Literature DB >> 34907756

Acute effect of spinal cord stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with heart failure.

Jan Naar1, Deborah Jaye2, Petr Neuzil1, Petr Doskar1, Filip Malek1, Bengt Linderoth3, Goran Lind3, Marcus Stahlberg3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) acutely improves heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) in patients with heart failure (HF).
METHODS: SCS (15 minutes) was delivered in four different settings: 90% of maximal tolerated stimulation amplitude (MTA) targeting the T1-T4 spinal cord segments (SCS90T1-4), 60% of MTA (SCS60T1-4), 90% of MTA with cranial (SCS90CR) and caudal (SCS90CA) electrode configuration. HRV and BRS were recorded continuously and stimulation was compared to device off.
RESULTS: Fifteen HF patients were included. SCS90T1-4 did not change the standard deviation of intervals between normal beats (SDNN, p = 0.90), BRS (p = 0.55) or other HRV parameters. In patients with baseline SDNN <50 ms, SCS90T1-4 significantly increased SDNN (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute SCS at 60-90% of MTA targeting upper thoracic spinal cord segments does not improve autonomic balance or baroreceptor sensitivity in unselected patients with heart failure but may improve HRV in patients with low SDNN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baroreceptor sensitivity; Heart failure; Heart rate variability; Spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34907756     DOI: 10.32725/jab.2021.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomed        ISSN: 1214-021X            Impact factor:   1.797


  31 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation and 30-minute heart rate variability in refractory angina patients.

Authors:  Matteo Anselmino; Laura Ravera; Anna De Luca; Michele Capriolo; Roberto Bordese; Gian P Trevi; Roberto Grimaldi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Noninvasive cardiac output measurement: A new tool in heart failure.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Gaia Cattadori
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.869

3.  Thoracic spinal cord stimulation reduces the risk of ischemic ventricular arrhythmias in a postinfarction heart failure canine model.

Authors:  Ziad F Issa; Xiaohong Zhou; Michael R Ujhelyi; Josh Rosenberger; Deepak Bhakta; William J Groh; John M Miller; Douglas P Zipes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Spinal cord stimulation protects against atrial fibrillation induced by tachypacing.

Authors:  Scott A Bernstein; Brian Wong; Carolina Vasquez; Stuart P Rosenberg; Ryan Rooke; Laura M Kuznekoff; Joshua M Lader; Vanessa M Mahoney; Tatyana Budylin; Marie Älvstrand; Tammy Rakowski-Anderson; Rupinder Bharmi; Riddhi Shah; Steven Fowler; Douglas Holmes; Taraneh G Farazi; Larry A Chinitz; Gregory E Morley
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Parasympathetic control of cardiac sympathetic activity: normal ventricular function versus congestive heart failure.

Authors:  E R Azevedo; J D Parker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris.

Authors:  R D Foreman; B Linderoth; J L Ardell; K W Barron; M J Chandler; S S Hull; G J TerHorst; M J DeJongste; J A Armour
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 7.  Low-frequency power of heart rate variability is not a measure of cardiac sympathetic tone but may be a measure of modulation of cardiac autonomic outflows by baroreflexes.

Authors:  David S Goldstein; Oladi Bentho; Mee-Yeong Park; Yehonatan Sharabi
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Spinal cord activation differentially modulates ischaemic electrical responses to different stressors in canine ventricles.

Authors:  René Cardinal; Jeffrey L Ardell; Bengt Linderoth; Michel Vermeulen; Robert D Foreman; J Andrew Armour
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 3.145

9.  Very low frequency power of heart rate variability is a powerful predictor of clinical prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Hadase; Akihiro Azuma; Kan Zen; Satoshi Asada; Tatsuya Kawasaki; Tadaaki Kamitani; Shingo Kawasaki; Hiroki Sugihara; Hiroaki Matsubara
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 10.  Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability.

Authors:  Junichiro Hayano; Emi Yuda
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.