Literature DB >> 34908665

Psychological aspect of common people during lockdown.

Biswajit Chaklader1, Kajal Srivastava1, Hetal Rathod1, Amitav Banerjee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lockdown was implemented to restrict the transmission of COVID-19. This brought upon many unforeseen hurdles, including mental health problems. AIM: The aim of the study is to assess the impact of lockdown on mental health.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using Google Form, which the participants were requested to complete online. The questionnaire included sociodemographic information and general health questionnaire (GHQ)-12, which was used to screen for mental health.
RESULTS: A total of 343 participants took part in the study in which 113 participants (32.9%) were having GHQ score of less than or equal to 12. The study showed that people aged less than 41 years were able to concentrate more during lockdown (75.6%) as compared to people aged more than 41 years (65%). Younger participants who were less than 41 years reported sleep disorders associated with late-night entertainment and TV viewing (24.5%). Many experienced stress during lockdown, but it was more in people over 60 years (63.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: An appreciable proportion of the participants faced stress during lockdown. Elderly people were more affected. Sleeping disorders were associated with late-night entertainment and TV viewing in younger people. Copyright:
© 2021 Industrial Psychiatry Journal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; general health questionnaire; mental health

Year:  2021        PMID: 34908665      PMCID: PMC8611588          DOI: 10.4103/0972-6748.328789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Psychiatry J        ISSN: 0972-6748


The World Health Organization defined mental health “as a state of well-being in which every person realizes his or her potential, can cope with normal day-to-day stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to contribute to his or her community.”[1] Conventionally, clinicians can successfully assess the state of an individual's well-being by gauging substance abuse, anxiety, distress, and depression.[2] Health is not merely an absence of ill health but is also defined as a “…state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being.[3] The general health questionnaire (GHQ)-12 helps screen psychological disorders in primary healthcare and outpatient settings.[456] December 2019 saw a cluster of pneumonia-like disease, first reported in Wuhan, China, which was identified as novel coronavirus and later renamed as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[7] More than a year has gone by and the world has seen around 190 million infections by the virus with 4 million deaths.[8] Lockdown was proposed as an emergency measure to restrict the movement of people to interrupt transmission.[9] It is estimated that one-third of the world's population were under some sort of restriction and lockdown.[10] A recent study on psychological impact of quarantine during the SARS pandemic showed a wide range of mental health impact ranging from stress, insomnia, depression, anxiety, and PTSD.[11] India clamped nationwide lockdown on March 24, 2020. We assessed the impact of lockdown in mental health using GHQ-12 as a screening tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted through Google Form using social media such as WhatsApp groups. Approval of institutional ethical committee was obtained before starting the study. All participants gave written informed consent. The study was conducted over a period of 3 months. A total of 343 participants over 18 years took part in the study.

Tool

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12) is a 12 item scale which is widely used as a screening test for mental health status.[12]

Methodology

In addition to the responses to GHQ-12, sociodemographic information such as gender, age, occupation, and residence was collected. Besides, we included questions about the effects of lockdown on concentration, sleep, self-confidence, and stress during lockdown. A pilot study was done first. Based on the results of pilot study, the calculated sample size was 300. After taking informed consent from participants, all the information was collected on predesigned and pretested questionnaire through Google Forms. Data collection was done for 1-month period. Data from 343 participants were collected.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was carried out using Epi-Info TM 7.2.3.0 statistical software (developed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia). Categorical data were presented as numbers and percentages. Quantitative data were summarized with mean and standard deviation. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to test for significant differences.

RESULTS

Age and gender distribution of the participants

Out of the 343 participants, 149 (43.4%) were males and 194 (56.56%) were females; 207 (60.34%) were between 21 and 40 years and 11 (3.20%) were above 60 years. Most were from big cities such as Pune which had 106 (30.90%) participants and Delhi which had 39 (11.37%) participants. 82 (23.90%) participants were doctors, 125 (36.44%) participants were students, and 25 (7.2%) were in government service. Participants aged between 21 and 40 years and above 60 years were not able to concentrate on task during lockdown as compared to other age groups. The elders also experienced difficulty in falling asleep due to worries related to news of COVID-19 and its consequences. All the participants highlighted that they were capable of making decisions during lockdown, but participants over 60 years were felt less confident. Stress was experienced by all age groups during lockdown more commonly between those 21 and 40 years of age, followed by participants with age less than 21 years and those above 60 years [Table 1].
Table 1

Age distributions of responses

ComponentsMean (SD)Total All age (343)

Age groups (years) (n)

18-20 (53)21-40 (207)41-60 (72)60 plus (11)
You have been able to concentrate on whatever you are doing during lockdown1.16 (0.87)1.53 (0.91)1.25 (0.93)1.61 (0.86)1.16 (0.83)
You are experiencing difficulty in falling asleep due to worries related to news of COVID-19 and its consequences1.16 (0.91)1.66 (0.97)0.75 (0.68)1.63 (0.92)1.05 (0.90)
You feel like you are playing a useful part in things (household work) during the lockdown0.80 (0.61)1.06 (0.79)0.68 (0.60)1.12 (0.78)0.75 (0.64)
You feel that you are capable of making decisions about things during this lockdown1.04 (0.70)1.08 (0.73)1.06 (0.68)0.85 (0.62)0.98 (0.68)
You are experiencing constant strain (mental pressure) during lockdown due to pandemic1.48 (0.91)2.13 (0.83)1.25 (0.77)1.69 (0.88)1.43 (0.91)
You feel like you could not overcome your difficulty during lockdown1.38 (0.85)1.33 (0.81)1.43 (1.03)1.63 (0.85)1.28 (0.83)
You feel like you are enjoying your normal day-to-day activities during lockdown1.49 (0.88)1.80 (1.01)1.43 (0.81)1.60 (0.78)1.32 (0.87)
You have been able to face up your problems during the lockdown1.49 (0.88)1.80 (1.01)1.43 (0.81)1.60 (0.78)1.09 (0.68)
You have been feeling unhappy and depressed during long stay in home1.38 (0.94)1.52 (1.20)1.58 (0.99)1.19 (0.96)1.36 (0.96)
You are feeling less confident in yourself during this phase of lockdown1.14 (0.86)1.08 (0.94)1.12 (0.84)1.08 (0.83)1.14 (0.85)
You think yourself as a worthless person during the period of lockdown0.84 (0.81)0.95 (0.92)0.93 (0.96)1.06 (0.96)0.89 (0.87)
You have been feeling reasonably happy during this phase of lockdown1.28 (0.75)1.34 (0.77)1.41 (0.80)1.27 (0.81)1.29 (0.77)

SD – Standard deviation; COVID 19 – Coronavirus disease 2019

Age distributions of responses SD – Standard deviation; COVID 19 – Coronavirus disease 2019 Majority were able to enjoy their daily activities and could manage problems with ease during lockdown. Few participants felt that they were “feeling less confident” and “feeling worthless” during the lockdown. Female participants were able to focus more on task during lockdown as compare to male counterpart (P = 0.0008). Sleep difficulty was seen more among women (P = 0.0094). Compared to females, more males believed that they were capable of making decisions during lockdown (P = 0.112); however, it was not statistically significant. Both genders equally felt stress due to lockdown (P = 0.84). Female participants felt that they consider themselves worthless during lockdown, whereas fewer males felt so (P = 0.28); however, the difference was not significant [Table 2].
Table 2

Gender distributions of responses

ComponentsGender (n) P

Male (149) Mean (SD)MedianFemale (194) Mean (SD)Median
You have been able to concentrate on whatever you are doing during lockdown0.99 (0.79)11.30 (0.83)10.0008
You are experiencing difficulty in falling asleep due to worries related to news of COVID 19 and its consequences0.91 (0.88)11.16 (0.90)10.0094
You feel like you are playing a useful part in things (household work) during the lockdown0.72 (0.68)10.75 (0.60)10.4408
You feel that you are capable of making decisions about things during this lockdown1.05 (0.72)10.92 (0.64)10.1120
You are experiencing constant strain (mental pressure) during lockdown due to pandemic1.44 (0.87)11.41 (0.93)10.8493
You feel like you could not overcome your difficulty during lockdown1.32 (0.80)11.26 (0.85)10.5372
You feel like you are enjoying your normal day-to-day activities during lockdown1.27 (0.87)11.34 (0.86)10.5014
You have been able to face up your problems during the lockdown1.08 (0.70)11.10 (0.65)10.7487
You have been feeling unhappy and depressed during long1.35 (0.96)11.36 (0.97)10.9986
You are feeling less confident in yourself during this phase of lockdown1.13 (0.85)11.10 (0.85)10.6779
You think yourself as a worthless person during the period of lockdown0.81 (0.76)10.96 (0.94)10.2864
You have been feeling reasonably happy during this phase of lockdown1.26 (0.73)11.31 (0.81)10.5272

The data reject normality and therefore Mann-Whitney test (independent samples) was applied. SD – Standard deviation; COVID 19 – Coronavirus disease 2019

Gender distributions of responses The data reject normality and therefore Mann-Whitney test (independent samples) was applied. SD – Standard deviation; COVID 19 – Coronavirus disease 2019

DISCUSSION

Lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns regarding its impact on mental health. The widespread lockdown is expected to have a psychological impact on individuals, families, and communities.[13] People with age less than 21 years and participants aged between 41 and 60 years felt reduction in concentration during the lockdown period. Overall mean of this component of GHQ-12 was 1.16 which was much lesser than 2.68 which were seen in another study which took place between March and April 2020.[14] Reports about anxiety, fear, frustration, loneliness, anger, depression, and stress were found commonly associated with restrictive measures, such as quarantine and lockdown.[13] Headline Stress Disorder was named for the psychiatric disorder caused by too many news coverage. It is a highly emotional response such as feeling of anxiety and stress, to endless reports from news media.[15] Another review article assessed the psychological impact of quarantine, reported insomnia, exhaustion, anxiety, and irritability as few common symptoms.[16] Sleep changes were observed during the COVID-19 lockdown. People went to bed later during the lockdown compared to prelockdown period. There was a significant increase in the waking hours. Other investigators have also reported insomnia and sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic.[17] Msherghi et al.[18] reported irritability (70.8%), anger (70.1%), and fatigue (61.5%) among people under restrictive measures. These symptoms need to be addressed.[18] Similar to the present study, other studies have reported mental health issues in young adults.[192021] While both genders faced more or less similar levels of stress, it has been reported than men underreport it due to societal expectations to be stronger mentally.[22] Like in our study, 27% of people living in Michigan had suffered from low self-esteem during the pandemic, 22% of females in the above study felt the same, and 42% of people expressed that their self-esteem during pandemic has gone down.[23] The findings of the study are limited to those with access to smartphones and having knowledge of the English language. This could lead to selection bias. In addition, it was an online survey, with inherent limitations. There is a need to find out the effect of repeated lockdowns on mental health by field studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health of both young and old was affected in varying degrees by the lockdown. Some of the issues were stress, not able to overcome difficulties, feeling unhappy and depressed, and lack of confidence. Long periods of lockdown can have adverse effects on mental health.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  12 in total

1.  What is the General Health Questionnaire-12 assessing? Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a large scale German population sample.

Authors:  Matthias Romppel; Elmar Braehler; Marcus Roth; Heide Glaesmer
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.735

2.  Changes in sleep pattern and sleep quality during COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Sandeep Grover; Aniruddha Basu; Vijay Krishnan; Adarsh Tripathi; Alka Subramanyam; Anil Nischal; Arshad Hussain; Aseem Mehra; Atul Ambekar; Gautam Saha; Kshirod Kumar Mishra; Manish Bathla; Mukesh Jagiwala; Narayana Manjunatha; Naresh Nebhinani; Navendu Gaur; Niraj Kumar; Pronob Kumar Dalal; Pankaj Kumar; Purav Kumar Midha; Ritu Daga; Sai Krishna Tikka; Samir Kumar Praharaj; Sandeep Kumar Goyal; Shweta Kanchan; Siddharth Sarkar; Sourav Das; Sujit Sarkhel; Susanta Kumar Padhy; Swapnajeet Sahoo; T S Satyanarayana Rao; Vaibhav Dubey; Vikas Menon; Vishal Chhabra; Vivekanand Lahan; Ajit Avasthi
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Post-COVID syndrome and suicide risk.

Authors:  L Sher
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2021-04-27

4.  Perceptions of work stress causes and effective interventions in employees working in public, private and non-governmental organisations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kamaldeep Bhui; Sokratis Dinos; Magdalena Galant-Miecznikowska; Bertine de Jongh; Stephen Stansfeld
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2016-12

5.  Related Health Factors of Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain.

Authors:  Juan Gómez-Salgado; Montserrat Andrés-Villas; Sara Domínguez-Salas; Diego Díaz-Milanés; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population.

Authors:  Gianluca Serafini; Bianca Parmigiani; Andrea Amerio; Andrea Aguglia; Leo Sher; Mario Amore
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2020-06-22

7.  Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems.

Authors:  Md Zahir Ahmed; Oli Ahmed; Zhou Aibao; Sang Hanbin; Liu Siyu; Akbaruddin Ahmad
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-04-14

8.  Correlates of symptoms of anxiety and depression and mental wellbeing associated with COVID-19: a cross-sectional study of UK-based respondents.

Authors:  Lee Smith; Louis Jacob; Anita Yakkundi; Daragh McDermott; Nicola C Armstrong; Yvonne Barnett; Guillermo F López-Sánchez; Suzanne Martin; Laurie Butler; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Mental Health Consequences of Lockdown During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ahmed Msherghi; Ali Alsuyihili; Ahmed Alsoufi; Aimen Ashini; Zenib Alkshik; Entisar Alshareea; Hanadi Idheiraj; Taha Nagib; Munera Abusriwel; Nada Mustafa; Fatima Mohammed; Ayah Eshbeel; Abobaker Elbarouni; Muhammed Elhadi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-26

10.  Letter to the editor: Headline stress disorder caused by Netnews during the outbreak of COVID-19.

Authors:  Mengyuan Dong; Jin Zheng
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Digital Economy on the Economic Growth and the Development Strategies in the post-COVID-19 Era: Evidence From Countries Along the "Belt and Road".

Authors:  Jinzhu Zhang; Wenqi Zhao; Baodong Cheng; Aixin Li; Yanzhuo Wang; Ning Yang; Yuan Tian
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.