Literature DB >> 17635745

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness.

David W Johnson1, Carol A Pollock, Iain C Macdougall.   

Abstract

Approximately 5-10% of patients with chronic kidney disease demonstrate hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), defined as a continued need for greater than 300 IU/kg per week erythropoietin or 1.5 mug/kg per week darbepoetin administered by the subcutaneous route. Such hyporesponsiveness contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality and health-care economic burden in chronic kidney disease and represents an important diagnostic and management challenge. The commonest causes of ESA resistance are non-compliance, absolute or functional iron deficiency and inflammation. It is widely accepted that maintaining adequate iron stores, ideally by administering iron parenterally, is the most important strategy for reducing the requirements for, and enhancing the efficacy of ESA. There have been recent epidemiologic studies linking parenteral iron therapy to an increased risk of infection and atherosclerosis, although other investigations have refuted this. Inflammatory ESA hyporesponsiveness has been reported to be improved by a number of interventions, including the use of biocompatible membranes, ultrapure dialysate, transplant nephrectomy, ascorbic acid therapy, vitamin E supplementation, statins and oxpentifylline administration. Other variably well-established causes of ESA hyporesponsiveness include inadequate dialysis, hyperparathyroidism, nutrient deficiencies (vitamin B12, folate, vitamin C, carnitine), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, aluminium overload, antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia, primary bone marrow disorders, myelosuppressive agents, haemoglobinopathies, haemolysis and hypersplenism. This paper reviews the causes of ESA hyporesponsiveness and the clinical evidence for proposed therapeutic interventions. A practical algorithm for approaching the investigation and management of patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness is also provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635745     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00810.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)        ISSN: 1320-5358            Impact factor:   2.506


  48 in total

1.  Relationship between responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and long-term outcomes in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ogawa; Himiko Shimizu; Ai Kyono; Masayo Sato; Tetsuri Yamashita; Kuniaki Otsuka; Kosaku Nitta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Early response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Michio Kuwahara; Youhei Arai; Eriko Takehara; Yasunori Sasaki; Tomoharu Yoshimine; Keita Kusaka; Satomi Shikuma; Wataru Akita; Shinichi Uchida
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.801

3.  Notch Downregulation and Extramedullary Erythrocytosis in Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase 2-Deficient Mice.

Authors:  Mikko N M Myllymäki; Jenni Määttä; Elitsa Y Dimova; Valerio Izzi; Timo Väisänen; Johanna Myllyharju; Peppi Koivunen; Raisa Serpi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Iron Balance and the Role of Hepcidin in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Tomas Ganz; Elizabeta Nemeth
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Evaluation of the impact of a new synthetic vitamin E-bonded membrane on anemia and rHuEPO requirement in ESRD patients with central venous catheters: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Mandolfo; B Corradi; R Bucci; M Farina; F Pilolli; F Galli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Evaluation of the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents in a hospital setting to assess the necessity of a protocol-driven anemia management service.

Authors:  Shivali K Patel; Michael R Griggs; Yehya M Ghoneim; Cindy K Malhotra; Andrew Z Fenves; Susan C Jacob
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 7.  Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Stabilizers: a New Avenue for Reducing BP While Helping Hemoglobin?

Authors:  Farhanah Yousaf; Bruce Spinowitz
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  A patient undergoing chronic dialysis whose renal anemia was successfully corrected by treatment with cinacalcet.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Oshiro; Hisataka Tanaka; Niro Okimoto
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.801

9.  Oncostatin M receptor β and cysteine/histidine-rich 1 are biomarkers of the response to erythropoietin in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jon B Klein; Michael E Brier; Michael L Merchant; Adam E Gaweda; Andrew J Dailey; Daniel W Wilkey; Xiaolan Zhang; Brad H Rovin
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Soluble erythropoietin receptor contributes to erythropoietin resistance in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Eliyahu V Khankin; Walter P Mutter; Hector Tamez; Hai-Tao Yuan; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.