Erin Zampaglione1, Matthew Maher1, Emily M Place1, Naomi E Wagner2, Stephanie DiTroia3, Katherine R Chao3, Eleina England3, Broad Cmg3, Andrew Catomeris4, Sherwin Nassiri5, Seraphim Himes6, Joey Pagliarulo7, Charles Ferguson1, Eglé Galdikaité-Braziené1, Brian Cole1, Eric A Pierce1, Kinga M Bujakowska8. 1. Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA. 3. Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA. 4. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. 5. Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL. 6. Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine in California, Vallejo, CA. 7. Department of Genetic Counseling, School of Health and Rehab Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA. 8. Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: kinga_bujakowska@meei.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In Mendelian disease diagnosis, variant analysis is a repetitive, error-prone, and time consuming process. To address this, we have developed the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK), a configurable, automated variant ranking program. METHODS: MATK aggregates variant information from multiple annotation sources and uses expert-designed rules with parameterized weights to produce a ranked list of potentially causal solutions. MATK performance was measured by a comparison between MATK-aided and human-domain expert analyses of 1060 families with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD), analyzed using an IRD-specific gene panel (589 individuals) and exome sequencing (471 families). RESULTS: When comparing MATK-assisted analysis with expert curation in both the IRD-specific gene panel and exome sequencing (1060 subjects), 97.3% of potential solutions found by experts were also identified by the MATK-assisted analysis (541 solutions identified with MATK of 556 solutions found by conventional analysis). Furthermore, MATK-assisted analysis identified 114 additional potential solutions from the 504 cases unsolved by conventional analysis. CONCLUSION: MATK expedites the process of identification of likely solving variants in Mendelian traits, and reduces variability stemming from human error and researcher bias. MATK facilitates data reanalysis to keep up with the constantly improving annotation sources and next-generation sequencing processing pipelines. The software is open source and available at https://gitlab.com/matthew_maher/mendelanalysis.
PURPOSE: In Mendelian disease diagnosis, variant analysis is a repetitive, error-prone, and time consuming process. To address this, we have developed the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK), a configurable, automated variant ranking program. METHODS: MATK aggregates variant information from multiple annotation sources and uses expert-designed rules with parameterized weights to produce a ranked list of potentially causal solutions. MATK performance was measured by a comparison between MATK-aided and human-domain expert analyses of 1060 families with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD), analyzed using an IRD-specific gene panel (589 individuals) and exome sequencing (471 families). RESULTS: When comparing MATK-assisted analysis with expert curation in both the IRD-specific gene panel and exome sequencing (1060 subjects), 97.3% of potential solutions found by experts were also identified by the MATK-assisted analysis (541 solutions identified with MATK of 556 solutions found by conventional analysis). Furthermore, MATK-assisted analysis identified 114 additional potential solutions from the 504 cases unsolved by conventional analysis. CONCLUSION: MATK expedites the process of identification of likely solving variants in Mendelian traits, and reduces variability stemming from human error and researcher bias. MATK facilitates data reanalysis to keep up with the constantly improving annotation sources and next-generation sequencing processing pipelines. The software is open source and available at https://gitlab.com/matthew_maher/mendelanalysis.
Authors: Kishore Jaganathan; Sofia Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou; Jeremy F McRae; Siavash Fazel Darbandi; David Knowles; Yang I Li; Jack A Kosmicki; Juan Arbelaez; Wenwu Cui; Grace B Schwartz; Eric D Chow; Efstathios Kanterakis; Hong Gao; Amirali Kia; Serafim Batzoglou; Stephan J Sanders; Kyle Kai-How Farh Journal: Cell Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Mark B Consugar; Daniel Navarro-Gomez; Emily M Place; Kinga M Bujakowska; Maria E Sousa; Zoë D Fonseca-Kelly; Daniel G Taub; Maria Janessian; Dan Yi Wang; Elizabeth D Au; Katherine B Sims; David A Sweetser; Anne B Fulton; Qin Liu; Janey L Wiggs; Xiaowu Gai; Eric A Pierce Journal: Genet Med Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Nature Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Erin Rooney Riggs; Erica F Andersen; Athena M Cherry; Sibel Kantarci; Hutton Kearney; Ankita Patel; Gordana Raca; Deborah I Ritter; Sarah T South; Erik C Thorland; Daniel Pineda-Alvarez; Swaroop Aradhya; Christa Lese Martin Journal: Genet Med Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Sebastian Köhler; Leigh Carmody; Nicole Vasilevsky; Julius O B Jacobsen; Daniel Danis; Jean-Philippe Gourdine; Michael Gargano; Nomi L Harris; Nicolas Matentzoglu; Julie A McMurry; David Osumi-Sutherland; Valentina Cipriani; James P Balhoff; Tom Conlin; Hannah Blau; Gareth Baynam; Richard Palmer; Dylan Gratian; Hugh Dawkins; Michael Segal; Anna C Jansen; Ahmed Muaz; Willie H Chang; Jenna Bergerson; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Zafer Yüksel; Sergi Beltran; Alexandra F Freeman; Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Daniel Durkin; Andrea L Storm; Marc Hanauer; Michael Brudno; Susan M Bello; Murat Sincan; Kayli Rageth; Matthew T Wheeler; Renske Oegema; Halima Lourghi; Maria G Della Rocca; Rachel Thompson; Francisco Castellanos; James Priest; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Ayushi Hegde; Ruth C Lovering; Catherine Hajek; Annie Olry; Luigi Notarangelo; Morgan Similuk; Xingmin A Zhang; David Gómez-Andrés; Hanns Lochmüller; Hélène Dollfus; Sergio Rosenzweig; Shruti Marwaha; Ana Rath; Kathleen Sullivan; Cynthia Smith; Joshua D Milner; Dorothée Leroux; Cornelius F Boerkoel; Amy Klion; Melody C Carter; Tudor Groza; Damian Smedley; Melissa A Haendel; Chris Mungall; Peter N Robinson Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: William McLaren; Laurent Gil; Sarah E Hunt; Harpreet Singh Riat; Graham R S Ritchie; Anja Thormann; Paul Flicek; Fiona Cunningham Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 13.583