BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to modulate atrial electrophysiology and confer protection against ischemia and ventricular arrhythmias in animal models. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SCS reduces the susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF) induced by tachypacing (TP). METHODS: In 21 canines, upper thoracic SCS systems and custom cardiac pacing systems were implanted. Right atrial and left atrial effective refractory periods were measured at baseline and after 15 minutes of SCS. Following recovery in a subset of canines, pacemakers were turned on to induce AF by alternately delivering TP and searching for AF. Canines were randomized to no SCS therapy (CTL) or intermittent SCS therapy on the initiation of TP (EARLY) or after 8 weeks of TP (LATE). AF burden (percent AF relative to total sense time) and AF inducibility (percentage of TP periods resulting in AF) were monitored weekly. After 15 weeks, echocardiography and histology were performed. RESULTS: Effective refractory periods increased by 21 ± 14 ms (P = .001) in the left atrium and 29 ± 12 ms (P = .002) in the right atrium after acute SCS. AF burden was reduced for 11 weeks in EARLY compared with CTL (P <.05) animals. AF inducibility remained lower by week 15 in EARLY compared with CTL animals (32% ± 10% vs 91% ± 6%; P <.05). AF burden and inducibility were not significantly different between LATE and CTL animals. There were no structural differences among any groups. CONCLUSIONS: SCS prolonged atrial effective refractory periods and reduced AF burden and inducibility in a canine AF model induced by TP. These data suggest that SCS may represent a treatment option for AF.
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to modulate atrial electrophysiology and confer protection against ischemia and ventricular arrhythmias in animal models. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SCS reduces the susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF) induced by tachypacing (TP). METHODS: In 21 canines, upper thoracic SCS systems and custom cardiac pacing systems were implanted. Right atrial and left atrial effective refractory periods were measured at baseline and after 15 minutes of SCS. Following recovery in a subset of canines, pacemakers were turned on to induce AF by alternately delivering TP and searching for AF. Canines were randomized to no SCS therapy (CTL) or intermittent SCS therapy on the initiation of TP (EARLY) or after 8 weeks of TP (LATE). AF burden (percent AF relative to total sense time) and AF inducibility (percentage of TP periods resulting in AF) were monitored weekly. After 15 weeks, echocardiography and histology were performed. RESULTS: Effective refractory periods increased by 21 ± 14 ms (P = .001) in the left atrium and 29 ± 12 ms (P = .002) in the right atrium after acute SCS. AF burden was reduced for 11 weeks in EARLY compared with CTL (P <.05) animals. AF inducibility remained lower by week 15 in EARLY compared with CTL animals (32% ± 10% vs 91% ± 6%; P <.05). AF burden and inducibility were not significantly different between LATE and CTL animals. There were no structural differences among any groups. CONCLUSIONS: SCS prolonged atrial effective refractory periods and reduced AF burden and inducibility in a canineAF model induced by TP. These data suggest that SCS may represent a treatment option for AF.
Authors: René Cardinal; Pierre Pagé; Michel Vermeulen; Caroline Bouchard; Jeffrey L Ardell; Robert D Foreman; J Andrew Armour Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Mark J Shen; Tetsuji Shinohara; Hyung-Wook Park; Kyle Frick; Daniel S Ice; Eue-Keun Choi; Seongwook Han; Mitsunori Maruyama; Rahul Sharma; Changyu Shen; Michael C Fishbein; Lan S Chen; John C Lopshire; Douglas P Zipes; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Christoph Scharf; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Srikar Veerareddy; Gerald F Daneshvar; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric P Leip; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joanne M Murabito; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeffrey L Ardell; René Cardinal; Eric Beaumont; Michel Vermeulen; Frank M Smith; J Andrew Armour Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Peter Hanna; Eric Buch; Stavros Stavrakis; Christian Meyer; John D Tompkins; Jeffrey L Ardell; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 10.787