Literature DB >> 34906213

Reproducibility and research integrity: the role of scientists and institutions.

Patrick Diaba-Nuhoho1, Michael Amponsah-Offeh2.   

Abstract

Reproducibility and research integrity are essential tenets of every scientific study and discovery. They serve as proof that an established and documented work can be verified, repeated, and reproduced. New knowledge in the biomedical science is built on the shoulders of established and proven principles. Thus, scientists must be able to trust and build on the knowledge of their colleagues. Scientific innovation and research discoveries especially in the field of medicine has contributed to improving the lives of patients and increasing life expectancies. However, the growing concerns of failure to comply with good scientific principles has resulted in issues with research integrity and reproducibility. Poor reproducibility and integrity, therefore, may lead to ineffective interventions and applications. Here we comment on research reproducibility in basic medical and life sciences with regards to issues arising and outline the role of stakeholders such as research institutions and their employees in addressing this crisis.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual contributions; Reproducibility; Research institutions; Research integrity; Research scientists; Stakeholders

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34906213      PMCID: PMC8672590          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05875-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; John P Sumpter; Anne Fairbrother; Thomas P Augspurger; Timothy J Canfield; William L Goodfellow; Patrick D Guiney; Anne LeHuray; Lorraine Maltby; David B Mayfield; Michael J McLaughlin; Lisa S Ortego; Tamar Schlekat; Richard P Scroggins; Tim A Verslycke
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A manifesto for reproducible science.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Brian A Nosek; Dorothy V M Bishop; Katherine S Button; Christopher D Chambers; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Uri Simonsohn; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jennifer J Ware; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative.

Authors:  Daniel Strech; Tracey Weissgerber; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Need for Implementation Research for Community-based Interventions: Scientific Evidence Is Needed.

Authors:  Kathya Cordova-Pozo
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2022-07

Review 2.  A Brief Guide to Statistical Analysis and Presentation for the Plant Pathology Journal.

Authors:  Junhyun Jeon
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.