| Literature DB >> 34907277 |
Li Qiao1,2, Mingfu Wang1,2, Zheng Jin1,2, Danbo Mao3.
Abstract
The non-uniformity of image directly affects the application of EMCCD in various disciplines. The proposed method can significantly improve the uniformity of EMCCD output image. The correction algorithm of "reverse split and forward recovery" is determined through analyzing the imaging model of EMCCD, and the comprehensive non-uniformity correction function model is established. The 8-tap EMCCD chip CCD220 of British e2v company is used for experimental verification. The results show that after the comprehensive correction the consistencies of the light response characteristic curve and the multiplication gain curve of each channel in EMCCD are obviously improved, and also the photo response non-uniformity (PRNU) of the output image is substantially reduced from 24.5 to 4.1%, which prove the effectiveness of the proposed method.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34907277 PMCID: PMC8671529 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03478-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Internal working principle of EMCCD.
Figure 2The logic relation of introduced non-uniformity in EMCCD.
Figure 3Photoelectric performance testing system of EMCCD.
Figure 4Calculation flow chart of background signal correction coefficient.
Figure 5Calculation flow chart of comprehensive photoelectric linear conversion coefficient.
Figure 6Calculation flow chart of true multiplication gain when gain voltage is .
Coefficients of fitting functions of each channel in CCD220.
| Coefficients | Channel 1 | Channel 2 | Channel 3 | Channel 4 | Channel 5 | Channel 6 | Channel 7 | Channel 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (e−14) | 8.5009 | 8.5264 | 9.4042 | 8.8456 | 7.8113 | 5.0044 | 7.3359 | 7.9563 |
| b | 8.7199 | 8.7220 | 8.6911 | 8.7060 | 8.7524 | 8.8741 | 8.7621 | 8.7372 |
Figure 7Light response curves of EMCCD before and after comprehensive non-uniformity correction.
Figure 8Comparison of true multiplication gain curves before and after correction.
Figure 9Image comparison before and after correction when the gain voltage is 40.0 V.