparathyroidism were excluded. All eligible patients started Hema-Plus by SC injection at 4000 IU once or twice weekly (week 0) and with follow-up at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Dosage adjustment could be done to achieve Hb level of 11-12 g/dL. Primary end point was mean change in Hb level from baseline to end of treatment (week 12). Safety was assessed throughout the study. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using KDQOL-36.
RESULTS: All 30 enrolled patients completed the study. Mean (standard deviation) Hb at baseline (week 0) to the end of 12 wk was significantly increased from 7.39 (1.29) g/dL to 11.15 (1.73) g/dL (paired t-test, P value < 0.001). Overall change of Hb means from baseline over the other 4 visits was statistically significantly increased (repeated measure ANOVA, P value < 0.001). Ten out of 39 adverse events (AEs) were serious. Two serious AEs were probably related to study medication by investigators' assessment. At week 12, the QoL scores in all domains were significantly increased from baseline.
CONCLUSION: Hema-Plus administered for 12 wk for treatment of anemia in patients on PD effectively increased Hb levels with acceptable safety profile. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Core Tip: This was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of Hema-Plus®, a recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) for management of anemia in 30 Thai chronic kidney disease patients who started peritoneal dialysis with hemoglobin (Hb) lower than 9.5 g/dL and who had not previously received epoetin. The results showed that the rHuEPO could significantly increase Hb from baseline throughout the 12-wk treatment duration with acceptable safety profile. The quality of life (QoL) scores at week 12 assessed using KDQOL-36 were significantly increased from baseline in all domains.

INTRODUCTION

Anemia is a common condition among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This anemia is an almost inevitable feature of CKD, especially end-stage renal disease because the kidneys play an important role in the production of erythropoietin which supports erythropoiesis. Renal anemia begins in early stages of CKD and worsens as it progresses[1,2]. When anemia is left untreated the consequences can be severe. The more dangerous impacts include cardiovascular disease, worsening angina symptoms, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and congestive heart failure. These abnormalities reduce the quality of life (QoL), interfere with rehabilitation and decrease survival in patients with CKD[1,3-5].

The primary etiology of anemia associated with CKD is insufficient renal production of the erythropoietin. Additionally, other factors contributing to anemia in CKD include iron deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, acute and chronic inflammatory disease, and shortened red blood cell survival[4,6]. The treatment of anemia in patients with CKD provides the following known beneficial effects: A reduced requirement for blood transfusions and associated complications, improved QoL, decreased hospitalizations and reduced overall healthcare costs[4,5].

The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for treatment of renal anemia can relieve the anemia symptoms and improve QoL[7,8]. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) or epoetin alfa is generally well tolerated. In patients with chronic renal failure the adverse events (AEs) reported from a clinical point of view include hypertension, increased blood pressure, seizures, thrombotic vascular events, headache, increased heart rate, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pyrexia, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypersensitivity reaction (rash, urticarial, anaphylactic reaction, angio-edema), and increased incidence of thrombotic vascular events. A rare, but serious complication related to epoetin is antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA)[8,9]. When treated with ESA, patients with anemia and CKD may encounter hyporesponsiveness. Many factors contribute to ESA hyporesponsiveness such as iron deficiency, non-adherence to iron or ESA therapy, acute/chronic blood loss, infection, inflammation, inadequate dialysis, aluminum overload, malignancy, chronic conditions, hyperparathyroidism, and PRCA[3,10]. Practice guidelines suggest evaluation for specific causes of hyporesponsiveness when the Hb level is inappropriately low for the ESA dose administered[7,11].

Hema-Plus is a rHuEPO. The product was approved for marketing in the manufacturing country in 1998. To date, the product has been registered in more than 20 countries. The product was approved for marketing in Thailand in September 2012. This study was proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the product in the management of anemia in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and also the QoL of those patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and setting

This was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, phase IV study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Hema-Plus® in correcting anemia among CKD patients receiving PD. The study was conducted at three dialysis centers offering continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) services in Thailand, i.e., Banphaeo Hospital, Udon Thani Hospital, and Siriraj Hospital.

Patients underwent PD catheter implantation following normal practice at each study site. Following the break-in period, eligible patients commenced PD and started a 12-wk treatment of Hema-Plus® on the same day. The efficacy and safety of the study drug along with the impact on patients’ QoL were assessed.

The study was conducted in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization–Good Clinical Practice Guideline and the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee at each participating site, prior to the study initiation. All patients gave written informed consent. The study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR), URL http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR ID: 20140128002). The study adhered to The Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines[12].

Patients and eligibility criteria

Eligibility was assessed during a 2-wk screening period. CKD patients aged 18–70 years who were indicated to start PD based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and had hemoglobin (Hb) < 9.5 g/dL, serum ferritin > 100 ng/mL and serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥ 20% were enrolled in the study. The eGFR was calculated by using the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation[13].

Patients who previously received epoetin or any investigational drugs (within 3 mo of screening) or had blood transfusion (within 7 d prior to screening) or received concurrent treatment with either androgenic agents or immunosuppressive therapy were considered ineligible. This study also excluded patients with the following conditions: Poorly controlled hypertension or ischemic heart disease; congestive heart failure; infection or inflammatory disease (within 4 wk prior to screening); secondary hyperparathyroidism; history of seizure; previous malignant tumor or residual tumor after anticancer therapy; active bleeding or history of bleeding disorders; infections with HIV or hepatitis B or C viruses; signs, symptoms and laboratory assessment associated with erythropoietin-resistant bone marrow diseases such as aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, myelophthisis anemia and PRCA; known hypersensitivity to products derived from mammalian cells or containing human albumin; pregnant or breastfeeding; and women with childbearing potential unwilling to use an effective birth control method.

Study treatment and assessments

Participants were treated with Hema-Plus® (rHuEPO), either in the form of sterile vials or prefilled syringes, via self-administered subcutaneous injections at 4000 IU/dose once or twice weekly, as per the usual practice of each participating site. In order to achieve or maintain the Hb level within the target range of 11–12 g/dL[14], dose adjustment was permitted at the discretion of the investigator. The trial treatment period was 12 wk with the first dose was given at week 0 (baseline). It was recommended to give all patients oral supplementation of iron, vitamin B12 and/or folic acid.

A physical examination, a complete blood count and concomitant medications review was conducted at every visit (weeks 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12). AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed throughout the study and during each visit, using the following scale of severity—mild, moderate and severe. Analyses of serum ferritin, TSAT and blood chemistry were performed at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Dialysis adequacy was evaluated anytime during weeks 4 and 8. The QoL was assessed by interview at initial screening and end of the study (week 12), using the Thai language version of kidney disease QoL instrument (KDQOL-36)[15,16]. If erythropoietin-induced, antibody-mediated PRCA was suspected, an anti-erythropoietin antibodies test could be performed.

Study outcomes and follow-up

All efficacy end points were assessed at the end of study treatment (week 12), with the primary end point being mean Hb level at week 12. The secondary efficacy end points were the percentage of patients achieving target Hb level, mean percentage change from baseline of Hb level and the QoL scores. The safety end point was assessed through frequency and percentages of AEs, and SAEs throughout the treatment period.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population. The sample size estimation in this study was based on changes of Hb from 8.0 ± 1.3 g/dL at baseline to 10.5 ± 1.6 g/dL at week 12 in a previous study[17] and from 7.1 ± 1.14 g/dL at baseline to 10.1 ± 1.49 g/dL at week 12 in another study[18], in which hemodialysis patients were studied, and a change of hematocrit from 23.8 ± 3.8 g/dL at baseline to 33.7 ± 4.8 g/dL at week 12 among PD patients in a study by Nissenson et al[19]. With a type I error of 0.05 allowed and a power of 80% required, a sample size of 15 to 27 patients was required. With a 10% lost to follow-up, this study proposed a sample of 30 patients.

Mean Hb level and mean QoL scores at week 12 were compared with the respective data at week 0 using paired t-tests. Repeated measure ANOVA with multiple pair-wise comparisons with Benferroni-Holm step down adjustment was employed to determine the changes of mean Hb level at each visit compared with their respective previous visits. All statistical analyses were performed by a qualified statistician using SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). For missing data, the last observation carried forward imputation method was employed. A two-sided P value for significance of less than 0.05 was applied for all statistical analyses in this study.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Out of 58 patients screened, 37 were enrolled and received at least one dose of the study drug. Seven patients were discontinued from the study and excluded from efficacy analysis due to ineligibility since enrollment. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analysis (n = 37), and the thirty patients who met all inclusion criteria and did not meet any exclusion criteria were included in efficacy analysis (n = 30).

The 30 eligible patients completed the 12-wk treatment with Hema-Plus® (Figure 1). Of these, 18 (60%) were male. The mean age of patients was 48.8 years [standard deviation (SD) = 13.6] with the mean Hb level of 7.4 g/dL (SD = 1.3). Baseline characteristics are further described in Table 1. The average dose received by patients was 6466.7 IU/wk (SD = 1899; range: 3333.3–11666.7), equivalent to 117.6 IU/kg/week (SD = 42.2; range: 58.4–269.8).

Figure 1

Study flow diagram. ITT: Intention-to-treat analysis; HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus; PTH: Parathyroid hormone.

Table 1

Demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients (n = 30)

Characteristics
Sex—No. of patients (%)
Male	18.0	(60.0)
Female	12.0	(40.0)
Age (years)1	48.8	(13.6)
Weight (kg)1	55.9	(11.1)
TSAT (%)2	39.6	(23.0)
Ferritin (ng/mL)2	931.2	(592.7)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)1	7.4	(1.3)
Hematocrit (%)1	22.2	(4.0)
Reticulocyte count (%)1	1.1	(0.9)
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2	6.2	(3.3)
BUN (mg%)2	77.1	(34.2)
Creatinine (mg%)2	10.0	(4.5)
Albumin (g%)2	3.8	(0.6)
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL)2,4	922.3	(422.9)
Folic acid (ng/mL)2,4
RBC folate (n = 19)	8192.8	(4785.0)
Serum folate (n = 10)	102.2	(217.4)
C-reactive protein (mg/L)2	10.7	(29.5)

All data were presented as mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise stated.

Data from screening visit.

Data from Week 0 prior to study drug initiation.

Data were calculated using chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula[13].

Data available in 29 patients. BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; RBC: Red blood cell; TSAT: Transferrin saturation.

Hb levels

At the end of the study, Hb levels of all participants increased from baseline. The mean Hb level at week 12 was significantly higher than that of week 0 [11.2 g/dL (SD = 1.7) vs 7.4 g/dL (SD = 1.3); P < 0.001], corresponding to a percentage change of 53.8% (SD = 26.7; range: 8.2–134.6). Elevation of Hb levels was observed throughout the study period (Figure 2). When the Hb levels at each visit were compared with those of the prior visit, the increases in mean Hb levels were found to be significant (Table 2).

Figure 2

Mean hemoglobin levels throughout the study ( a P < 0.001 vs week 0, paired t-test.

Table 2

Pair-wise comparison of hemoglobin changes between 2 consecutive visits (n = 30)

Comparison	Hb change1	P value	Significance criteria
Week 0 vs Week 2	0.7 (0.2)	0.0003	0.0250
Week 2 vs Week 4	1.3 (0.2)	< 0.0001	0.0167
Week 4 vs Week 8	1.3 (0.2)	< 0.0001	0.0125
Week 8 vs Week 12	0.6 (0.2)	0.0060	0.0500

Data were presented as mean (standard error). P values and significance criteria presented were those after the pair-wise comparisons based on Bonferroni-Holm step-down adjustment. SE: Standard error; Hb: Hemoglobin.

Overall, 18 participants (60%) had achieved the Hb levels within or exceeding the targets upon completion of the study drug treatment. Of these, 8 (26.7%) had their Hb levels within the target range of 11–12 g/dL; while, the Hb levels were greater than 13 g/dL in 10 participants (33.3%). Ten out of 12 patients with below-the-target Hb levels achieved increases in Hb concentrations of equal or greater than 2 g/dL (Figure 3). This is in line with the kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline[20] which recommends the increase of Hb level at the rate of 1–2 g/dL per month. Therefore, those patients were considered as responding to the treatment.

Figure 3

Changes from baseline of hemoglobin levels among patients with below-the-target hemoglobin levels at week 12 ( ∆: Differences between Hb level at week 0 and week 12; Hb: Hemoglobin.

We performed additional analysis to compare Hb levels at baseline and week 12 by the factors that could affect the ESA response, i.e. thalassemia, infection, hemolysis, blood loss, hyperparathyroidism, low blood folic acid, and iron deficiency. However, only infection had a certain variation, i.e. 36.67% of the 30 patients having infection (i.e. exit site infection, peritonitis, pneumonia, and cellulitis), which was adequate to test for statistical significance. Table 3 shows frequency of patients with factors potentially affecting ESA response. Repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare Hb levels between patients with and without infection. Overall, it was found that infection was significantly associated with different Hb level (P value = 0.001). Patients with infection had a significantly lower Hb level at baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 12 (P value = 0.001, 0.004, 0.034, 0.035 and 0.005, respectively) when compared to the patients without infection. Table 4 presents the comparisons of Hb at each visit by infection status and Figure 4 shows estimated marginal means of Hb levels from baseline to week 12 by infection status using repeated measure ANOVA.

Table 3

Frequency of patients with factors potentially affecting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent response (n = 30)

Factors potentially affecting ESA response	n (%)
Thalassemia	1 (3.33)
Infection	11 (36.67)
Hemolysis	0
Blood loss	0
Hyperparathyroidism	1 (3.33)
Low blood folic acid	0
Iron deficiency	3 (10.00)

ESA: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent.

Table 4

Comparisons of hemoglobin at each visit by infection status (n = 30)

Visit	Hemoglobin levels (g/dL), mean (SD)		P value
	Infection (n = 11)	Non-infection (n = 19)
Visit 2 (week 0; baseline)	6.41(1.48)	7.95 (0.75)	0.001a	0.001b
Visit 3 (week 2)	7.00 (1.51)	8.68 (1.33)	0.004a
Visit 4 (week 4)	8.56 (1.53)	9.75 (1.33)	0.034a
Visit 5 (week 8)	9.85 (1.40)	11.00 (1.36)	0.035a
Visit 6 (week 12)	10.04 (1.73)	11.80 (1.39)	0.005a

Data were presented as mean (standard deviation).

Repeated measure ANOVA comparing hemoglobin (Hb) level between patients with and without infection within each visit.

Repeated measure ANOVA testing the effect of infection on overall Hb level.

Figure 4

Estimated marginal means of hemoglobin levels from baseline to week 12 by infection using repeated measure ANOVA.

QoL

Treatment with Hema-Plus® improved the patients’ health-related QoL as determined by the KDQOL-36™ survey (Table 5). At week 12, there were significant increases in KDQOL-36 scores from baseline in all aspects evaluated-physical and mental health as well as symptoms and burden of the kidney disease.

Table 5

Comparisons of kidney disease quality of life instrument–36 scores at baseline and week 12 (n = 30)

Parameter	Week 0		Week 12		∆		P value1
SF-12 scores
Physical health composite	36.8	(8.2)	41.5	(9.8)	4.8	(8.5)	0.004
Mental health composite	41.5	(9.6)	48.4	(8.4)	6.9	(10.7)	0.001
Burden of kidney disease	34.4	(28.4)	46.0	(31.3)	11.7	(25.0)	0.016
Symptoms/problems of kidney disease	65.6	(19.6)	79.4	(13.6)	13.8	(20.4)	0.001
Effects of kidney disease	63.0	(18.2)	76.3	(18.4)	13.3	(23.6)	0.004

Data were presented as mean (standard deviation).

Paired t-test. ∆: Differences in KDQOL–36 scores between week 0 and week 12; KDQOL: Kidney disease quality of life instrument; SF: Short form health survey.

Safety

Overall, 39 AEs were reported from 18 patients (out of 37 patients included in the safety population) during the study period (Table 6). Most of those (37/39) were deemed very unlikely to be related to the study drug. All reported AEs were mild (30/39) to moderate (7/39), except one case of volume overload which was classified as a severe event, but very unlikely to be related to the study drug. A total of 10 SAEs occurred in 7 patients. Of these, two occurrences of hypertensive urgency were deemed to be probably related to the study drug. The most frequently reported AEs, occurring in more than 10% of the patients, were exit site infection/inflammation and edema.

Table 6

Adverse events (n = 37)

Adverse events	No. of patients (%)	No. of events
Total	18 (48.65)	39
Blood and lymphatic disorders
Bicytopenia1	1 (2.70)	1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea	1 (2.70)	1
Nausea	1 (2.70)	1
Infections and infestations
Exit site infection/inflammation	6 (16.22)	6
Pneumonia1	2 (5.40)	2
Eosinophilic peritonitis	2 (5.40)	2
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Closed fractures of femur1	1 (2.70)	1
Accidental tear small bowel1	1 (2.70)	1
Investigations
Hyperkalemia	1 (2.70)	1
Hypokalemia	1 (2.70)	1
Hyperphosphatemia	1 (2.70)	1
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycemia	2 (5.40)	2
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Acute arthritis	1 (2.70)	1
Nervous system disorders
Headache	1 (2.70)	1
Dizziness	1 (2.70)	1
Renal and urinary disorders
Volume overload1,2	1 (2.70)	1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chest discomfort	1 (2.70)	1
Bronchospasm	1 (2.70)	1
Pleural effusion1	1 (2.70)	1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Edema	4 (10.81)	4
Paleness	1 (2.70)	2
Cellulitis	1 (2.70)	1
Itching from dry skin	1 (2.70)	1
Surgical and medical procedures
Catheter malfunction/ malposition3	2 (5.40)	2
Vascular disorder
Hypertensive urgency1,4	2 (5.40)	2

Serious adverse event.

Severe adverse event.

Only one out of two events were serious adverse event.

The causality was deemed as probable.

None of the AEs led to discontinuation or modification of the study treatment. Most events (32/39), including all SAEs, were improved or recovered. There was no new or unexpected safety signals observed.

DISCUSSION

The treatment of anemia in patients with CKD with ESAs has provided the following known beneficial effects: A reduced requirement for blood transfusions and the associated complications, improvement of heart failure symptoms and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, improved QoL, decreased hospitalizations and reduction of overall healthcare costs[4,5,21].

It is difficult to predict dose requirements of ESA in individual patients who have high comorbidities, diabetes, other disorders, and inflammation. Hb should be increased slowly between 1.0–2.0 g/dL (10–20 g/L) per month during the initial ESA therapy (correction phase), so as to avoid adverse effects like hypertension, seizures, vascular access thrombosis, and possible cardiovascular events. However, it is recommended that the starting dose of epoetin alpha should be 20–50 IU/kg weight thrice every week with Hb target of 11.0-12.0 g/dL. Dose adjustment should be determined by the patient’s Hb level, the target Hb level, the observed rate of increase in Hb level and clinical circumstances[20,22].

Results from the present study showed that subcutaneously administered Hema-Plus at the doses and frequencies used in this patient population for treatment of anemia in CKD patients with PD significantly increased Hb levels over 12 wk. More than half of the study patients (60%) had Hb levels within (26.67%) or higher (33.33%) than the target range (11-12 g/dL)[1] at week 12 with percentages of change ranging from 8.22% to 134.62%. In addition, there were significant improvements in the QoL scores in all domains between baseline and week 12. The previous studies about QoL in PD patients have also shown that anemia was a significant factor in lowering the patients’ QoL[23-25]. Access to medicines is a significant factor to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being of all people of all ages[26]. The Hema-Plus, which is a locally made recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with lower cost, might help Thai people to gain more accessibility to epoetin alfa in Thailand.

This present study showed that the patients with infection had a significantly lower Hb level when compared to the patients without infection. This result was consistent with several studies that have indicated that markers of inflammation have an association with decreased response to EPO[27]. In this present study, only infection had a certain variation which was adequate to test for statistical significance. There are a lot of factors that influence the response to rHuEPO to keep in mind[27], such as iron deficiency[28-30], oxidative stress[31-33], hyperparathyroidism[34], and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors[35,36].

In terms of safety, epoetin alpha is generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported AEs from studies of epoetin alpha in phase I trials are headache, polycythemia, tiredness, common cold, diarrhea, nausea, stomach pains, chest pressure sensation, back pain, leg pain, and dizziness[37]. In this present study there were 38 AEs experienced by patients exposed to Hema-Plus treatment for 12 wk. The majority of AEs were mild to moderate with 1 AE (volume overload) which was severe in intensity. The highest rate of AE was exit site infection/inflammation, followed by edema, catheter malfunction, pneumonia, hypoglycemia, and hypertensive urgency, respectively. All of the AEs were very unlikely to be related to study drug, except two SAEs (hypertensive urgency) which were deemed to be probably related to Hema-Plus according to investigators assessment. A multicenter study[38] analyzed the effectiveness of administering relatively high doses of rHuEPO subcutaneously in 41 patients CAPD by giving once every week dosing for 8 wk (initial phase) followed by once every 2 wk dosing for 12 wk (maintenance phase). The highest dose of rHuEPO within the initial 8 wk was 12000 IU once per week and within the maintenance phase was 12000 IU twice weekly. The results from this study showed that administration of the relatively high doses of rHuEPO was safe and potentially an effective administration plan for the correction of renal anemia. However, there were 2 patients who developed treatable hypertension with mild headache in the study[38]. Therefore, blood pressure should be closely monitored when patients are receiving high dose high frequency of rHuEPO. In the present study, there was no PRCA, a rare but serious complication related to epoetin[7,8], reported during the 12-wk administration of the study drug.

Limitations

Our study had some limitations that require attention. This study was an open-label single group study which did not directly compare with other epoetin alfa medications. The study design of this study intended to evaluate efficacy and safety during the correction phase of the study drug, and did not include maintenance therapy. The study treatment was 12 wk in which the long-term safety might not be concluded. In addition, a large numbers of subjects were required to study PRCA event because the PRCA incidence rates were very low[39]. The longer period study is suggested to determine whether use of Hema-Plus could maintain the Hb level with acceptable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that Hema-Plus administered for 12 wk was effective in correcting anemia in CKD patients undergoing PD with significantly improved QoL. The safety profile was acceptable and also looked comparable to epoetin alfa.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

The Hema-Plus is a locally made recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) that may help Thai people to gain more accessibility to epoetin alfa in Thailand due to lower costs.

Research motivation

There are no publicly available studies of Hema-Plus in Thai chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). The results from this study may be used as an evidence and information for considering to use Hema-Plus, locally made rHuEPO in these patients.

Research objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hema-Plus for treatment of anemia during correction phase in Thai patients with Stage V CKD on PD.

Research methods

An open-label, multi-center study of Hema-Plus in patients was used to assess the efficacy, i.e., mean change in hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline, safety, and changes in quality of life (QoL) after receiving the study drug for 12 wk.

Research results

Efficacy analysis comprised 30 patients. At the end of 12 wk-treatment, mean Hb was statistically significantly increased from baseline. Two hypertensive urgency events were observed probably related to study medication. QoL scores were significantly increased from baseline.

Research conclusions

Hema-Plus administered for 12 wk for treatment of anemia in CKD patients on PD effectively could increase Hb levels, and QoL with acceptable safety profile.

Research perspectives

This study results could be used as an evidence for efficacy and safety information of the locally made rHuEPO, Hema-Plus for anemia correction phase. Longer study duration is suggested to ensure long-term safety and efficacy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to Mr. Stephen Pinder a medical-English specialist for English proofreading of this manuscript. We are also graceful to Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University for permission to use the validated KDQOL-36 in Thai Kidney Disease Patient Questionnaire in this study.