Literature DB >> 23206494

What is the General Health Questionnaire-12 assessing? Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a large scale German population sample.

Matthias Romppel1, Elmar Braehler, Marcus Roth, Heide Glaesmer.   

Abstract

Since the dimensionality and the related psychometric properties of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) are still under debate, the present study compares different factor solutions from the literature to determine which shows the best fit and to investigate reliability and construct validity. The analyses are based on a German population based representative sample (N=2,041), using face-to-face-interviews. The confirmatory factor analysis indicates the best fit to the one-factor model including response bias on the negative worded items according to Hankins. Thus, the importance of methodical aspects for the dimensionality was emphasized. Moreover, the correlations of the different subscales of the two- and three-factor models with several external criteria (BDI, PHQ-2, SF-36, PHQ-Anxiety, SPIN) do not substantially differ. The preferred unidimensional model shows good psychometric properties. According to its associations with the external criteria under study, the GHQ-12 as a unidimensional measure seems to be a useful screening tool for the assessment of mental distress or a minor psychiatric morbidity with a main focus on depressive symptomatology.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206494     DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  34 in total

1.  Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a German and a Colombian population sample.

Authors:  Matthias Romppel; Andreas Hinz; Carolyn Finck; Jeremy Young; Elmar Brähler; Heide Glaesmer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Sleep quality, obstructive sleep apnea, and psychological distress in truck drivers: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ottavia Guglielmi; Nicola Magnavita; Sergio Garbarino
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Stress and Wellbeing of Psychiatry Trainees: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Rhoda Lai; Christos Plakiotis
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Computerized adaptive testing of population psychological distress: simulation-based evaluation of GHQ-30.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Jan R Böhnke; Kate E Pickett; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  What's up doc? A national cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland.

Authors:  Blánaid Hayes; Lucia Prihodova; Gillian Walsh; Frank Doyle; Sally Doherty
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Psychological morbidity, quality of life, and self-rated health in the military personnel.

Authors:  Han-Wei Chou; Wen-Chii Tzeng; Yu-Ching Chou; Hui-Wen Yeh; Hsin-An Chang; Yu-Cheng Kao; Nian-Sheng Tzeng
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing for general psychological distress: combining GHQ-12 and Affectometer-2 in an item bank for public mental health research.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Jan R Böhnke; Kate E Pickett; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  The factor structure of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in young Chinese civil servants.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Lei Wang; Xican Yin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Assessment of depression severity with the PHQ-9 in cancer patients and in the general population.

Authors:  Andreas Hinz; Anja Mehnert; Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent; Elmar Brähler; Thomas Forkmann; Susanne Singer; Thomas Schulte
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Defeat and entrapment: more than meets the eye? Applying network analysis to estimate dimensions of highly correlated constructs.

Authors:  Thomas Forkmann; Tobias Teismann; Jana-Sophie Stenzel; Heide Glaesmer; Derek de Beurs
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.